Is rewriting(spin) article good to use for website?
- Thread starter havkiek
- Start date
I will personally advise you not to consider that option. I have been creating content for the websites for a very long time. I have therefore tried different ways of doing this with spinning in place too. However, you need to know that the articles produced by a spinner are the worst ever. They always lack a flow and hence the retention rate from the guests will be very low. You can always get the best and affordable content through the many available agencies today. You can as well get in touch with me for a good offer.
Avada Kedavra
Newbie
- Oct 19, 2016
- 17
- 2
Based on my personal experience, this is a huge mistake people do and mostly because of 2 things:
1. Spinned (even 100% unique) articles, read like crap and don't provide any value to your readers.
2. Search engines are getting smarter every hour and they already are able to detect spinned content (to avoid this it's good to add/subtract couple of paragraphs from the original text and then make the spin)
The ONLY time when I would recommend spinning articles is if you are using a PBN. You can use spinned articles as 2 or 3 tier links, pointing back to your PBN sites or any other Web2.0 properties, but NEVER on your site, or even as a 1st tier link.
Avada Kedavra
1. Spinned (even 100% unique) articles, read like crap and don't provide any value to your readers.
2. Search engines are getting smarter every hour and they already are able to detect spinned content (to avoid this it's good to add/subtract couple of paragraphs from the original text and then make the spin)
The ONLY time when I would recommend spinning articles is if you are using a PBN. You can use spinned articles as 2 or 3 tier links, pointing back to your PBN sites or any other Web2.0 properties, but NEVER on your site, or even as a 1st tier link.
Avada Kedavra
blogzandstuff
Elite Member
- Jan 1, 2015
- 10,760
- 6,913
Spinning is ok but quality is poor. Better to rewrite manually or write from scratch. I use spinrewriter but still have to edit.
It depends on things like if your budget is not up to hiring writers, time to write.
I have been doing this for a long time and I use a spinner
It depends on things like if your budget is not up to hiring writers, time to write.
I have been doing this for a long time and I use a spinner
Burn Notice
Power Member
- Jan 8, 2009
- 676
- 226
The short answer is Yes!
The long answer is what many don't realize is much of the content that's being praised all over the internet as the standard for blog posts or articles is "spun"/rewritten content.
To be clear the rewrites I'm referring to are thorough and done very well but they are indeed rewrites.
Content rewritten at the sentence level by a human is not "spun" content. Here's an example:
Original: As soon as he got out of bed, Joe jumped in his truck and went down to the store for some cigarettes.
Rewrite: First thing in the morning Joe took his car down to the supermarket for a pack of smokes.
Both say the exact same thing.
The point is when done right a rewritten piece of content is not almost like a new piece of content, it IS a new piece of content.
Avada Kedavra
Newbie
- Oct 19, 2016
- 17
- 2
There is a huge difference between "rewriting" a text, and "spinning" a text. A software will never do this as effectively as a human can.
I believe that OP referred more to "spinning" even if the article is 100% unique. Even so, it's still a bad idea imo.
Rewriting on the other hand, can be useful, although I would never do it on my personal website. After all, it is clear that it is a rewrite and
might damage your brand (when people find out that you are rewriting it). If on the other hand, you are using a fake identity and don't care
about reputation, then rewriting might be a time-saver for you.
But anyway, the best way IMHO is simply to write unique, engaging, and interesting content that your audience will love. Sooner or later you will
establish a "mini-brand" and people will appreciate it
As for the backlinks, do whatever you please
Avada Kedavra
I believe that OP referred more to "spinning" even if the article is 100% unique. Even so, it's still a bad idea imo.
Rewriting on the other hand, can be useful, although I would never do it on my personal website. After all, it is clear that it is a rewrite and
might damage your brand (when people find out that you are rewriting it). If on the other hand, you are using a fake identity and don't care
about reputation, then rewriting might be a time-saver for you.
