Muhatrima
Power Member
- Dec 20, 2020
- 778
- 491
I wonder why this is the case, but it's a tried and tested trick.
If you're watching methods in make money niches or IM, SEO, etc that aren't typically shared for free, never go with the sharks. The sharks are those prominent channels and gurus who primarily sell you dreams while your time translates into money for them, Last thing they want is you figuring it out, and what makes them happy/relevant is to see you being misled. Sort of like (Gatekeepers).
I've often wondered why they do this, but it seems like they view their subscribers as nothing more than dollar signs, shamelessly masking low-quality content with attractive packaging.
Here's the trick:
If a channel has between 20,000 - 50,000 subs, which is neither too low nor too high, this is the sweet spot. These channels usually provide value in exchange for the growth of their channels. (GOLDMINE)
Has anyone else noticed this phenomenon? And why is it that big channels or gurus often seem unconcerned about their channel gradually losing its quality or whether what they're sharing is worthwhile?
This trend is more noticeable in the make money or IM niches, but you can still see it in other niches as well. Once a channel surpasses let's just say 100,000 subs, I typically get off that bus, because it is as if this is human nature and that we can't handle the growth or something!. The moment they are starting to become a well-known face is the moment they start plastering promotional rubbish and nothing of value.
If you're watching methods in make money niches or IM, SEO, etc that aren't typically shared for free, never go with the sharks. The sharks are those prominent channels and gurus who primarily sell you dreams while your time translates into money for them, Last thing they want is you figuring it out, and what makes them happy/relevant is to see you being misled. Sort of like (Gatekeepers).
I've often wondered why they do this, but it seems like they view their subscribers as nothing more than dollar signs, shamelessly masking low-quality content with attractive packaging.
Here's the trick:
If a channel has between 20,000 - 50,000 subs, which is neither too low nor too high, this is the sweet spot. These channels usually provide value in exchange for the growth of their channels. (GOLDMINE)
Has anyone else noticed this phenomenon? And why is it that big channels or gurus often seem unconcerned about their channel gradually losing its quality or whether what they're sharing is worthwhile?
This trend is more noticeable in the make money or IM niches, but you can still see it in other niches as well. Once a channel surpasses let's just say 100,000 subs, I typically get off that bus, because it is as if this is human nature and that we can't handle the growth or something!. The moment they are starting to become a well-known face is the moment they start plastering promotional rubbish and nothing of value.
Last edited:
