salamalatala
Regular Member
- Dec 29, 2021
- 207
- 171
Every method works, just adapt to the updates of the world 
[List of Methods that do not work]
- Feb 25, 2018
- 2,085
- 1,608
You can add "10 accounts on 1 proxy" however that's not really very smart from the beginning right? Have you ever tried any other method that looks smarter than 10 insta on 1 proxy? You can share that too.
I guess many people just don't really take action and don't know by themselves that it might take 10 lifes to find all the answers by testing everything yourself.
Sharing experiences is not spoonfeeding.
Recently I am surprised by the overall negative thinking I see around here.
If you guys are so pessimistic about this thread why do you keep spamming here?
I don't want the bhw to be only full of fake methods written by the "today I became a millionaire" guys and other ones looking to sell you their bst.
For those who are saying the the golden nugget will not ever be shared. Exactly! That's why this is a thread of methods that didn't work!!! Understand? You don't need to share your very secrets here.
Do you know the answer?
Most of the people who reply and post did not only take their time to read the thread they didn't even read the first post patiently to understand the idea. However, still here to criticise and talk about spoonfeeding.
LegendAndroidX
Power Member
- Nov 1, 2017
- 699
- 612
Method: Trying to make money with bomb crypto ( play to earn crypto game )
Experience: i bought when the game token was at 7$ , didn't get my invested money back ROI : 0%
WHY: game token is dead now it cost 0.5$ for 1 BCOIN lol
Experience: i bought when the game token was at 7$ , didn't get my invested money back ROI : 0%
WHY: game token is dead now it cost 0.5$ for 1 BCOIN lol
nabilox
Registered Member
- Jan 12, 2018
- 86
- 21
Not Spending even on legal things these daysThis is actually good post
Method : Google Ads spamming is hard not spending the budget
Solution: IDK
randomstrings
Supreme Member
- Feb 3, 2021
- 1,325
- 854
Selling peanuts in park always works.
LegendAndroidX
Power Member
- Nov 1, 2017
- 699
- 612
people on this forum are here only to troll and make fun of others , i miss old days of this forum. so sad !
soa0611
Elite Member
- Apr 20, 2015
- 2,790
- 2,542
u mean threshold?
NataGleicy
Newbie
- Feb 1, 2022
- 11
- 1
Good idea, my friend. We can improve if we write down why we failed.
userandom
Newbie
- Mar 13, 2018
- 41
- 13
clone and spin, really good spin works
- Nov 11, 2018
- 12,068
- 10,839
Shadowban is a ban, I consider is worst than ban to be honest with you.
It a way of cheating with app/website users and getting free content, engagement from them.
If someone is not tech savvy he/she will be creating free content for months even years for Google, twitter and Facebook without even knowing.
MgicalaEarner
Elite Member
- Jul 8, 2017
- 3,749
- 4,871
Because of thresholds spammer
DrArchive
Registered Member
- Jan 24, 2022
- 54
- 40
50/50 as well as many trolling, many also contribute.
I guess part of that is that it's in the Lounge thread.
Ndiqi
BANNED
- Apr 12, 2009
- 985
- 442
I have seen some people sharing some methods I know personally works and they list them as not working… I think at some point you just give up and also most probably you’re working from an outdated strategy and unable to creatively adapt with the recent developments…
So, it’s a bit hard to take which is really a method that don’t work
So, it’s a bit hard to take which is really a method that don’t work
I could literally spend my entire day formatting a post for this thread. (LoL)
I am not going do that. (hah)
Based on some of the contention, though, I will say that methods are not as subjective as a lot of folks seem to be suggesting.
Yeah, it's captain obvious that you can't just make a blanket statement, like: "SEO doesn't work". (pft)
You also can't argue that it's value enough to say these are all the personal experiences of various users, because then what's the point of the exercise in the first place?
The whole point is to establish truth, and predictability across methodology.
It should be passively understood that conditional statements are necessary for this thread to work.
SEO doesn't work... under certain conditions, for example.
That's not subjective, but rather conditionally objective, since each condition is objective in nature, and also the final goal is a statement of truth.
If you don't make content, and you don't build links... SEO doesn't work.
Reasonable enough? (LoL)
This would be a great idea, if folks would provide more contextual statements on the conditions of their methods.
With enough feedback, a neat index could be created, which could prove to be a useful reference tool.
I recently created a spreadsheet-based taxonomy for describing the nature of various methods, actually:
Product, Labour, Assets, Traffic, Monetization, Time, Cost, Risk
There is definitely something valuable to determining the nature of the methods you are interested in executing.
In my experience, the risk factor largely determines the capability of any method's potential for success.
