Linklicious vs. Nuclear Link Crawler

Advertise on BHW
I use backlinksindexer since it does index all my links with no issue. Now that I am getting back into scrapebox blasts then I might check out NLC, I tried linklicious but honestly I didn't feel it was worth the money.
 
i think Linklicious have their own RSS feed directories which seem kind of cool as they can repeat submission untill your link gets crawled by G.
 
ahiddenman said:
I've heard alot of Good things from Nuclear Indexer , Even Dripable uses it and Botwiz said that he gets good results.

Would like to see some REAL Case study results with it as they say all links get crawled guaranteed within 10 minutes which is crazy :)
Click to expand...


Wow, what a blatant lie. Kind of weird they would lie about something like that. (Unless you only have 1 customer) They shouldn't even need to lie about something like that, but it makes me wonder what else they are lying about.

You shouldn't have to lie about something like pinging links...just say what you do, be honest and people will respect it and know what to expect from it.
 
I like linklicious site design, layout, and functionality better than NLC ...BUT NLC does give you twice the amount of free links. Of coarse, both sites have premium versions which offer many more benefits.

@HKSEO Rotzee: I think you guys should match NLC in terms of link volume. I know you give free backlinks but, some people just want the indexing aspect.

@HKSEO Rotzee: You guys also need to add more domains to avoid footprints. I mean seriously how many pings can one domain get before raising some questions from Big G?

@NLC Makers: You guys really need to get rid of the desktop application. I shouldn't have to run software for your service to work. Especially, since you don't disclose what it's actually doing other than running "something".

In Summary, I use both free services. I've considered paid but, I generally like to let links index naturally. When I have used either site to index links I've not noticed any SERP gains but, haven't done any "official testing" just yet.
 
BacklinksIndexer is the most effective one followed by LinkLicious.

It's pointless to sign up for the rest since they all do the same thing.
 
Last edited:
@clade: Not really (@backlinksindexer)...

a) they index way less links (in terms of volume)
b) cost way more
c) can not match indexing volume of other services

Even if their indexing rate is slightly higher you could do 30x or greater the number of urls with other services and optionally build backlinks to your links on your own... In short, the service seems like a ripoff.
 
Last edited:
the_demon said:
@clade: Not really...

a) they index way less links (in terms of volume)
b) cost way more
c) can not match indexing volume of other services
Click to expand...

I was talking about effectiveness though, out of 1k links you submitted to BLI, how many get indexed? how about Linklicious?

On a second thought, Linkdexed.com might be a better option than Linklicious.
 
I'm very happy with Linklicious. We've been using them for a few months now, not a single regret.
 
AHhh. I was just about to ask about this. I love this forum!

I am split between Linklicious, Nuclear Link Crawler, and Backlink Indexer.
 
i have all three linklicious,NLC,NLI.In the case of getting your links crawled both NLC and linklicious are absolutely the same.But none of them will help much to index your backlink.If you are trying to index some not so quality links pointing to your money sites,google will crawl those links and see them not worthy enough to index and devalue ur site.On the other hand NLI will transform your low quality links to quality by backlinkg to them.
 
clade said:
Here you go buddy, http://backlinksindexer.com/comparison

No affiliate links, no ulterior motives. ;)
Click to expand...

Indeed. I've been looking at that. Which is also how I reached the top 3 conclusions. While, BLI seems to have great success rates, it also comes at a steep price for the link limit it offers. (which, I know, in turn, gives the most backlinks for the buck).

However, Senuking 2-3k links per campaign (x2 a day) + AMR's + SB's can be a bit taxing, if I chose BLI. As at the moment (Just started but diving right in), I am not making anything yet (infact, I am in the negatives). Perhaps I just don't quite grasp what I should include in BLI, or for that matter, the others. I am ranking for keywords but.. not quite sure just yet.
 
Last edited:
the_demon said:
I like linklicious site design, layout, and functionality better than NLC ...BUT NLC does give you twice the amount of free links. Of coarse, both sites have premium versions which offer many more benefits.

@HKSEO Rotzee: I think you guys should match NLC in terms of link volume. I know you give free backlinks but, some people just want the indexing aspect.
Click to expand...

If there was enough of a demand, we could look into that.


@HKSEO Rotzee: You guys also need to add more domains to avoid footprints. I mean seriously how many pings can one domain get before raising some questions from Big G?
Click to expand...

We host on many many many domains that we rotate across AND you can host your own domain if you don't want to use our domains. ( I pretty sure KoK from NLC didn't copy that part of us)

NLC also still uses an antiquated RSS Feed method, we used that for quite some time but as of late, while testing millions upon millions link pinging, we found that it has recently started to become less effective compared to dripping direct, which is what we do currently.
 
Just to clarify few things here:

1. NCB software (Desktop software) only for NLC free account, paid user doesn't need that. :)

We use the NCB software to download your campaign and submit to RSS directories, that's all we did, for paid user, we will use our server resources to process that, I think is a fair way.

2. Linklicious might have trouble getting crawl with conventional RSS feeds, but we have discovered a method to continuously submit those feeds, get the backlinks crawl and still remain active. :)

I guess linklicious doesn't know that.

Indexing service link Nuclear Link Indexer or BacklinksIndexer uses much much more resources to get those backlinks index, that's why Indexer are generally higher price.

Linklicious keep telling people there are no difference in crawling and indexing, but I found that high quality links work better with indexing, especially those with uniquely spin content.

The rest I'll leave it to the user to decide, I only share my experience here. :)
 
It's so confusing when everyone throws you in different directions. I just signed up for NLI. Already use Lindexed and Linklicious.
 
Just wanted to update this thread after I stumbled upon a detailed case study on black hat that was done by a black hat member. It compares Linklicious Free account vs Nuclear Link Crawlers free account, against a control that uses neither. Linklicious beat Nuclear Link Crawler in on every keyword. Check it out.


http://www.blackhatworld.com/blackhat-seo/black-hat-seo/401110-case-study-link-building-comparison-chart.html





.
 
Advertise on BHW
You must log in or register to reply here.
Sign up now!

Main Menu

Home Main Forum List Black Hat SEO White Hat SEO BHW Newbie Guide Blogging Black Hat Tools Social Media Downloads

Marketplace

Account Selling Content / Copywriting EBooks / Methods Hosting Misc Proxies For Sale SEO - Link building SEO - Packages Social Media Social Media - Panels Web Design More

Making Money

Affiliate Programs Hire a Freelancer IM Journeys Making Money Pay Per Click Site Flipping Want to Buy

BlackHat World

Dispute Resolution Forum Suggestions & Feedback Introductions Lounge
Back
Top