I have used LinkPushing. It should be a little easier to add your own article though, but it is pretty easy to do if you just submit and then later go back in and edit it.
It's easy to sign up, easy to make the link push (actually - very easy - this is a selling point).
However, to really get maximum benefit out of it you really need to ensure the content is relevant (IMO). As much as the content is just there to 'let you' get a link on the respective site, I think that just posting any content is not going to give decent results.
I subscribed to 12 link pushes, and I mostly let it just use the random content it picked up and I have not yet noticed results. However, the sites I was aiming at were mostly already on page 1, just wanting to move them up a little. These were low comp. KW's as they're targeting local search terms in Aus.
Also, the 12 link pushes were not all sent to one site, but split up. Perhaps I would have had better results just using all 12 on one site instead of splitting them up. So I am open to that as a factor in the smaller SERP movements.
They also need to be fed more junk links (that is, the LP's) for max benefit. Feeding them more links gives more power and will help in indexing.
Overall, my opinion at this point is neutral as the service is easy to set up - but I have not seen any SERP movement.
On the other hand, if anyone is looking for an automated service, you can try and check out www.backlinksgenie.com - they are pretty pricey too (but LP can be as well).
With BLG, you can choose premade 2,3 or 4 day projects where it will build your Tier 1, Tier 2 etc etc. I have had good success with BLG by also submitting links to Lindexed.com for indexing and by also feeding them with Dripable.com.
PS: Not affiliated with any of these services.
It's easy to sign up, easy to make the link push (actually - very easy - this is a selling point).
However, to really get maximum benefit out of it you really need to ensure the content is relevant (IMO). As much as the content is just there to 'let you' get a link on the respective site, I think that just posting any content is not going to give decent results.
I subscribed to 12 link pushes, and I mostly let it just use the random content it picked up and I have not yet noticed results. However, the sites I was aiming at were mostly already on page 1, just wanting to move them up a little. These were low comp. KW's as they're targeting local search terms in Aus.
Also, the 12 link pushes were not all sent to one site, but split up. Perhaps I would have had better results just using all 12 on one site instead of splitting them up. So I am open to that as a factor in the smaller SERP movements.
They also need to be fed more junk links (that is, the LP's) for max benefit. Feeding them more links gives more power and will help in indexing.
Overall, my opinion at this point is neutral as the service is easy to set up - but I have not seen any SERP movement.
On the other hand, if anyone is looking for an automated service, you can try and check out www.backlinksgenie.com - they are pretty pricey too (but LP can be as well).
With BLG, you can choose premade 2,3 or 4 day projects where it will build your Tier 1, Tier 2 etc etc. I have had good success with BLG by also submitting links to Lindexed.com for indexing and by also feeding them with Dripable.com.
PS: Not affiliated with any of these services.