The higher your risk factor, the more likely your method will ultimately fail, or at-least become too difficult to maintain without significant adjustment to your approach.
To my knowledge, shark wrestling isn't really a common profession, because the risks are very high. (right? LoL)
Becoming a Shepard, however, comes with much lower risk, and is a much more common profession.
Folks also appreciate lamb chops a bit more than shark meat, I would assume.
Correlatively, spamming YouTube comes with a lot of risks and technical fatigue.
So, while you may be able to have some success with it, it does come with a lot of risk, and so the likelihood of failure is quite high.
It's much easier to start a legit YouTube channel doing simple videos, using simple video editing skills.
That would be a low-risk method, and it also has stable and predictable progress.
For some things, like the internal combustion engine, there is a higher level of risk and difficulty, but if it is executed in steps, then the reward can be excellent.
Some risk is worthwhile, but a large percentage of potential risk is very dangerous.
Risk has to be evaluated.
Some forms of risk can lead to more proprietary products and unique methodology.
However, many forms of risk can have devastating consequences, so I will conclude by saying that it's absolutely essential to evaluate the risk of your methods, and determine if it's manageable, or if it's ultimately dangerous.
Best to you guys in figuring-it-out!
I am not going do that. (hah)
Based on some of the contention, though, I will say that methods are not as subjective as a lot of folks seem to be suggesting.
Yeah, it's captain obvious that you can't just make a blanket statement, like: "SEO doesn't work". (pft)
You also can't argue that it's value enough to say these are all the personal experiences of various users, because then what's the point of the exercise in the first place?
The whole point is to establish truth, and predictability across methodology.
It should be passively understood that conditional statements are necessary for this thread to work.
SEO doesn't work... under certain conditions, for example.
That's not subjective, but rather conditionally objective, since each condition is objective in nature, and also the final goal is a statement of truth.
If you don't make content, and you don't build links... SEO doesn't work.
Reasonable enough? (LoL)
This would be a great idea, if folks would provide more contextual statements on the conditions of their methods.
With enough feedback, a neat index could be created, which could prove to be a useful reference tool.
I recently created a spreadsheet-based taxonomy for describing the nature of various methods, actually:
Product, Labour, Assets, Traffic, Monetization, Time, Cost, Risk
There is definitely something valuable to determining the nature of the methods you are interested in executing.
In my experience, the risk factor largely determines the capability of any method's potential for success.
The higher your risk factor, the more likely your method will ultimately fail, or at-least become too difficult to maintain without significant adjustment to your approach.
To my knowledge, shark wrestling isn't really a common profession, because the risks are very high. (right? LoL)
Becoming a Shepard, however, comes with much lower risk, and is a much more common profession.
Folks also appreciate lamb chops a bit more than shark meat, I would assume.
Correlatively, spamming YouTube comes with a lot of risks and technical fatigue.
So, while you may be able to have some success with it, it does come with a lot of risk, and so the likelihood of failure is quite high.
It's much easier to start a legit YouTube channel doing simple videos, using simple video editing skills.
That would be a low-risk method, and it also has stable and predictable progress.
For some things, like the internal combustion engine, there is a higher level of risk and difficulty, but if it is executed in steps, then the reward can be excellent.
Some risk is worthwhile, but a large percentage of potential risk is very dangerous.
Risk has to be evaluated.
Some forms of risk can lead to more proprietary products and unique methodology.
However, many forms of risk can have devastating consequences, so I will conclude by saying that it's absolutely essential to evaluate the risk of your methods, and determine if it's manageable, or if it's ultimately dangerous.
Best to you guys in figuring-it-out!
Last edited:
Iwearglasses
Junior Member
- Feb 6, 2022
- 167
- 341
Method: Build a social platform
Experience: 2 members and they don’t come back every..
How to improve: Email those 2 members to please come back…
Experience: 2 members and they don’t come back every..
How to improve: Email those 2 members to please come back…
$Hidden$
Junior Member
- Jun 29, 2016
- 169
- 100
Method: Make money on youtube with relaxing music videos/ find clips in pexels and relaxing music/ create relaxing videos/ people will sleep and fart and you will make $3000 a month
Experience: 1 month and 2 youtube strikes
How to improve: a 9 mm Gun and find the mother f**kers who still sharing it on TikTok and blew their heads from 1.5-meter distance "Covid19 safety distance"
Experience: 1 month and 2 youtube strikes
How to improve: a 9 mm Gun and find the mother f**kers who still sharing it on TikTok and blew their heads from 1.5-meter distance "Covid19 safety distance"
- Nov 25, 2017
- 11,571
- 7,556
Methods that doesn't work (for sure)
Anything coming from W+
Anything coming from W+