Is quillbot good for pbn posts?

metalfingersdoom

Junior Member
Joined
Feb 1, 2022
Messages
169
Reaction score
41
Hey guys, I'm under a tight schedule and should pump out articles as fast as I can for a couple PBN's that I control. I have read someplace around this forum that taking different parts of essays from multiple websites, merging them then running them through quillbot was an acceptable way to pump out content. Would I pass google's quality tests if I did so or would google see right through my shit? what are your opinions?

inb4: I don't care about manual inspection, I don't plan on getting one lol
 
I would suggest, you should check the content after quilling it and make some modifications.

Because I have seen quilbot sometimes just changes the context of the sentence. So you must look into it.
 
Your idea is good, simple as that. Even if some sentences does not make sense - it's fine if it's just for PBN.
 
For tier 2 or short term money site. Not for tier 1 or long-term project.
 
For tier 2 or short term money site. Not for tier 1 or long-term project.
why not for tier1's? manual inspection or just overall low quality? Would it be tier1 material if I edited everything to make it more readable and on topic after quilling?

Should I try to make things even more unique or should quillling + what I mentioned above be enough?
 
why not for tier1's? manual inspection or just overall low quality? Would it be tier1 material if I edited everything to make it more readable and on topic after quilling?
The problem with PBN is they have a huge responsability because they are not good enough to be a classic site, but they can't be so bad, to be spotted by a manual review and uncover the whole network. This is specially important, because most of the time, there are some correlations between a PBN that can uncover a massive amount of other sites in the PBN (this is why there is an N in PBN for "network").

Therefore, generally when we create a PBN we are very picky with the content and try to be hyper-aware of leaving the least footprints.

Think on PBN like a drug cartel. The better the "front aspect" of the place where you sell the drug, the least the options of the cops of uncovering your whole mafia :p

For those that create PBN that are pure clean blogs, I've repeated 100% times: that are not PBN, that are regular sites selling guest posts under the name of PBN that sounds cooler. But a real PBN is something very fishy in the back door that looks outstanding in the front-door
 
Hey guys, I'm under a tight schedule and should pump out articles as fast as I can for a couple PBN's that I control. I have read someplace around this forum that taking different parts of essays from multiple websites, merging them then running them through quillbot was an acceptable way to pump out content. Would I pass google's quality tests if I did so or would google see right through my shit? what are your opinions?

inb4: I don't care about manual inspection, I don't plan on getting one lol
Spun content works.
Anyone who says the contrary, really hasn't tried it.
 
why not for tier1's? manual inspection or just overall low quality? Would it be tier1 material if I edited everything to make it more readable and on topic after quilling?

Should I try to make things even more unique or should quillling + what I mentioned above be enough?
Yes quality & readability is the issue.

I haven't tried the method your described. Even spinning and poor rewriting works to a certain extent.

But I wouldn't do it and just prefer manual writing.
 
Spun content works.
With a PBN anything works. In fact, historically they were created with the weirdest content every possibly imagined. The problem as I've said is not the fact that if they work or not (in terms of reputation transmission) but the risk of throwing the whole scheme is extreme.
This is why you see hundreds of thousands of japanese expired domains that noones want: They were this kind of shitty spun PBN massively penalized and rendered useless.
 
PBN massively penalized
Yeah but I've found that even penalized sites get depenalized a few years later and they kick google serps' ass lol.

Obv, higher chance of getting a new penalty but yeah they can still work
 
With a PBN anything works. In fact, historically they were created with the weirdest content every possibly imagined. The problem as I've said is not the fact that if they work or not (in terms of reputation transmission) but the risk of throwing the whole scheme is extreme.
This is why you see hundreds of thousands of japanese expired domains that noones want: They were this kind of shitty spun PBN massively penalized and rendered useless.
I don't have a massive underlying scheme so I'll just ve going with the spun content then
 
ye
Hey guys, I'm under a tight schedule and should pump out articles as fast as I can for a couple PBN's that I control. I have read someplace around this forum that taking different parts of essays from multiple websites, merging them then running them through quillbot was an acceptable way to pump out content. Would I pass google's quality tests if I did so or would google see right through my shit? what are your opinions?

inb4: I don't care about manual inspection, I don't plan on getting one lol
yes it is .
it helped me alot
 
I've done rigorous testing, and discovered that if you run any article, through the "Smodin" text rewriting website, and then take the resulting article and run it through "Quillbot", the final article, is 100% unique and fully readable as if someone else wrote it in their own words. not a single error, and the words and sentences actually make sense, and they stay on topic, for the most part.
 
If the content is readable, contextual, and has no errors, then it's fine to publish them. You should only check if the quillbot changes context, content makes no sense, or the content has grammatical errors. If it's fine for you, then it should be fine for robots visiting your sites.
 
Back
Top