Keyword research > SEO
- Thread starter Danezz
- Start date
- Nov 25, 2017
- 11,570
- 7,545
what is the question?
CyberHour
Elite Member
- Apr 3, 2016
- 1,705
- 932
There is no question.
- Oct 28, 2020
- 11,663
- 14,613
there's no question. OP just wanted to show us that keyword research is better than SEO because the site he's showing in this image has only 8 backlinks but tons of traffic which - in the absence of lots of backlinks - could have only come as a result of good keyword research. At least that's how I interpret that image
moonshine7000
Elite Member
- Mar 4, 2013
- 4,359
- 3,999
Yes but you will easily get crushed by high authority competitors that started to compete with you for those same keywords.
VortexAlpha
Senior Member
- Sep 13, 2021
- 1,053
- 267
Could be, but anyhow, keyword research is also a part of SEO, if you want to work on ranking, you have to find the most relevant keywords first, so I don't really see much difference here.there's no question. OP just wanted to show us that keyword research is better than SEO because the site he's showing in this image has only 8 backlinks but tons of traffic which - in the absence of lots of backlinks - could have only come as a result of good keyword research. At least that's how I interpret that image
I thought exactly the same, keywords are a huge part of SEO !
- Oct 28, 2020
- 11,663
- 14,613
Many newbies use the words SEO and "link building" interchangeably, so most likely this is the case here, as well. But yeah, you're right
OlafRustle
Senior Member
- Dec 7, 2018
- 1,053
- 1,246
Engine > cars
- Feb 28, 2019
- 7,441
- 7,895
This is only true for some niches. Most mainstream niches cover keywords that don't even exist.
divlev
Newbie
- Nov 18, 2021
- 17
- 5
What's the niche of this site?
Assad Hameed
Newbie
- Jan 3, 2022
- 2
- 0
Welcome to HBW mate
- Dec 13, 2020
- 438
- 253
I do not see keyword research as part of search engine optimization. (prove me wrong) Keyword density, internal links with anchors, etc. they are, so actually the title was not correct as those were used. I meant > links.