jasper VS sensit?

If you want volume, decent quality content that can rank, go with Sensit, this is what I'm saying. Its changed my business. I mentioned previously that I had a team of 5 "writers" using my Boss Mode Jasper account to generate high volumes of content every month. I have been able to replace these 5 staff with Sensit.

This is all I have been saying.

debakid said:

I tried it for a bit, but not the autopilot, because it wanted me to put credit card info. It did spit out some good short results. I do not doubt that it is a good tool. Just doubting that it is better than Jasper AI. The whole world would be talking about it by now.

For a new tool that wants its share in the congested AI market, it should allow more trials, be on appsumo, etc... otherwise, it is DOA

Click to expand...

Jasper got in early and has excellent marketing. But now they're just an overpriced fancy interface to the OpanAI platform.

Jasper doesn't create their own AI, they just created an interface to connect to the OpenAI GPT3 model (which also owns GPTChat. Comparing ChatGPT and Jasper doesn't make sense). Anyone can do this, which is why there are so many similar services out there. If comparing AI technology, then OpenAI is the leader in the field, and they're funded by large corporations like Microsoft.

So if I find a guy on BHW building their own AI and doing an excellent job at it (based on my testing), then I want to spread their brand to help the owners and to help end-users find out about these excellent services.

drstew said:

When in actual fact, I've been selling domains and PBN-related services since 2010 and have had Spamzilla's BST on here since 2018. So yes, I need a lot of content quickly and as cheaply as possible while also maintaining some quality.

I'm sharing this knowledge with this great community.

Click to expand...

What about google ai detect ? How do you deal with that. Spamzilla, very fine product...

debakid said:

What about google ai detect ? How do you deal with that. Spamzilla, very fine product...

Click to expand...

Google doesn't care if it's AI or Human content. If it's shit content, the Google Algo won't like it.

Check this from Google
I've been ranking 100% AI-detectable content (from Jasper) since May this year. But I don't just slap up AI content, I pass the AI-generated content to my formatting team, who manually build out the images, internal links, schema, meta stuff etc.

Essentially you should wrap up the AI content with some human touches to improve the user experience metrics. Google Helpful content means they've added more weight to the user metrics.

This is much easier and cheaper for Google than detecting AI content across the entire internet (which would be impossible with all the different NLP models being released and fine tunning etc.), and they don't want all the SEO's spamming out 100k pages of shitty content as this will consume their crawlers. If AI content answers the query while the website shows good user metrics, then the algo will rank it.

Thanks, this helps a lot.