sure, yeah I use both myself , Just wondered if you also saw any (even slight) improvement in Google rankings by using links built with MR. I know its not exactly a super powerful link building method , but if it moves the needle a bit, then its somthing. But obviously mainly for posts that have already got some traction in Google
I do see improvement but only when things are indexed, if they are not indexed I dont think I see much change.
I use the networks in mr for heavy and easy multi layer link set up since it also allows me to reuse accounts easy
and fits a diagram easy in whatever custom way I see fit. I dont use the default diagrams often, they are YEARS old
google has already provent it can go back multiple tiers when searching spam these days. I often use structed but longer
tier diagram to funnel authority down and often have the power funnelled in 2 or more different directions that in themself do not link between
each other (however the web 2.0s often using the same accounts have other posts from previous usage that can make the linking pattern
seem more random. parts that you get to index a few times usually start being crawled on their own a bit more often which
eases up on the indexing issues.
The distance away from the "power" is a factor that weakens how I use my networks in the begining but
it is better on ranking parasites than using set ups more easy to flag down spam brain.
(the amount of "blogs" mr lets you generate def helps make patterns a little less obvious over time)
I do other things like having them link out to tons of other authority sources in the niche (giant websites, I avoid pointing links to websites that
could get negatively affected easy because I never feel right about messing up other small businesses)
so the systems are never ONLY pointing at me or my parasites that im actually trying to rank.
(you can add multiple images, videos and urls in spintax for it to give them randomly added links that arent just your money site)
When you sculpt it into something harder to distinguish from a real living breathing network of sites in one niche (I mean, you can run
thousands at a time so it isnt as hard as trying to do this using a few hundrent web 2.0) it makes ranking things easy but you still have
risk if you point them at your site alone.
Google also cant just penalize your whole niche if just about everyone important in the niche is getting links from the whole system.
Everyone might be getting the links, but you can direct where more power is sent in the end.
You can make custom diagrams that allow you to run multiple diagrams at the same time in one go.
It can be used to point at a site you own or even rank things like a blogger site
Can you guess what week links might have been indexed towards this? im pretty sure you can, if that answers your question as to if they
even touch the needle at all. Keep in mind, id never really have a real reason to build legitimate white hat links to other web 2.0 so this isnt ranking
based on anything other than spam.
Unidentified spam + time
is the same as
Backlinks + time
(except the backlinks are a time bomb waiting on google to figure it out) which is gonna be hard to even assign damage since they link
to everyone, not just some singular random blog that wants to rank local business.
using this can even get google to switch which reddit page is being used on the serp (well, this might be less useful for that part since google
has been playing around with having a specific spot in the serps just to show forum posts).
Note- Do not copy my diagram, that was just an old one im using as an example and I dont say this specifically is what works.
- sending a ton of links to a reddit page alone without trying to make the links seem more natural might not work.
-all my modern runs use thousands of links that funnel power down to a few hundred links, I cant vouch for
sending thousands of raw links with no tiers.
-Dont ask me for diagrams, make your own
- test things yourself, many people will say things do or do not work even though they know nothing.
