Discussion in 'White Hat SEO' started by icashmumbai20, May 31, 2012.
moneysite<<social signals(retweets/facebook shares)
moneysite<<high pr wiki
moneysite<<high pr forum profiles/posts
if the above is not enough
moneysite<<high pr blog comments
moneysite<<high PR private blog network
moneysite<<high PR homepage backlinks
if the above is also not enough
tier1<<bulk forum profiles/posts (xrumer)
tier1<<bulk wiki posts (extremewikiposter)
tier1<<bulk blog comments (scrapebox)
tier1<<bulk bookmarks (BMD)
tier1<<bulk social signals (social hub submitter)
tier1<<bulk article directories (AMR)
I want to add to the post of stinkingrich:
1)use Quality multi-spun articles for your first(second) tier web 2.0s
2)use scraped,garbage spun articles,if you are building a small amount of web 2.0s - 4 to 6!Do the 2) apart from the main pyramid/s!(this step is optional)
3)best way - go with the high Quality multi-spun(original) articles for the first(second) tier web 2.0s --- multi-spun(preferred),scraped,garbage spun content for (2nd),3rd,4th+ tier web 2.0s - blast away with the most Quality links(i am not saying what type - High PR profiles/blog comments,etc,etc.) and go with quantity,instead of quality for (2nd),3rd,4th tiers + ...
Do things as random as possible and don't do the typical interlinking!!!That's it!
Diversity your anchor text, and get totally irrelevant anchor text in there e.g click here, check this out, great site, view this etc etc
What the heck. All the is the same silly stuff most people do and it doesn't work well. I mean don't get me wrong it is nothing wrong with getting links from forums, web 2.0 and so on, but most people just don't do it right. Details are very important. Details will make the difference between raising in SERPs and getting penalized.
First off, I assume you folks are lazy or something since all you talk about there are links that can be automated with software. Thing is, that doesn't help much by itself. You need some quality links too, both to the money site and to the tier 1 links. Personally I don't just build web 2.0 for tier 1 but also I actually register domains and build my own network of sites which i can send quality links to since there's no risk of the web 2.0 owners suspending my site and me wasting time with that.
Where do you get quality links? Well, there are tons of places. d0f0llow comments on high pr blogs, manual forum posts on threads that are relevant to your niche. Or with xrumer if you have it, just keep it relevant instead of blasting everything. Then there are guest posts and dozens of other link building methods that work great. They're just not a push-button solution like those crappy mass links. But if you want results then you better stop being lazy and start working. There's a place for automation and there's a place for manual link building.
Also n0f0llow links do not help at all. They only help a page get indexed but will not help it rank. You can build a million n0f0llow links they won't matter. Actually they can hurt you because you will obviously have high link velocity and that will trigger google's filters.
Forum profiles don't work either. They just don't. I could explain you the theory behind it but i doubt it would make a difference.
All Google updates were built as anti-spam measures. In other words what worked 2 years ago still works as long as you're not doing it in a spammy manner. Xrumer, ScrapeBox, UltimateDaemon, SENuke and any other tool can both kill a site, make it rank high or have no effec on it and it is 100% because of how YOU use it. Has nothing to do with the tool. Software is just a tool. You're not skilled with it don't blame the tool.
diversity of anchor text, high PR do follow back linking is essential
high page rank direct to money site and the others in Tier1 as i think will be better and see the result.
Yes that method is good to get best results.We used that and got awesome results.Check it - http://www.toplinkbuilding.org/serp-bomb/
MOD - if this post is not allow,please remove then.
also add forum commenting, pdf creation and yahoo answer in your plan.these activity have good traffic.
I have questions about Web 2.0s.
I know it's probably better to have unique content on them, but once you've created the Web 2.0 and put the article in there, do you keep posting more articles on the Web 2.0 or do you just move on and create another Web 2.0? Is there a negative effect to posting more articles on the same Web 2.0?
At what point would you stop creating Web 2.0s and start juicing them up? At 20/30/40? Web 2.0s and move on to a different link building technique?
And finally, what's the best way of juicing Web 2.0s up? I've heard blasts of Scrapebox, xrummer and bookmarks work. But is it better to blast them with a few quality Scrapebox, xrummer and bookmarks than a giant quantity of them? And should these blasts be drip-fed?
Nicely Explained the Techniques can i know the Exact keyword Search you tested with this method
Thanks for the heads up on the technique. If I can get to the point where I understand more about the techniques involved as a total newbie in SEO, then I will give it a go.
yahoo question & answer
add all there seo technique in your plan
Separate names with a comma.