Magic Submitter Users in here please
- Thread starter RobDB5950
- Start date
Here's the only problem I have with MS (well and XGEN and SEO LINK ROBOT) They aren't multithreaded!
That's the one huge thing SENUKE has on them, I don't use any of them anymore, but I will say, that's why i'd use senuke over them, just because it's multithreaded, takes forever to get something done on MS.
That's the one huge thing SENUKE has on them, I don't use any of them anymore, but I will say, that's why i'd use senuke over them, just because it's multithreaded, takes forever to get something done on MS.
crazycallis
Newbie
- Apr 24, 2009
- 41
- 3
its a cool software but the montly subscription is a drawback
striding cloud
Junior Member
- Jul 14, 2009
- 165
- 961
MS is multithreaded ( up to 8)! been using it for 4 months now and really like it. also it has scheduler ....and regularly being updated. I would say MS is probably the best link building tool as of now ...
Last edited:
RedWolf
BANNED
- Jul 26, 2010
- 1,193
- 838
they have some limit daily
that is always showing me today free captcha limit is over after 10 to 12 hour running
Posted via Mobile Device
Bryan
Power Member
- Aug 25, 2009
- 565
- 295
agreed
crazycallis
Newbie
- Apr 24, 2009
- 41
- 3
does magic submitter have a affiliate program?
black jack
Registered Member
- Oct 8, 2008
- 83
- 4
does it have linkwheel stuff ?
striding cloud
Junior Member
- Jul 14, 2009
- 165
- 961
yes they do ....
you can do that with MS (similar to senuke) they added link wheel creating options on blog post (version 1.21) something like <a href="[prevlink]">anchor text</a>
johnbly341
Junior Member
- Jan 16, 2010
- 108
- 42
Two quick questions for Magic Submitter users:
1. How many computers can you use it on? I know SENuke lets you use it on 2 computers, just not at the same time.
2. Is 1 gig of RAM enough?
1. How many computers can you use it on? I know SENuke lets you use it on 2 computers, just not at the same time.
2. Is 1 gig of RAM enough?
striding cloud
Junior Member
- Jul 14, 2009
- 165
- 961
Two quick questions for Magic Submitter users:
1. How many computers can you use it on? I know SENuke lets you use it on 2 computers, just not at the same time.
sama as senuke ....
2. Is 1 gig of RAM enough?
1 gig + window xp shouldn't be a problem..
1gig + window vista - probably too slow or tendency to hang...
1. How many computers can you use it on? I know SENuke lets you use it on 2 computers, just not at the same time.
sama as senuke ....
2. Is 1 gig of RAM enough?
1 gig + window xp shouldn't be a problem..
1gig + window vista - probably too slow or tendency to hang...
Scritty
Elite Member
- May 1, 2010
- 3,019
- 4,707
Check targethut and you'll find only about a dozen decent web2 sites that allow follow links are left - and they are UBER strict and delete single post "sites" or "pages" very regularly.
SEnuke's keyword tool is a joke, the RSS is on a par with a $5 available from this forum and the bookmarking is very underpowered (certainly no where near as good as Wiz or Demon) The spinner - well it's a bog standard one - not very good.
It's great to watch sites thrown up - makes you feel powerful. Press a button and "whooppee" a new squid lens or blogger site WOW!
Then squid does not give you follow links and 2 days later Blogger tells you you're site is spam and they do not like sites that are not regularly updated.
Sure some stick but then the next day half the sites fail to be built as they have changed their sign up procedure (Wordpress have now changed their sign up "ever so slightly" 12 times in December 2010 alone) and this causes the program to fail.
Magic Submitter allows you to program your own sites - and to fix the "standard" sites that come with the package - you'll spend a lot of time doing this.
At some point you might come to realize that a programmable keyboard and a macro builder for filling in forms (and trhere are plenty of those) does the job just as quickly - and is completely free.
Doesn't have the "wow" factor of "press a button - watch a site being built"
But then more often than not it's "press a button - watch an error message "User name field not found" or "Unable to find URL" or "Captcha failed" or bloody hundreds of others.
Nuke would be good if it was $67 a month Areeb is a very talented programmer - Alex in submitter is too busy adding new features rather than making sure the core ones work properly.
End of the day - you can put up a web2 structure in 45 minutes WITHOUT these tools.
How many web2 structures do you make a month? - cause if it's less than 10 you might want to factor in how much your time is worth. Remember you have to write/buy/nick the content whether you use a tool or not.
The hard work in SEO is mass linking and indexing NOT making fancy web2 sites.
