1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

is this link pyramid ok now with the google algo change?

Discussion in 'Black Hat SEO' started by namewithnogaps, Mar 7, 2011.

  1. namewithnogaps

    namewithnogaps Junior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2010
    Messages:
    198
    Likes Received:
    74
    hi, what do you think about this path

    do you think the site may be penalised?

    tier1:
    sbox and xrumer blasts (blind)
    tier2:
    articles, press releases, web 2.0, high pr links
    tier3:
    money site

    no interlinking inside tiers.

    If you dont get it, i spam with both sbox and xrumer all tier 2 links. all tier 2 links point to the money site.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  2. itos84

    itos84 Power Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2011
    Messages:
    617
    Likes Received:
    229
    Location:
    neatblog.com
    Home Page:
    Yeap looks great. Focus first on the high PR links for profiles, and comments.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  3. Mokodoki

    Mokodoki Regular Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2011
    Messages:
    217
    Likes Received:
    354
    Occupation:
    Graphic Artist | Fulltime Student
    I think your diagram may be a bit upside down. Generally, tier structures refer to actual physical properties. Really, your link pyramid only has one tier which may or may not be OK for your niche competitiveness. For example:

    Money Site [not a tier, this isn't part of your linking structure]
    |
    Tier 1 [Google's Favorites]
    |
    Tier 2 [A Few Favorites, Some red-headed step children]
    |
    Tier 3 [Lots of Autoapprove stuff, my lowest quality articles, Profile links, and other random junk]

    Tier 3 and 2 gets blasted with anything and everything. Tier 1 gets some love from some good stuff, and my money site gets the sexy backlinks. There's no right or wrong way to do this and your basic idea is just fine as is, I just thought I'd point out that it normally has more levels as a "pyramid" structure!
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
    Last edited: Mar 7, 2011
  4. namewithnogaps

    namewithnogaps Junior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2010
    Messages:
    198
    Likes Received:
    74
    thanks guys, if others want please collaborate with your views on linking
     
  5. davijg

    davijg Newbie

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2009
    Messages:
    38
    Likes Received:
    7
    I reckon that's a fairly sound method. Personally I'd be tempted to have a another layer inbetween the xr and sbox blasts and the web 2.0s, articles etc.
     
  6. Gamboloyd

    Gamboloyd Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2010
    Messages:
    79
    Likes Received:
    36
    Occupation:
    Freelance Writer and confused IM
    Location:
    Somewhere in a BHW thread
    Hi folks. Would I be correct in my process of comments which link to article urls which in turn link to main site? I am just creating my structure and have web 2.0 sites too. Just wanted to clarify that a comment blast which links to article urls would pass link juice to the site linked in that article.

    Appreciated :)
     
    Last edited: Apr 27, 2011
  7. Expertpeon

    Expertpeon Elite Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2011
    Messages:
    1,959
    Likes Received:
    1,187
    Money site
    |
    Web 2.0 and Very few, very High PR articles (Eznine etc)
    |
    AMR articles and press releases and weak .edu links
    |
    Forum Profiles (spam)
    |
    Autoapprove link farms.

    Tier 3 is the ONLY RSS I make and they're scheduled.