Keyword stuffing DOES work

wilfy said:
I've ranked videos were the strong keywords are the 1 2 and 4 words and outranked others were the same competing keywords were set 1 2 3, so I don't think this "3 first keywords" applies exactly. At the end of the day we are only guessing here unless you work at Google and can see the source code for Youtube.
Click to expand...
If you read through my thread you will see I am privy to information that is not in the public domain.
I chat to a strategist that works with large channels to make them blow up.
As stated in my posts, there is a limit to what he will divulge to me as I am not a client.
There is also a limit to what I can divulge on here, as I want to use some of that knowledge to benefit my own channel.
When I say front loading 3 keywords produces desirable results; it is fact. Not my opinion. Fact.
If there was another better method, I would be using it on every one of my 174 videos.
I chatted to a larger channel than my own, that also uses a strategist; and asked why they had reduced the number of keywords on all their videos to 3; following an algorithm update.
When I looked at the analytics for their channel, rather than the views dipping post update, there was an uptick in views; which was the direct product of changing to 3 front loaded keywords.
"I've ranked videos were the strong keywords are the 1 2 and 4 words and outranked others were the same competing keywords were set 1 2 3"
The front loading of 3 keywords beneficial effect is multiplied when my methods is used; 3 keywords in, video file, video title, video description, community post.
I am confident that the channels you are comparing your "1, 2, and 4" method to are not using my method as described.
Many channels upload the video file as 123456.mp4 etc. They aren't aware of the importance of renaming the video file to the 3 keywords prior to uploading.
"At the end of the day we are only guessing here unless you work at Google and can see the source code for Youtube."
No, I am not guessing. I am applying a method which is being used by large channels, and a method which is used by a strategist behind large channels.
Strategists do not work directly for YouTube, they pay enormous amounts to gain the content of algorithm updates.
This is how they can make a channel blow up. See graphs posted in my thread, where I detail this.
For example, from 2019 to 2021 this strategist took a channel from 0-520K subscribers, from 0-42.5M views.
The channel also uses 3 front loaded key words in every video title, video description, community post; as per my method detailed.
When I see outdated, or nonsense information posted on here as fact; I correct it with current information; for the benefit of us all.
It is draining when someone like yourself questions my integrity, and I have to explain in detail my knowledge is greater; as I have explained here.
 
Advertise on BHW
wilfy said:
I've ranked videos were the strong keywords are the 1 2 and 4 words and outranked others were the same competing keywords were set 1 2 3, so I don't think this "3 first keywords" applies exactly. At the end of the day we are only guessing here unless you work at Google and can see the source code for Youtube.
Click to expand...

This is what I mean. Everyone thinks they know everything. The reality is, nobody really knows unless they are the actual programmers for YT/Google, which makes me wonder if those employees actually make their own yt channels and other social media stuff since they have the keys to the "secret sauce" lol.

We can only know from our experiences. If you've had success, good for you. You can only share what worked for you. Everyday these forums are filled with claims like, "How to make $500 day" or "How I grew my channel to make me $10k month"...take everything with a grain of salt. Most claims are just assumptions.
 
"If you read through my thread you will see - I am privy to - information that is not in the public domain."
You posted it? It's Private? Lost.
 
oatmeal said:
Everyday these forums are filled with claims like, "How to make $500 day" or "How I grew my channel to make me $10k month"...take everything with a grain of salt. Most claims are just assumptions.
Click to expand...
Guilty in the copy department... But come over to my journey and see that I also admit that thinking big means being buried up to the neck in shitpiles of "I don't knows" before you make it and systematize it for passive income.
 
timothywcrane said:
Guilty in the copy department... But come over to my journey and see that I also admit that thinking big means being buried up to the neck in shitpiles of "I don't knows" before you make it and systematize it for passive income.
Click to expand...

I really think they should create a subject or course called "Passive income" in elementary, middle, hs, and college/unv. It requires a lot of training, practice, educating, studying, and years and years of perfecting it. Plus, there are so many different methods to make passive income but the problem is educating people how to do it. I guess it's because "they" don't want you to know how to do it cuz then nobody would want to work those slave 9-5 jobs anymore lol. What a sick world we live in. It's like trying to keep people from learning how to read because we don't want everyone to be literate, else the rich, smart, and powerful can't manipulate the lesser mortals anymore and keep them down for their own benefit. Makes you wonder, are we still living in a pyramid scheme where only a few can reach the top and in order to reach it, they need the masses to climb on top of to get there? Or is it possible to flip the pyramid upside down and teach everyone to now be wealthy and successful without having to have a pile of poor people beneath you?
 
