Linklicious.me now in free open beta
- Thread starter Extropy
- Start date
I have PRO subscription with linklicious and yes there has been a lot of growing/development pains but it seems that they are slowly being able to decrease the amount of errors..
I am pretty happy with the service now after they did their upgrade of their system (think it was sometime last week). Before the upgrade it was almost impossible to use their service.
Now I'm maybe only getting an error every 2/10 times that I add new links. Its a pretty cool service and yes there is a big difference between crawling and indexing but I am willing to fork out 55 bucks a month to increase my chances of my links being indexed.
Crossing my fingers to that all the error messages soon being a thing of the past then this service will be A+. Not sure what the developers are doing to permanently get rid of the errors/system instability but I bet they are working on it.
I am pretty happy with the service now after they did their upgrade of their system (think it was sometime last week). Before the upgrade it was almost impossible to use their service.
Now I'm maybe only getting an error every 2/10 times that I add new links. Its a pretty cool service and yes there is a big difference between crawling and indexing but I am willing to fork out 55 bucks a month to increase my chances of my links being indexed.
Crossing my fingers to that all the error messages soon being a thing of the past then this service will be A+. Not sure what the developers are doing to permanently get rid of the errors/system instability but I bet they are working on it.
Yeah, interestingly we don't have hardware issues but they are software ones. An inefficient query here or there normally isn't a big deal. But when you multiply it by 200 times a second it adds up. If it were just a hardware thing it'd be much easier to fix.
The upshot of all this is your links still get tracked and crawled so that's not lost. This is a service that we use every day so we eat our own dog food.
Thanks for the kind words.
The upshot of all this is your links still get tracked and crawled so that's not lost. This is a service that we use every day so we eat our own dog food.
Thanks for the kind words.
Great service. I was wondering when someone would develop this. You definitely fill a need in our market. This is one of those "why did I think if this" ideas.
Now were able to make everyone of our backlinks count. I was noticing in my own work that I was leaving thousands of backlinks out there that I worked for, and now I can get them indexed.
Now were able to make everyone of our backlinks count. I was noticing in my own work that I was leaving thousands of backlinks out there that I worked for, and now I can get them indexed.
FYI using linklicous in its own will not get your links indexed.
Theres another thread in the black hat seo forum discussing if linklicous is any good for indexing, well I have done my own testing and will post my results below as I did in the other thread-
It seems everyone is pitching in here with various comments but no one seems to have actually done a solid test of sorts. I track everything that I do and measure its impact and effectiveness so I would like to add my feedback here.
I (like most) need a quick way of getting my backlinks INDEXED! I used to use a manual process as follows-
1) seperate links out into groups of 15-25 (batch keyword cleaner)
2) create rss feeds of the links with icerocket (ubot)
3) submit the rss feeds with SENuke and Scrapebox
This actually got very good results without much work at all on my end, the bulk of the work was writring spun titles/descs for the creation of feeds.
The below is taken from my link tracking spreadsheet-
Date Unindexed Links
15/10/2010 2902
21/10/2010 2765
28/10/2010 2109
04/11/2010 1764
11/11/2010 1209
18/11/2010 865
25/11/2010 489
02/12/2010 217
09/12/2010 89
sorry it doesnt line up properly, but you get the idea.
So this month, I gave linklicous paid account a shot to see what it can do in terms of indexing.
On the 5th Feb I loaded 1,647 unindexed backlinks with spun titles and descs like I did above.
Today I have ran an index check and out of the 1,647 backlinks a grand total of 93 are now indexed.
So in summary, linklicious on its own will not get your links indexed. It does what it says on the tin, creates feeds and pings them. At no point has linklicious claimed or siad they will get your links indexed, they clearly say it will get them crawled and I think a lot of newbies are getting 'crawled' and 'indexed' mixed up.
What you need to do to get indexed, is take the feeds linklicous creates and then submit them to rss directorys which is what I will be doing today to complete my personal linklicous test.
Hope thats a bit more constructive to help people understand linklicious a bit better.
Theres another thread in the black hat seo forum discussing if linklicous is any good for indexing, well I have done my own testing and will post my results below as I did in the other thread-
It seems everyone is pitching in here with various comments but no one seems to have actually done a solid test of sorts. I track everything that I do and measure its impact and effectiveness so I would like to add my feedback here.
I (like most) need a quick way of getting my backlinks INDEXED! I used to use a manual process as follows-
1) seperate links out into groups of 15-25 (batch keyword cleaner)
2) create rss feeds of the links with icerocket (ubot)
3) submit the rss feeds with SENuke and Scrapebox
This actually got very good results without much work at all on my end, the bulk of the work was writring spun titles/descs for the creation of feeds.
The below is taken from my link tracking spreadsheet-
Date Unindexed Links
15/10/2010 2902
21/10/2010 2765
28/10/2010 2109
04/11/2010 1764
11/11/2010 1209
18/11/2010 865
25/11/2010 489
02/12/2010 217
09/12/2010 89
sorry it doesnt line up properly, but you get the idea.
So this month, I gave linklicous paid account a shot to see what it can do in terms of indexing.
On the 5th Feb I loaded 1,647 unindexed backlinks with spun titles and descs like I did above.
