Is Sape even worth it?

emerica1184

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2011
Messages
347
Reaction score
88
I don't know if i'm missing something, but it seems like Sape is just an excuse for sellers to charge an exorbitant monthly fee.

With Sape what you are getting is a link with following metrics (depending on your filters):

High PR
High DA
High PA
High TF
High CF
Low OBL

So why would i spend $175 a month for 5 "high metrics" links? Is there something more special that i'm not seeing? I'd rather pay a one time $175 for 15 high metric web2.0s and have those sites under my control. Or even build a PBN and host, that would still run me less than $175 a month. So again, why bother?

Edit: I guess I should also add that i'm referring to bhw services, my cc didn't work at sape...
 
Last edited:
I think sape is pure black hat link which can harm your site.
 
Well it depends on the project. I think it's superb for short term results or churn and burn websites. I think it should not be used on a website you want to use for the long term.
 
I had someone offering me SAPE backlinks which were not .ru at a cheap price monthly.
The seller was sure that they would not harm moneysites, but I'd say for churn and burn they are good value. Had people piled into these a couple of years back, they would have got the best ROI, but the day will come when the Big G starts to look deeply into thiese networks.
 
If you're using a buffer such as a PBN, does it matter if the links are relative or am I just looking for a powerful SAPE link since i'm running it through a buffer?
 
I don't know if i'm missing something, but it seems like Sape is just an excuse for sellers to charge an exorbitant monthly fee.

With Sape what you are getting is a link with following metrics (depending on your filters):

High PR
High DA
High PA
High TF
High CF
Low OBL

So why would i spend $175 a month for 5 "high metrics" links? Is there something more special that i'm not seeing? I'd rather pay a one time $175 for 15 high metric web2.0s and have those sites under my control. Or even build a PBN and host, that would still run me less than $175 a month. So again, why bother?

Edit: I guess I should also add that i'm referring to bhw services, my cc didn't work at sape...

Contact Sape support and they can ad your CC manually.
 
If you're using a buffer such as a PBN, does it matter if the links are relative or am I just looking for a powerful SAPE link since i'm running it through a buffer?

It doesn't have to but why would you put the PBN as a buffer? Why not web2.0 instead?
 
It doesn't have to but why would you put the PBN as a buffer? Why not web2.0 instead?
I was told either-or would be fine to add SAPE links to.

Is there an advantage web 2.0 over PBN? Or because it already has all the authority already, that's the advantage?
 
SAPE is the software ? can you people explain me about that
 
SAPE is the software ? can you people explain me about that
Yes it is like RankerX and Senuke!

Sape is working great if you get the right links. There is, like with anything else, lots of trash out here and if you don't know what you are doing when you try find them your self, you will risk your site!
 
i used sape but nothing worked... google does not like links from footer, widgets. you should get real link in the article
 
automatic create backlinks software ? brother
Yes it is like RankerX and Senuke!

Sape is working great if you get the right links. There is, like with anything else, lots of trash out here and if you don't know what you are doing when you try find them your self, you will risk your site!
 
It was a joke. If you read and search the forum you don't need to ask what SAPE is.
 
See what I suggest,first check the market,what price is now for these type of links,and then buy.Also do research about those links,how those links will get benefits?
 
I was told either-or would be fine to add SAPE links to.

Is there an advantage web 2.0 over PBN? Or because it already has all the authority already, that's the advantage?

Pbn is more powerful than web2.0 so there's no need for you to add more links to it, instead use web2.0 as a buffer.
 
Back
Top