I don't particularly mind a badly written article, I have accepted plenty in the past, at least they are more likely to be unique. Afterall, it's only ever for a pbn.
I'm more surprised at the prevalence of the situation.
Fair enough the example I showed was a 3 star fly by night, but I ended up having to flag a 4.2 star writer I had used a couple of times.
Anyone using the platform is in with a very good chance of receiving non unique articles.
I'm no stranger to the platform, having spent well over $400 dollars over the past few years.
Sometimes I want a cheap article to fill a web 2.0 or Pbn, other times I want something more substantial. I've had duplicate content for both low tier and premium tiers. So saying I need to be more careful about my writers is not really an excuse. I had thought I was careful and wouldn't have looked into it more if I hadn't received the same article multiple times.
I challenge anyone to request an article and manually check the content, I'm sure there's at least a 50% chance of duplicate content, even if premium tiers are chosen