Today I have ran an index check and out of the 1,647 backlinks a grand total of 93 are now indexed.
So in summary, linklicious on its own will not get your links indexed. It does what it says on the tin, creates feeds and pings them. At no point has linklicious claimed or siad they will get your links indexed, they clearly say it will get them crawled and I think a lot of newbies are getting 'crawled' and 'indexed' mixed up.
What you need to do to get indexed, is take the feeds linklicous creates and then submit them to rss directorys which is what I will be doing today to complete my personal linklicous test.
Hope thats a bit more constructive to help people understand linklicious a bit better.
Alexfrance
Power Member
- Jul 26, 2010
- 685
- 165
Awesome tool that can save a lot of time, also took a paid subscription.
Even if it is not indexed, crawled and pinging of lots of my links spread over a period of time to make it more natural is worth the money for me.
One remark: I prefer payments via Paypal rather than creditcard. If you can add that option, I would feel more comfortable.
Even if it is not indexed, crawled and pinging of lots of my links spread over a period of time to make it more natural is worth the money for me.
One remark: I prefer payments via Paypal rather than creditcard. If you can add that option, I would feel more comfortable.
suyvv
BANNED
- May 21, 2009
- 83
- 5
Hey guys! I really need your advices:
I have input 6000+ trackback or pingback links of my website into the system yesterday, these are the links I built over the course of a year, this website is 1 year age, it was ranking on from top 5 to page 3 for many keywords in the niche.
I set 30 links per feed and Ping 1 feed every 1 hr, the rest I used default setting.
Today I found my website's dropped to 70 to a few hundred position, I'm not sure if it's just google dance or sandbox.
But I want to know what should I do? I have scheduled the feeds, should I let them continue to ping?
More importantly, what do you think will be the best strategy for now to get the site back again?
Thanks in advance and I'll be really appreciate your input!!
I have input 6000+ trackback or pingback links of my website into the system yesterday, these are the links I built over the course of a year, this website is 1 year age, it was ranking on from top 5 to page 3 for many keywords in the niche.
I set 30 links per feed and Ping 1 feed every 1 hr, the rest I used default setting.
Today I found my website's dropped to 70 to a few hundred position, I'm not sure if it's just google dance or sandbox.
But I want to know what should I do? I have scheduled the feeds, should I let them continue to ping?
More importantly, what do you think will be the best strategy for now to get the site back again?
Thanks in advance and I'll be really appreciate your input!!
@suyvv- That's the Google dance for sure and it should be back in a day or three. You moved it off of the default settings to 500 links/day - so hopefully it isn't a brand new site or it may take longer. Even my older sites I don't go over 200 or 300/day. That's the whole point of dripping these out.
I'd let them continue to ping and slowly continue building more links. You'll be back before you know it and now you know the limit of that site before you get a hard dance...
I'd let them continue to ping and slowly continue building more links. You'll be back before you know it and now you know the limit of that site before you get a hard dance...
suyvv
BANNED
- May 21, 2009
- 83
- 5
Hey Extropy, so how many pings per day will you suggest for now? 200 or 300 or even less?
On the other hand, I didn't ping in the last 2 days since the dance, is it a good idea to just stop all the pingings and wait till it get back then start to slowly ping again?
Fyi the site is still in the sandbox after 3 days, only a few keywords moved a few spots up...
On the other hand, I didn't ping in the last 2 days since the dance, is it a good idea to just stop all the pingings and wait till it get back then start to slowly ping again?
Fyi the site is still in the sandbox after 3 days, only a few keywords moved a few spots up...
GoogleAlchemist
Regular Member
- Nov 25, 2009
- 320
- 44
Even though this hasnt been updated in months for some reason? Figure I'll post here vs make a new one
Linklicious looks solid with the paid options. Only thing that stands out to me that I wanted feedback on is that the $15/mo plan uses licious shortener for everything while the $55/mo plan lets us use our own domain.
Now I wouldnt ideally want a footprint coming from one single domain of mine,,,but I sure as heck dont want it coming from an advertised service like this that is also being used by hundreds or thousands of other customers of varying degrees of spamminess.
I can understand the $40/mo jump for being able to process so many more links, thats fine. But why should it be tacked on for simply using our own domain vs yours?
I would like to give this a go, but that's the only sticking point for me atm thanks for any response.
Linklicious looks solid with the paid options. Only thing that stands out to me that I wanted feedback on is that the $15/mo plan uses licious shortener for everything while the $55/mo plan lets us use our own domain.
Now I wouldnt ideally want a footprint coming from one single domain of mine,,,but I sure as heck dont want it coming from an advertised service like this that is also being used by hundreds or thousands of other customers of varying degrees of spamminess.
I can understand the $40/mo jump for being able to process so many more links, thats fine. But why should it be tacked on for simply using our own domain vs yours?
I would like to give this a go, but that's the only sticking point for me atm thanks for any response.
Poppa Rotzee
Power Member
- Apr 10, 2011
- 511
- 163
We have to create some value for the pro users...and this is one of the added perks. For what its worth..we don't use a custom domain for our own customers. We leave it to the default setting, which is a random domain out of the 20 that we use.
In the close to a year that we have being doing this...we have not seen any problems. We do case studies and track everything and would not do something if we thought it wasn't safe.