B. Friendly
BANNED
- Jun 10, 2012
- 386
- 482
During the last week I had occasion to read about a situation with a Boat Rental company in the Florida Keys. They had a problem with their G+ Listing due to physically moving their business a very short distance (50 yards) which had HUGE impact on their G+ listing due to the address being changed.
While looking into the matter, I noticed that they had a backlink in the footer of every single one of their websites' pages, linking to their G+ listing. At first, my thought was that their SEO guy had done this to try to forward some of their money site's "juice" to their G+ listing (yes, and I thought that was a tremendously stupid idea at that time also), but then it occurred to me that it might be considered "reciprocal backlinking" and not only zero-out the value of the juice going to the G+ listing, but it would also zero-out the juice going to the website also.
Worst case scenario, given that every single one of their websites pages were backlinked like this, I thought maybe G might see this as an "unnatural profile". The site already had serious issues with spam backlinks and a complete absence of any consistent NAP for the business, and would this be the "final straw" for Google.
So, I sent an email asking about this possibility to Local SEO guru Andrew Shotland
and surprisingly, I got a personal response within an hour or so.
He says "it's fine" and truthfully there's a part of me that doesn't believe him. We HAVE to believe the guru, right, but we don't have to like it? It seems highly counter-intuitive to me.
So, moving past this point, I looked into the idea of backlinking to your G+ listing from other places, Web 2.0's, Squidoo's, etc..., and the consensus seems to be that Google has somehow "armored" their G+ listing so that it does not receive any benefit from being backlinked. I guess this makes some sense, when you consider that the standards Google uses to determine rankings in the Google Local listings are different than organic listings.
So then this brings me to my latest point, and the point of this thread, which is to consider the value/benefit of backlinking other Social Citations besides the G+ listing. What about Yelp? If you backlink Yelp, do you get any benefit from Google? Can you build a link pyramid to your Yelp listing(s) and from there forward juice to your money site? Or does the juice stay "stuck" at the Yelp listing, and the net result of backlinking to it is that it either pushes your money site lower in the rankings or it pushes competitors off the 1st page.
WOOT!
Interested in finding out what other people know, and other people think.
B. Friendly
While looking into the matter, I noticed that they had a backlink in the footer of every single one of their websites' pages, linking to their G+ listing. At first, my thought was that their SEO guy had done this to try to forward some of their money site's "juice" to their G+ listing (yes, and I thought that was a tremendously stupid idea at that time also), but then it occurred to me that it might be considered "reciprocal backlinking" and not only zero-out the value of the juice going to the G+ listing, but it would also zero-out the juice going to the website also.
Worst case scenario, given that every single one of their websites pages were backlinked like this, I thought maybe G might see this as an "unnatural profile". The site already had serious issues with spam backlinks and a complete absence of any consistent NAP for the business, and would this be the "final straw" for Google.
So, I sent an email asking about this possibility to Local SEO guru Andrew Shotland
Code:
http://www.localseoguide.com/about-me/
It's fine. G doesn't care if you link to your G+ listing or not. It's only zero'd out in the sense that linking to your G+ listing won't improve its rankings.
Andrew Shotland
SEO, Local Search & Web Strategy Consulting
Readfor local search optimization tips & trendsCode:www.localseoguide.com
From:
To:
Sent: Monday, November 5, 2012 5:42 PM
Subject: Question & Possibly a Blog Article Topic
From:
Subject: Question & Possibly a Blog Article Topic
Message Body:
Looking at a business's website, they have a backlink at the footer of every page to their G+ listing, and of course their G+ listing has a link to their Home Page.
I would think this is reciprocal linking and therefore "zeroed out", but someone on BHW claims this is "standard operating procedure" and is somehow good. The only way it can be good is if Google makes an exception for itself on the issue of reciprocal backlinks.
And I've never heard of such a thing. Have you?
He says "it's fine" and truthfully there's a part of me that doesn't believe him. We HAVE to believe the guru, right, but we don't have to like it? It seems highly counter-intuitive to me.
So, moving past this point, I looked into the idea of backlinking to your G+ listing from other places, Web 2.0's, Squidoo's, etc..., and the consensus seems to be that Google has somehow "armored" their G+ listing so that it does not receive any benefit from being backlinked. I guess this makes some sense, when you consider that the standards Google uses to determine rankings in the Google Local listings are different than organic listings.
So then this brings me to my latest point, and the point of this thread, which is to consider the value/benefit of backlinking other Social Citations besides the G+ listing. What about Yelp? If you backlink Yelp, do you get any benefit from Google? Can you build a link pyramid to your Yelp listing(s) and from there forward juice to your money site? Or does the juice stay "stuck" at the Yelp listing, and the net result of backlinking to it is that it either pushes your money site lower in the rankings or it pushes competitors off the 1st page.
WOOT!
Interested in finding out what other people know, and other people think.
B. Friendly
Last edited: