Guys, the turing spinner is not a simple spinner.
Well how much english content have you tested and in comparison to what other software?Well if you look at the output of the "readable" content option it looks like it comes from a simple spinner, and if you go higher to something like super readable the content is far from unique, i guess i must be missing why you guys seem to like Wordai cus my test shows nothing more but poor spung content.
Well how much english content have you tested and in comparison to what other software?
Yikes, so that's even worse. I can signup for 2.5M words that is "standard" quality. Or I can signup for 250,000 words with the good 'turing' quality. It doesn't make sense to me as to why they would sell two different qualities. Why not just get rid of the bad quality and ONLY use good quality.
But so if I signup for the "good quality". I'm paying $50 a month and only able to do 250 articles (based on 1000 words).
It's a bit discouraging being so limited like that. I wish I was just able to pay a lump sum and then copy the software over to my servers and run off of it as I please. Instead of relying on someone elses servers and being subscription based.
Over 5 years it would end up costing $3000.
True - and I'm not saying that that is small fry - but I spent $4000+ on content in December 2013 alone. It's just one of those things these days.
Scrimp on content and your chances of a site having long term success are somewhere between slim and sweet F all
Scritty
Do you use spun WordAI content on Tier 1? If so what is your source of the content to be spun Content Machine or something like that?
I ask as I wonder if paragraph combined scraped articles with WordAi spun are much better than just one article written from scratch and spun on word and sentence level. My findings imply that second option isn't good, but i do not know if the first one is better.
That depends all on your spinnig skills, the output of my spung articles are all very readable but it takes about an hour to spin a 400 word article correctly with a uniqueness of +70% although it takes a lot of my time i think it is totally worth it.
I have build a archive of about 150 spung articles in my local niche over the past 4 months, so whenever i am in need of quick content it is there, tools like spinnerchief and TBS are great for that, just spin one or two articles a day and in a view months you will have no need for content anymore.
Another Word AI thread?! Gzz man there was another one yesterday, then another one a couple days before that.
Have you tried The Best Spinner? Its what I use. I actually use Spin Wizard first then TBS and can get spintax's done in a couple minutes. You can get both TBS and Spin Wizard for $20 / year if you know where to look.
I do not ask about speed but about seo results.
I have a manually spun article of around 100 000 words( yes 100 000 words) and Google still recognizes that it is spun when I put around 1000 output articles on my site. So I do believe google is capable of recognizing even the best spun content. This was manually spun so it took a long time.
That depends all on your spinnig skills, the output of my spung articles are all very readable but it takes about an hour to spin a 400 word article correctly with a uniqueness of +70% although it takes a lot of my time i think it is totally worth it.
I have build a archive of about 150 spung articles in my local niche over the past 4 months, so whenever i am in need of quick content it is there, tools like spinnerchief and TBS are great for that, just spin one or two articles a day and in a view months you will have no need for content anymore.