It's the graft that pays - not the glamour.
I know many have done well with Nuke (i was a subscriber for 18 months - and it made me money_ but as more and more sites go n o f o l l o w or just delete single or double post entries - then this becomes less and less of an option.)
It also fails a lot more now than it did in 2009.
So yes - you can make sites and yes they will probably make money. But there aree faster/cheaper more effective ways of doing this..many of them.
Scritty
SEnuke's keyword tool is a joke, the RSS is on a par with a $5 available from this forum and the bookmarking is very underpowered (certainly no where near as good as Wiz or Demon) The spinner - well it's a bog standard one - not very good.
It's great to watch sites thrown up - makes you feel powerful. Press a button and "whooppee" a new squid lens or blogger site WOW!
Then squid does not give you follow links and 2 days later Blogger tells you you're site is spam and they do not like sites that are not regularly updated.
Sure some stick but then the next day half the sites fail to be built as they have changed their sign up procedure (Wordpress have now changed their sign up "ever so slightly" 12 times in December 2010 alone) and this causes the program to fail.
Magic Submitter allows you to program your own sites - and to fix the "standard" sites that come with the package - you'll spend a lot of time doing this.
At some point you might come to realize that a programmable keyboard and a macro builder for filling in forms (and trhere are plenty of those) does the job just as quickly - and is completely free.
Doesn't have the "wow" factor of "press a button - watch a site being built"
But then more often than not it's "press a button - watch an error message "User name field not found" or "Unable to find URL" or "Captcha failed" or bloody hundreds of others.
Nuke would be good if it was $67 a month Areeb is a very talented programmer - Alex in submitter is too busy adding new features rather than making sure the core ones work properly.
End of the day - you can put up a web2 structure in 45 minutes WITHOUT these tools.
How many web2 structures do you make a month? - cause if it's less than 10 you might want to factor in how much your time is worth. Remember you have to write/buy/nick the content whether you use a tool or not.
The hard work in SEO is mass linking and indexing NOT making fancy web2 sites.
It's the graft that pays - not the glamour.
I know many have done well with Nuke (i was a subscriber for 18 months - and it made me money_ but as more and more sites go n o f o l l o w or just delete single or double post entries - then this becomes less and less of an option.)
It also fails a lot more now than it did in 2009.
So yes - you can make sites and yes they will probably make money. But there aree faster/cheaper more effective ways of doing this..many of them.
Scritty
I've been using it for the past 10 days or so... so far I like it. Still working my way through some of the options. The designer is very nice, adding my own sites easily is a big plus for me.
I'd be interested in how other people are using this most effectively...
I'd be interested in how other people are using this most effectively...
I agree with Scritty.
Web 2.0 features are generally wortless so many big sites changing their sign up and program macros generally gives you errors. And I started to think "hey man you are giving money to this program" what if you can do it my hand ?
Magic and xgen is too slow programs... Maybe by hand you can build web 2.0 faster.
Vice versa for me xgen got more points , magic is cheaper than it but i dunno it looks cheap ok program not bad but its ok
Web 2.0 features are generally wortless so many big sites changing their sign up and program macros generally gives you errors. And I started to think "hey man you are giving money to this program" what if you can do it my hand ?
Magic and xgen is too slow programs... Maybe by hand you can build web 2.0 faster.
Vice versa for me xgen got more points , magic is cheaper than it but i dunno it looks cheap ok program not bad but its ok
I tried the Magic Submitter trial for a couple of weeks and canceled it before I was charged $67. It has a lot of potential, and it is frequently updated, sometimes 2-3 times a day. But it still gets really low success numbers for both account creation and submission.
On a good run, I would average about 25% success in creating accounts, and 15%-25% success in submitting items. About a 5% success rate with video sites (yes, I limited it to one browser).
If you have a list of sites and the time, you can add your own sites, but you'll still have to constantly edit them as they change their sign-up pages.
I'm holding out for SeNukeX, I've had good luck with SeNuke in the past, and X looks real promising.
On a good run, I would average about 25% success in creating accounts, and 15%-25% success in submitting items. About a 5% success rate with video sites (yes, I limited it to one browser).
If you have a list of sites and the time, you can add your own sites, but you'll still have to constantly edit them as they change their sign-up pages.
I'm holding out for SeNukeX, I've had good luck with SeNuke in the past, and X looks real promising.
I have Magic Submitter and use it daily. I add my own things to it though. Not interested in senukex at all. I have been spammed to death by them this past week, and by jon ledger too, and a couple of others. That red flags in my brain that they are desperate. Just saying, it seems fishy!