But anyway, the best way IMHO is simply to write unique, engaging, and interesting content that your audience will love. Sooner or later you will
establish a "mini-brand" and people will appreciate it
As for the backlinks, do whatever you please
Avada Kedavra
blogzandstuff
Elite Member
- Jan 1, 2015
- 10,760
- 6,913
A rewrite will not damage if done properly, take the text and add to it, change etc. Nobody will ever knowThere is a huge difference between "rewriting" a text, and "spinning" a text. A software will never do this as effectively as a human can.
I believe that OP referred more to "spinning" even if the article is 100% unique. Even so, it's still a bad idea imo.
Rewriting on the other hand, can be useful, although I would never do it on my personal website. After all, it is clear that it is a rewrite and
might damage your brand (when people find out that you are rewriting it). If on the other hand, you are using a fake identity and don't care
about reputation, then rewriting might be a time-saver for you.
But anyway, the best way IMHO is simply to write unique, engaging, and interesting content that your audience will love. Sooner or later you will
establish a "mini-brand" and people will appreciate it
As for the backlinks, do whatever you please
Avada Kedavra
Avada Kedavra
Newbie
- Oct 19, 2016
- 17
- 2
Well probably it won't, but there is always the risk that people notice it.
I'm saying it because I've had such an issue myself in the past, when I was rewriting articles and posting them as guest posts on
authority websites which get a huge amount of daily readers, and on one of them, I got in the comments some pretty much embarrassing
feedback, and the worse part was that I was using my own identity.
In reality, the article was 100% unique, and some things were even changed, but when one comment revealed the original article, it signaled to my readers
that I am stealing ideas, and that I am not original in my writing (which wasn't true for my blog, I had only done it for some guestposting)
I definitely agree that this scenario is very unlikely, but there is always a slight risk. In my case, it happened that one reader had read
that very similar article on another authority website.. Probably less than 1% chance ? But it happened..
So that's why I said, if you are building a personal brand online, be original, be unique. If you are just running small niche websites with fake identities and imaginary website owners with stock images, then you have nothing to lose..
Avada Kedavra
I'm saying it because I've had such an issue myself in the past, when I was rewriting articles and posting them as guest posts on
authority websites which get a huge amount of daily readers, and on one of them, I got in the comments some pretty much embarrassing
feedback, and the worse part was that I was using my own identity.
In reality, the article was 100% unique, and some things were even changed, but when one comment revealed the original article, it signaled to my readers
that I am stealing ideas, and that I am not original in my writing (which wasn't true for my blog, I had only done it for some guestposting)
I definitely agree that this scenario is very unlikely, but there is always a slight risk. In my case, it happened that one reader had read
that very similar article on another authority website.. Probably less than 1% chance ?
But it happened..So that's why I said, if you are building a personal brand online, be original, be unique. If you are just running small niche websites with fake identities and imaginary website owners with stock images, then you have nothing to lose..
Avada Kedavra
- Dec 9, 2013
- 4,650
- 1,591
Not Good for Money Site. But every body using this type of content for Link Building.
blogzandstuff
Elite Member
- Jan 1, 2015
- 10,760
- 6,913
I can see what you are saying, but with all due respect I didn't mention using fake identities. Of course writing for high authority sites is going to get you caught, but a average blogger who rewrites an article is different, really the same as going to a library and using text from a book and putting that information into own words, is that wrong?Well probably it won't, but there is always the risk that people notice it.
I'm saying it because I've had such an issue myself in the past, when I was rewriting articles and posting them as guest posts on
authority websites which get a huge amount of daily readers, and on one of them, I got in the comments some pretty much embarrassing
feedback, and the worse part was that I was using my own identity.
In reality, the article was 100% unique, and some things were even changed, but when one comment revealed the original article, it signaled to my readers
that I am stealing ideas, and that I am not original in my writing (which wasn't true for my blog, I had only done it for some guestposting)
I definitely agree that this scenario is very unlikely, but there is always a slight risk. In my case, it happened that one reader had read
that very similar article on another authority website.. Probably less than 1% chance ?
