Nauthiz666
Senior Member
- Nov 14, 2008
- 875
- 87
For example, I have a list of 500 social book mark sites. Instead of finding new sites, I submit the site to the same sites again using different accounts. Is this still useful?
IS submitting multiple times to same book mark site ok?
- Thread starter Nauthiz666
- Start date
makinsales
Regular Member
- Jul 23, 2011
- 368
- 284
Yes, as long as its not the same content.
Techxan
Elite Member
- Dec 7, 2011
- 3,091
- 3,620
Google will discount all the links from the same referring domain except the first few.
Expertpeon
Elite Member
- Apr 22, 2011
- 1,959
- 1,198
kegnum
Senior Member
- May 13, 2009
- 1,156
- 608
While you will loose a bit of link juice the more links you put through the same sites, they will still be helpful.
Blogroll anyone...
You need to spin titles and description, but what you've described here is actual successful bookmarking. You do want multiple accounts so you can submit your actual URLs multiple times to vote them up and increase your traffic temporarily. If you don't use RSS camo or something similar, you will get your accounts banned. But yes, it's kind of pointless to NOT do what you're talking about doing.
veheme
Elite Member
- Jan 18, 2012
- 2,877
- 1,040
I don't know about discounting but devaluing would be more appropriate.
There are 2 scenarios though:
1. Submissions to the same sites multiple times will result in discounted links IF the content of each submission is precisely the same as before.
2. Submissions to the same sites multiple times will result in devalued (less value than the first 2 submissions) IF the content of each submission is unique.
bobbylove321
BANNED
- Nov 8, 2008
- 1,986
- 2,221
Google will only count 1 ip, so even if you do it a thousand times, it is still only a max of 500 unique ip links.
It is a waste of time to do it over and over.
markhenry121
Elite Member
- Oct 14, 2011
- 2,147
- 242
Yes, you can do it by using different account but title and description should not be the same and it can get easily indexed.