I'm keyword stuffing the description and ranking for around 15+ keywords in position 1-3.

In the next video I'm going to do 20 and see if I can rank for all of them.
 
timothywcrane said:
"If you read through my thread you will see - I am privy to - information that is not in the public domain."
You posted it? It's Private? Lost.
Click to expand...
Read through this thread.
https://www.blackhatworld.com/seo/tips-to-help-your-youtube-channel.1360658/
 
Long Runs The Fox said:
If you read through my thread you will see I am privy to information that is not in the public domain.
I chat to a strategist that works with large channels to make them blow up.
As stated in my posts, there is a limit to what he will divulge to me as I am not a client.
There is also a limit to what I can divulge on here, as I want to use some of that knowledge to benefit my own channel.
When I say front loading 3 keywords produces desirable results; it is fact. Not my opinion. Fact.
If there was another better method, I would be using it on every one of my 174 videos.
I chatted to a larger channel than my own, that also uses a strategist; and asked why they had reduced the number of keywords on all their videos to 3; following an algorithm update.
When I looked at the analytics for their channel, rather than the views dipping post update, there was an uptick in views; which was the direct product of changing to 3 front loaded keywords.
"I've ranked videos were the strong keywords are the 1 2 and 4 words and outranked others were the same competing keywords were set 1 2 3"
The front loading of 3 keywords beneficial effect is multiplied when my methods is used; 3 keywords in, video file, video title, video description, community post.
I am confident that the channels you are comparing your "1, 2, and 4" method to are not using my method as described.
Many channels upload the video file as 123456.mp4 etc. They aren't aware of the importance of renaming the video file to the 3 keywords prior to uploading.
"At the end of the day we are only guessing here unless you work at Google and can see the source code for Youtube."
No, I am not guessing. I am applying a method which is being used by large channels, and a method which is used by a strategist behind large channels.
Strategists do not work directly for YouTube, they pay enormous amounts to gain the content of algorithm updates.
This is how they can make a channel blow up. See graphs posted in my thread, where I detail this.
For example, from 2019 to 2021 this strategist took a channel from 0-520K subscribers, from 0-42.5M views.
The channel also uses 3 front loaded key words in every video title, video description, community post; as per my method detailed.
When I see outdated, or nonsense information posted on here as fact; I correct it with current information; for the benefit of us all.
It is draining when someone like yourself questions my integrity, and I have to explain in detail my knowledge is greater; as I have explained here.
Click to expand...
Right so you are saying you are in contact with some sort elite clique which is able to buy "content algorithm updates" from some Youtube employee whistleblower. I will believe this if you can post actual source code of Youtube, otherwise anyone could come up with some half assed claims and point to how this and that big channel uses this and then sell it for big bucks.
It's draining when someone makes big claims and then cries when they are asked to post proof.
 
999michaelh said:
Please correct me if I'm wrong but... I've looked at several large channels and they all do keyword stuffing in their descriptions, like 20-30 keywords.

So many people have said that keyword stuffing is outdated and no longer works.

However, when I open an incognito browser and search for those keywords(some of them are pretty big), maybe like 40-50% of the time, I see the channel's videos. They literally use the keyword once when keyword stuffing and I see it in the search results. It's not just low competition keywords, some of them are pretty competitive...

If this is the case, why
Click to expand...
Keyword stuffing certainly works, but when it comes to articles, it makes them sound unnatural. It is hard to get anything to sound natural with keyword stuffing, but if the goal is just to get noticed, then it might be a good option. However, algorithms might eventually pick up on this and you'll be banned or at the very least penalized.
 
Keyword stuffing could work with parasites & Youtube SEO, but not with the medium & small websites,
it will simply result in getting you down in the SERPs instead, just like an over optimised anchor text ratio would do
 
Advertise on BHW
You must log in or register to reply here.
Sign up now!

Main Menu

Home Main Forum List Black Hat SEO White Hat SEO BHW Newbie Guide Blogging Black Hat Tools Social Media Downloads

Marketplace

Account Selling Content / Copywriting EBooks / Methods Hosting Misc Proxies For Sale SEO - Link building SEO - Packages Social Media Social Media - Panels Web Design More

Making Money

Affiliate Programs Hire a Freelancer IM Journeys Making Money Pay Per Click Site Flipping Want to Buy

BlackHat World

Dispute Resolution Forum Suggestions & Feedback Introductions Lounge
Back
Top