Low quality guest post

new2world

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 16, 2013
Messages
221
Reaction score
62
Hi,

I would like to know if it's fine to have 50-100 guest posts with generic or naked url of the home page. Will it be good or will get any penalty. I cant buy high quality guest post due to high price.

So instead pbn i am aiming 50-guest post even if it's low quality but with brand, generic or naked url. Has anyone tried it?
 
If the low quality sites are spammed to death it will affect your website for sure and it's not recommended.

Instead, you can focus on low metric guest posts which means the sites with clean link profiles, no spammy anchors, and I don't think they are too expensive. But it still provides some value and is good for diversifying your anchor profile.
 
Hi,

I would like to know if it's fine to have 50-100 guest posts with generic or naked url of the home page. Will it be good or will get any penalty. I cant buy high quality guest post due to high price.

So instead pbn i am aiming 50-guest post even if it's low quality but with brand, generic or naked url. Has anyone tried it?

Option 1: Instead of purchasing low-quality guest posts, consider investing in niche-relevant PBN links.

Option 2: Many guest post sellers share site lists before publishing. Since you're looking to build 50-100 links, you can request a list of sites and select quality options at an affordable price.

For anchor text, maintain diversity by using a mix of branded, naked, long-tail, and generic anchors. Additionally, include links pointing to relevant inner pages to avoid anchor text over-optimization and ensure a natural link profile.
 
Hi,

I would like to know if it's fine to have 50-100 guest posts with generic or naked url of the home page. Will it be good or will get any penalty. I cant buy high quality guest post due to high price.

So instead pbn i am aiming 50-guest post even if it's low quality but with brand, generic or naked url. Has anyone tried it?
This can risk penalties if deducted as Google prioritize quality and relevance over quantity
 
A few decent links will get you better, longer-lasting & more guaranteed results,
Especially when it comes to low quality & spammy links, they're more useless than ever,
Don't fall for the numbers including the number of links & other types of metrics, that's not how SEO works,

Ideally, you don't want to buy the most expensive either, they're not as good when it comes to ROI,
There's a sweet spot when it comes to any type of links, where you can get a decent quality with a relatively good price,

Basically, you want to get the most of the link juice for the overall investment for the link profile,
Outreach to less-known niche relevant websites that have a good link profile, clean, genuine with low OBLs,
Well-built micro-niche websites are a good example, they won't have the popularity & demand for a lot of links, so you can negotiate for a lower price
 
Hi,

I would like to know if it's fine to have 50-100 guest posts with generic or naked url of the home page. Will it be good or will get any penalty. I cant buy high quality guest post due to high price.

So instead pbn i am aiming 50-guest post even if it's low quality but with brand, generic or naked url. Has anyone tried it?
Mmm.. i wouldn't appreciate this idea, as per my knowledge it will definitely effect your site negatively.

Instead get few but quality guest posts
 
Hi,

I would like to know if it's fine to have 50-100 guest posts with generic or naked url of the home page. Will it be good or will get any penalty. I cant buy high quality guest post due to high price.

So instead pbn i am aiming 50-guest post even if it's low quality but with brand, generic or naked url. Has anyone tried it?
You should try to get high quality guest post as your website will be penalised using this method.
 
Low-quality guest posts add little value, pass weak authority, and can hurt your site’s trust signals.
 
Low-quality guest posts in bulk won’t give you much ranking power, and if they’re spammy or obviously manipulated, they can do more harm than good. A smaller number of cleaner, relevant links will usually outperform 50–100 cheap ones.
 
Hi,

I would like to know if it's fine to have 50-100 guest posts with generic or naked url of the home page. Will it be good or will get any penalty. I cant buy high quality guest post due to high price.

So instead pbn i am aiming 50-guest post even if it's low quality but with brand, generic or naked url. Has anyone tried it?
Yes, using 50–100 low-quality guest posts with generic or naked URLs is usually safe, but they won’t give much SEO value; focus on quality and diversity instead of volume to avoid risk.
 
No, this is a bad idea. Doing many low quality guest posts, even with brand or naked urls, will likely harm your site's standing rather than help it. It's much better to save up and get fewer, higher quality placements. Quality always beats quantity for these types of efforts.
 
Adding 50–100 guest posts with brand or naked URLs is usually safe. Just avoid spam sites, build slowly, and keep everything looking natural for Google.
 
50 - 100 low quality guest posts with branded or naked URLs is usually safe but mostly gets ignored by Google no big boost, no penalty unless you mix in spammy tactics.
 
You can do it, and branded/generic/naked URLs are much safer, but 50–100 low-quality guest posts won’t give strong long-term results. Most of the time Google just ignores weak links; penalty risk is low unless the sites are spammy or clearly networked. Quality, relevance, and diversity still matter more than volume.
 
FYI @new2world

Stacking 50–100 low-quality guest posts with naked or generic anchors won’t trigger an instant penalty, but it also won’t build any real authority. Google’s 2025 link filters ignore most weak placements, so you end up with noise rather than lift. A small number of solid, relevant links will outwork a big pile of cheap ones every time. If budget is tight, focus on improving your site’s topical depth and mix in a few genuine mentions instead of chasing volume.
 
Back
Top