Linklicious and??

I know Linklicious is a "crawler" , is it worth getting a "indexer" as well, or is that completely useless to do? If I had to do just one, shout in be linklicious or ??????

Thanks

In my (biased) opinion, crawling is sufficient. You can spend $5 on links and $20 on indexing. Or just spend $25 on links.

Obviously indexed links are more important than non-indexed links. But as long as Google knows about your links your SERPs will go up.

My suggestion (if you really want to) is to try out both and see what works best for you. We're all about testing our theories and getting the biggest bang for our SEO buck. Understand how things work and why they work and it'll help you long term.

I also think that crawling is good enough, and i personally use linklicious and like it.

Good stuff, think I'm just going to stick with it by itself... Thanks

Tdal21 said:

Good stuff, think I'm just going to stick with it by itself... Thanks

Click to expand...

I think you will be safe with that decision, let us know how it goes or if you have any questions!

Tdal21 said:

I know Linklicious is a "crawler" , is it worth getting a "indexer" as well, or is that completely useless to do? If I had to do just one, shout in be linklicious or ??????

Thanks

Click to expand...

The problem with indexers is that they often cost more than the links you are trying to get indexed...

If you are talking about Xrumer profiles, LinkLicious is the only viable option, financially speaking.

I tend to use Xrumer profiles for indexing, and other than LinkLicious would not consider anything else in that regard.

On this matter my approach is "look up not down"

Instead of looking down at indexing tools below your raft of junk profiles, look up at your next tier and concentrate on that.

For the price of an indexing service you can buy quite a lot of better quality links, buy access to a half decent blog network, buy a couple of expired PR3's per month... all much better use of funds than getting no mark profiles indexed.