Manage a web 2.0 blog network - How do you do?

SimonRohde

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2013
Messages
208
Reaction score
31
Hello,

I'm about to create a nice, and big web 2.0 blog network, witch i'll use for linkbuilding. But one of the thinks i've been thinking about lately, is how do you manage all the emails, passwords, and witch niche the sites is?

Will it be to risky, to use a tool where i can add all the sites, and manage them from there? Such as manage wp?
 
Be nice to witches.

44500076.jpg


On a serious note, just create a spreadsheet in excel. One tab has emails, second one has passwords (or use an universal one), third tab has url and voila.

It's not that complicated.
 
Yeah I want an app that does it for me :)
Add an account, add a proxy - boom. Have them all open at once without worrying.
 
Better start programming then, although I assume it'd be a lot easier to paste in 5 slots into excel per web 2.0 and sacrifice those 30 seconds.
 
If you know little bit programming then you can develop your own app according to your own need. Otherwise you can manage all the data in excel.
 
Check out RankWyz.

Great for web2.0 network or private network.
 
Check rankwyz and fcs networker. Both are great for managing web 2.0s.
 
I think managing accounts is not the most important part of all this. Leaving no fingerprint is.
Do you already have a complete plan how to cover your tracks? I mean, how are you going to set up your sites (using proxies,different CMS etc..)?
 
I think managing accounts is not the most important part of all this. Leaving no fingerprint is.
Do you already have a complete plan how to cover your tracks? I mean, how are you going to set up your sites (using proxies,different CMS etc..)?

Essentially, all OP would need to use is 1 IP per web2.0 account creator such as RankWyz or AutoFill Magic right?
 
I'm considering setting up several virtual machines with assorted operating systems and dedicating each OS to a proxy and creating a fake persona for it. Maybe 3-4 sites per online persona. Can anyone point out flaws in that?

I got the idea from somewhere on BHW but I can't recall who to give credit too.
 
I'm considering setting up several virtual machines with assorted operating systems and dedicating each OS to a proxy and creating a fake persona for it. Maybe 3-4 sites per online persona. Can anyone point out flaws in that?

I got the idea from somewhere on BHW but I can't recall who to give credit too.

Guys,don't go over the board.Google can read ONLY the source code.The IP and other personal informations are NOT displayed when you publish an article or submit a comment.Proxies helps for scraping and managing multiple accounts on the same sites,while staying under the radar (to avoid getting your content/accounts deleted)

Beside that,you can always clear your cookies and that will be enough instead of using virtual machines and such.
 
We are talking about proxies, not for googles sake, but to avoid having multiple accounts in the same web 2.0 platform deleted.
 
As at least one other has said - checkout RankWyz. I didn't buy it, but considered it solely for the purpose of managing my blog sites - not for spamming or any of the other stuff it might do. It looked pretty good!
 
Get a tattoo for each new emails and url and password all over your body ! Undress yourself and look at yourself in the mirror ! No one will ever steal what you have !

Just god damn use the google drive to store all your details !!! Its easy as shit !
 
Or Get a laptop with a simplepass fingerprint scanner and set it to save all your passwords automatically. Then all you have to do is select the account you want from a dropdown menu and swipe your finger, and viola. Fingerprint scanner = My fav seo tool.
 
I just simply use MS Word and copy/past all of the information then store it on a cloud server or something.

-RK
 
I'm considering setting up several virtual machines with assorted operating systems and dedicating each OS to a proxy and creating a fake persona for it. Maybe 3-4 sites per online persona. Can anyone point out flaws in that?

I got the idea from somewhere on BHW but I can't recall who to give credit too.

It might have been me who shared this before, because I think it's a pretty safe way. On the other hand, sometimes, this level of security is not required. It depends on your requirements.
For example, If you only need a few web 2.0s, you can even use your IP (or just a proxy on your main computer) assuming you don't:
- use Chrome
- use Gmail
- use webmaster tools, analytics
- want to blog on G's blog platform
- use any G's stuff whatsoever
Just think it over. If you don't use any of G's stuff, they just can't get to know about every website you visit (or register/post). Simple is that. If you want to use their stuff like webmaster tools or you want to develop an identity (having authorship, socials etc..) than you need to add that extra level of security as you described IMHO. I would mix my sites in a way, some would have G's stuff, some wouldn't. Similarly to how you should mix your blog engines. It just makes it more realistic. I don't know numbers by heart, but assuming half/third of the websites on the internet has some G's tools set up (like analytics, webmaster tools) and you only have links from ones has nothing, would seem unrealistic in my opinion.
 
Be sure to check out RankWyz. If you create all your web2.0 properties, you can just add them to your account and pay $7/mo to manage them - and you can add unlimited web20 site and it has tons of cool features like scraping and post scheduling.
 
Back
Top