Licorne AIO Review
- Thread starter zee007
- Start date
makeitrain85
Regular Member
- Nov 4, 2009
- 237
- 28
I bought it a month ago. Its hard to use and confusing.
twilightofidols
Power Member
- Nov 11, 2011
- 675
- 227
Read their sales thread OP
cutekid1
Regular Member
- Sep 30, 2012
- 290
- 124
zee007
Senior Member
- Jun 25, 2012
- 828
- 105
I know what you mean. I've used Magic Submitter (overly cumbersome), senuke is good, but expensive. Best so far are UD and GSA. Both tools are completely different in their UI, but are very intuitive. Clyde also builds some great, simple tools.
notyourmatey
Power Member
- Jul 7, 2011
- 572
- 328
i dont know how it is hard- you set up project, there is a wizard ( in latest version) which guides you through steps hit submit and wait for submission.
clyde
Elite Member
- Dec 5, 2009
- 1,990
- 1,136
Thank you!
Don't forget to check out SE Demon when it comes out, we're launching big on BHW mid-March so get excited!
huntytigger
Junior Member
- Dec 6, 2012
- 164
- 17
UI is confusing and some unneeded clicks. You need to have some knowledge.
For example if you wanna wiki article submit you have to know if you have to first create an account task. After finishes you have to know if you need to create a profile? Or you just have to only article submit? What you have to do for web2.0? and there is web2.0 properties, web2.0 profiles, web2.0 profilesandproperties lists. And many more Lists you have to decide what you have to do. At least for me confusing.
There is no 2.53 guide around all video guides with old v1 UI. And v1 is different from v2. Not much posts on the forums also.
Support is helpful software is getting better everyday. They are listening everyone. Next update i hope will be a solution for many problems.
And support told me that there is a bug with report. Success is much more than actually reported.
I wish support will spend more time on making the software more stable, solid and user friendly than adding new features an making it more confusing.
For example if you wanna wiki article submit you have to know if you have to first create an account task. After finishes you have to know if you need to create a profile? Or you just have to only article submit? What you have to do for web2.0? and there is web2.0 properties, web2.0 profiles, web2.0 profilesandproperties lists. And many more Lists you have to decide what you have to do. At least for me confusing.
There is no 2.53 guide around all video guides with old v1 UI. And v1 is different from v2. Not much posts on the forums also.
Support is helpful software is getting better everyday. They are listening everyone. Next update i hope will be a solution for many problems.
And support told me that there is a bug with report. Success is much more than actually reported.
I wish support will spend more time on making the software more stable, solid and user friendly than adding new features an making it more confusing.
MatthewWoodward
Senior Member
- Aug 31, 2012
- 997
- 1,728
Hi,
Actually the creators of this approached me to create a detailed review of the software and I have to agree there is a serious lack of 'training' available showing you how to use it.
So I'm going to solve all of that with my review which is due in the next week or so - there will also be a competition with some licenses up for grabs as well.
Actually the creators of this approached me to create a detailed review of the software and I have to agree there is a serious lack of 'training' available showing you how to use it.
So I'm going to solve all of that with my review which is due in the next week or so - there will also be a competition with some licenses up for grabs as well.
zee007
Senior Member
- Jun 25, 2012
- 828
- 105
Actually, if you read the user manual, its pretty easy. And the process is the same for these types of software. You always have to create a project, then account and a task (bookmarks etc).
I do wish that they could skip this account creation part and integrate it into one step (account + task).
Matthew, maybe you can make the suggestion? UD is probably the best of all the integrated link building tools. Simple, extensive and straightforward.
I do wish that they could skip this account creation part and integrate it into one step (account + task).
Matthew, maybe you can make the suggestion? UD is probably the best of all the integrated link building tools. Simple, extensive and straightforward.
I had the same experience with bookmarks, I bought GSA instead of Licorne
0_00_0
Senior Member
- Oct 7, 2010
- 1,027
- 494
It is great. I picked it up before it becomes a monthly fee. There is so much potential and the support takes everyone's recommendations into consideration. Once it comes out of beta it will be a beast. It is a bit of a confusing ui at the moment but they will make it better I'm sure of it. I bought it even though I have lifetime senuke sub.
crazedspyker
Senior Member
- Jan 5, 2010
- 1,004
- 661
I love the software. I can see where people who don't have experience with tools may have some trouble though. (But that applies for just about any tool)
I migrated from UD so I picked up Licorne and I was up and creating campaigns with customs lists in under an hour. Didn't need any manual or anything since most of the features I use are pretty easy to figure out just by fiddling around. As for success rate, I get a much higher success rate than UD and cloning tasks is super fast which makes it an awesome tool for Tier 3 links. I'm happy I bought it at the introductory price.
After cleaning up the list (imported from UD), I get about a 95% success rate on both registration and submission. Submission to article sites might need a bit work though.
I haven't figured out a way to use it for tier 1/2 yet, but once Licorne cosmic is a bit more stable I might drop UD altogether.
I migrated from UD so I picked up Licorne and I was up and creating campaigns with customs lists in under an hour. Didn't need any manual or anything since most of the features I use are pretty easy to figure out just by fiddling around. As for success rate, I get a much higher success rate than UD and cloning tasks is super fast which makes it an awesome tool for Tier 3 links. I'm happy I bought it at the introductory price.
After cleaning up the list (imported from UD), I get about a 95% success rate on both registration and submission. Submission to article sites might need a bit work though.
I haven't figured out a way to use it for tier 1/2 yet, but once Licorne cosmic is a bit more stable I might drop UD altogether.
Last edited:
Matthew, how's your training/review video coming along? I've been very impressed with your other training videos on your blog so I'm waiting eagerly for this one.
Having recently purchased Licorne AIO and being new to the world of automated link building, I would greatly appreciate some tutorials from someone who knows how to get the best from this kind of software.
Cheers...
makeitrain85
Regular Member
- Nov 4, 2009
- 237
- 28
This is my take on this after doing like 5-6 test runs:
- Low success rates
- Unnecessary steps and Account naming
- Lots of Web2.0 don't have passwords after you created them. For some reason the software doesn't do it for you.
- Bookmarking sucks (submission)
- If you close Lincorne AIO and forgot to click Yes to save to Achieve all your recent works will be lost.
- Confusing and non-user friendly interface. I can't separate wikis and web2.0s ...
Of course for the price it is pretty decent software. Senuke is very easy to use but too expensive. Your choice.
- Low success rates
- Unnecessary steps and Account naming
- Lots of Web2.0 don't have passwords after you created them. For some reason the software doesn't do it for you.
- Bookmarking sucks (submission)
- If you close Lincorne AIO and forgot to click Yes to save to Achieve all your recent works will be lost.
- Confusing and non-user friendly interface. I can't separate wikis and web2.0s ...
Of course for the price it is pretty decent software. Senuke is very easy to use but too expensive. Your choice.