Latest Google Rater Guidelines Leaked

0scan0 · Nov 17, 2015

So rumors say that the latest Google Search Quality Rating Guidelines is out, (dating October 2015)
Source: http://searchengineland.com/google-search-quality-raters-handbook-updated-with-mobile-guidelines-local-queries-know-queries-236174

I know that some of you have it, please share it. If you don't want to share it in public, please PM me the link where I can download it and I will give you 15 dollar through PayPal for the hassle.

diesel1 · Nov 17, 2015

.

Perhaps this will help you...

http://www.thesempost.com/google-quality-raters-guide-mobile/

0scan0 · Nov 17, 2015

Thanks, but it was linked to from the SEL post so I have seen it. I want the whole thing

CrazyBuddy · Nov 17, 2015

Can someone elaborate and explain the "Changing Dates" section .

0scan0 · Nov 17, 2015

CrazyBuddy said:
Can someone elaborate and explain the "Changing Dates" section .

I guess it is related to the fresh content and news content ranking boost that is a discussed part of the algo. And some webmasters edit the published date of the articles to gain this boost even though they in fact did not update the content.

Quality raters are therefore instructed to check for the change in content by using Wayback Machine.

0scan0 · Nov 19, 2015

Come on guys, we need this document.
Someone have had any luck in finding it?

accelerator_dd · Nov 19, 2015

0scan0 said:
I guess it is related to the fresh content and news content ranking boost that is a discussed part of the algo. And some webmasters edit the published date of the articles to gain this boost even though they in fact did not update the content.

Quality raters are therefore instructed to check for the change in content by using Wayback Machine.

I bet they have their own internal Wayback machine alternative. It's not that hard to put together, and they have the means/talent to do it. Not to mention how valuable of a resource it can be for them.

RuthSam · Nov 19, 2015

Thank you very much for sharing.. there is some good news in this article http://www.thesempost.com/google-quality-raters-guide-mobile/ I'm working on some of it now.

The Almighty · Nov 19, 2015

Thanks for sharing

bartosimpsonio · Nov 19, 2015

Anyone have the full PDF?

Wilson Grant Fisk · Nov 19, 2015

bartosimpsonio said:
Anyone have the full PDF?

I did a search but couldn't find it, which is surprising.
Also makes me doubtful whether the author of that piece really did get her hands on a copy or just some nice speculation on her part.

bartosimpsonio · Nov 19, 2015

W130SN said:
I did a search but couldn't find it, which is surprising.
Also makes me doubtful whether the author of that piece really did get her hands on a copy or just some nice speculation on her part.

Brother, if you can't find it I'm not even gonna try LOL

0scan0 · Nov 19, 2015

RuthSam said:
Thank you very much for sharing.. there is some good news in this article http://www.thesempost.com/google-quality-raters-guide-mobile/ I'm working on some of it now.

Yes I know, but I want the whole thing.
She said this in the comment section "Sorry, I promised not to distribute it... not to mention I don't own it either, it technically belongs to Google"

Baah, what kind of teasing is that?! Not ok!

asap1 · Nov 19, 2015

Damn i never even knew about this Google Rater stuff.

bartosimpsonio · Nov 19, 2015

asap1 said:
Damn i never even knew about this Google Rater stuff.

It's the real engine behind Google ranking.

diesel1 · Nov 20, 2015

.

Here's the Google post about it..

http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.co.za/2015/11/updating-our-search-quality-rating.html

0scan0 · Nov 20, 2015

So G just went public with it and can be find here: http://static.googleusercontent.com/media/www.google.com/en//insidesearch/howsearchworks/assets/searchqualityevaluatorguidelines.pdf

160 pages

Wilson Grant Fisk · Nov 20, 2015

diesel1 said:
.

Here's the Google post about it..

http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.co.za/2015/11/updating-our-search-quality-rating.html

0scan0 said:
So G just went public with it and can be find here: http://static.googleusercontent.com...s/assets/searchqualityevaluatorguidelines.pdf

160 pages

I swear that I checked that address yesterday and it was an old outdated version.

Jonaz86 · Nov 25, 2015

What exactly makes this trustworthy? I mean what makes you guys believe Google in this case? They could pretty much say whatever just to keep healthy seo practises in place?

Latest Google Rater Guidelines Leaked

Junior Member

Senior Member

Junior Member

Power Member

Junior Member

Junior Member

Elite Member

BANNED

Registered Member

Elite Member

Elite Member

Elite Member

Junior Member

BANNED

Elite Member

Senior Member

Junior Member

Elite Member

Junior Member

Main Menu

Marketplace

Making Money

BlackHat World