It's 2015. Can we stop using the term "Web 2.0"?
- Thread starter wrxSTi
- Start date
wrxSTi
Newbie
- Jan 28, 2015
- 46
- 14
No it's not. I don't know why my post count is frozen.
Anyways I'm sure I'll get a lot of hate for this, but for some reason the term Web 2.0 just irks me. It's called a website. Web 2.0 is a buzzword from the era of Netscape.
It's not frozen; post count in the Lounge just not count.
Anyways, whatever it's called that's it!
- Jun 20, 2013
- 11,253
- 8,607
Very day a new discovery.
BHopkins
Elite Member
- Dec 31, 2010
- 2,609
- 1,752
There is a definition problem. Most people consider a website, anything with a TLD. A domain is .com/net/org website that you own while a web 2.0 is a third party owned site. I've never really liked the term either but it's the most common phrase to describe a website that you don't own but allows you to create accounts and/or publish content.
BHopkins
Elite Member
- Dec 31, 2010
- 2,609
- 1,752
It's in the lounge, it doesn't have to matter, that's the beauty of the lounge!
Zwielicht
Elite Member
- Aug 31, 2013
- 21,175
- 40,486
Web 3.0? That's it? Ha, I'm already on Virtual Reality Web 4000.0.
BHopkins
Elite Member
- Dec 31, 2010
- 2,609
- 1,752
Web 3.0? That's it? Ha, I'm already on Virtual Reality Web 4000.0.
4000.0 is buggy, upgrade to 4000.1.
Ambitious12
Elite Member
- Jun 26, 2014
- 3,109
- 617
Okay just tell us,why should we call it Web 3.0 when we already heard about Super Web 2.0
BHopkins
Elite Member
- Dec 31, 2010
- 2,609
- 1,752
Okay just tell us,why should we call it Web 3.0 when we already heard about Super Web 2.0
I'm with Ambitious12, Super Web 2.0's. Are they really an upgrade worth calling web 3.0?
Zwielicht
Elite Member
- Aug 31, 2013
- 21,175
- 40,486
Whoa, I had heard rumours about 4000.1, but I didn't think it actually existed!
BHopkins
Elite Member
- Dec 31, 2010
- 2,609
- 1,752
I don't mean to brag, but I know people. I've been a beta tester since 2000.0.