So that's why I said, if you are building a personal brand online, be original, be unique. If you are just running small niche websites with fake identities and imaginary website owners with stock images, then you have nothing to lose..
Avada Kedavra
The marketplace here on BHW has a ton of authors you can test.
I sometimes will spin an article, then manually go in and change it to what I need it to read like for a web 2.0.
It's cheaper / better to get a cheap writer for your web 2.0s.
Moneysite content you need to invest the money though.
I have just rejected an article from Upwork as the idiot had clearly spun it and done it all last minute/
Instead of 'optical view finder' I get this in the article and he wonders why I reject it 'optical view discoverer'
It's cheaper / better to get a cheap writer for your web 2.0s.
Moneysite content you need to invest the money though.
I have just rejected an article from Upwork as the idiot had clearly spun it and done it all last minute/
Instead of 'optical view finder' I get this in the article and he wonders why I reject it 'optical view discoverer'
KHer0
Elite Member
- Mar 22, 2011
- 2,465
- 2,975
Spun content is working okay. Rewritten content is working more than okay. This is the third time repeating this in the same day!
Readability of the content is for your readers. On-page SEO is for Google. Google can't understand content meaning. Even there is no such thing as duplicate content penalty. Google never panelizes content for duplication. If it's 100% duplicate they try to know figure out the original source of the content and rank it while discard the others. Do you know how they do that? BY PAGE and DOMAIN AUTHORITY
Not Moz metrics of course, but there metrics. People have been and will be stealing other people rankings by copying their websites.
Funny webmaster case I have read on google, where the owner complained someone is serving his site using a script and he got omitted from the search results while the other one is ranking. Do you know how much time did it take google to resolve this problem? 8 MONTHS.
Two month later he complains it happened again. Do you want to know the creation date of this thread ? May - 2015 !! After all the animals update. SO, PLEASE ! STOP GIVING YOUR OPINIONS ON SOMETHING YOU HAVEN'T TRIED YOURSELF
If something works for you, it doesn't mean it's the only thing working ! So, Readability for visitors, SEO metrics for Google. Find what is suitable for you and try it.
Readability of the content is for your readers. On-page SEO is for Google. Google can't understand content meaning. Even there is no such thing as duplicate content penalty. Google never panelizes content for duplication. If it's 100% duplicate they try to know figure out the original source of the content and rank it while discard the others. Do you know how they do that? BY PAGE and DOMAIN AUTHORITY
Not Moz metrics of course, but there metrics. People have been and will be stealing other people rankings by copying their websites.
Funny webmaster case I have read on google, where the owner complained someone is serving his site using a script and he got omitted from the search results while the other one is ranking. Do you know how much time did it take google to resolve this problem? 8 MONTHS.
Two month later he complains it happened again. Do you want to know the creation date of this thread ? May - 2015 !! After all the animals update. SO, PLEASE ! STOP GIVING YOUR OPINIONS ON SOMETHING YOU HAVEN'T TRIED YOURSELF
If something works for you, it doesn't mean it's the only thing working ! So, Readability for visitors, SEO metrics for Google. Find what is suitable for you and try it.
roki4ka
Senior Member
- Jun 20, 2016
- 946
- 742
Spin them or auto generate them BUT always review them and correct them before publishing.
Make sure it's good written, readable, without mistakes.
You will have to do at least this.
articlewritingwork
BANNED
- Apr 19, 2016
- 557
- 64
You can put up but in the long run, it will not be beneficial
ghosteye
Regular Member
- Dec 15, 2010
- 212
- 77
Semworld advice is the best, by far. I would go with it. Only that, if you dont have the skills or the funds to take a writer or two, you may want to spin them and then correct them manually, or pay someone to do proofreading for you. That could work for a little bit of time.