Magic Submitter vs. Sick Submitter

I have both, so which one is your favorite?

Chad

Magic is good, & can program your own sites. sick is excellent but needs programming knowledge to code your sites.
sick has far more users than magic submitter. also sick has many packet providers.
so simply sick is the best

Sick Submitter is better than Magic submitter...

Magic Submitter is Very slow As Compare to sick submitter or any Other Tool.

so Sick submitter is Far Better.

Thanks.

For me, Magic Submitter has more intuitive interface. As for speed, I didn't find SS fast but I used it a while ago so maybe that has changed.

as i can see, if you not making oyur own file to SS , the success rate, with the default packets is extremly low. there for, i prefer MGS , simple to use, done the work. exactly what i need now.

also, very important thing, currently, MGS is supporting 50 or so, web 2.0 blogs. while in version 3.x SS isnt supporting none. in version 4 that need to come SS will support but im sure it will be only a few sites, and you will need to code yourself more sites..
so i choose MGS

sick rules

Correct me if I am wrong here.

But I don't really see how Sick Submitter is better than MS.

If people are basing their decisions on price then I see it. But Lower price doesn't = Better tool. Of course sick is going to Have more members its $20 (to Some as low as $12) a month.


1.) Magic Submitter has a easier to use Interface IMO
2.) Magic Submitter is faster. Sick Submitter still uses the browser for submitting Magic Submitter uses sockets, which is actually safer than a browser based submitter.
3.) Magic Submitter comes with more sites and the sites are updated by the owner often. You don't have to pay extra for "Packets". And you can still add ANY site you want to MS.
4.) The designer in MS is easier for adding your own sites than Sick Submitter coding.
5.) MS has a graphical Link wheel Designer and scheduler that makes creating link wheels simple.

I could list Many more but im going to stop there. Sick Submitter is a great tool for the price, But lets be honest here, what features does Sick Submitter really have over Magic Submitter, except price. To some it really is a price issue, and there is nothing wrong with that, but say that instead of just saying "Sick Submitter is better".

People looking for information on the products want to see why one is better than the other with accurate information.

I have listed what MS does better than Sick, can anyone list what sick does better than MS. I honestly would like to know (Not Being Sarcastic) as I may have missed something. All I can see right now is price from my end and I have used both.

Of course Magic Submitter, it uses sockets to run which makes it blazing quick and adding custom sites is easy like peanuts !

The opinions on this topic are way off and inaccurate. Magic Submitter is a far better tool and is extremely fast with its socket mode...too fast as many sites now have robot detection to where I want to ask Alex to put in some human simulation to slow it down.

If you are just getting started though Sick Submitter will do the trick for a cheaper price. You'll have to do your Web 2's by hand though then promote them with Sick. You're going to need to buy some packets to get going and I recommend the SEO 3 pack for $60, its all you need and Scrapebox to supply the rest.

MS doesn't have web directories but I'm not so sure how effective those are anymore. Coding sites in MS is way easier than Sick.

What do you guys mean by "coding sites"?