blackbeans
Elite Member
- Nov 29, 2008
- 9,247
- 4,806
Near came up with their version of the algorithmic stablecoin UST
We all know how LUNA's algo stablecoin project fared
Is NEAR's project going to get WRECKED just like the LUNA UST fiasco?
Or does it have enough DESIGN DIFFERENCES from its 'model' for it to SURVIVE and possibly even THRIVE? For example, it is also linked to USDT not just USN
The big problem with LUNA's implementation of the algo stablecoin concept is that it is TOO DECENTRALIZED - there are no firebrakes (if you will) on the LUNA minting side of the equation.
We all know how LUNA's algo stablecoin project fared
Is NEAR's project going to get WRECKED just like the LUNA UST fiasco?
Or does it have enough DESIGN DIFFERENCES from its 'model' for it to SURVIVE and possibly even THRIVE? For example, it is also linked to USDT not just USN
The big problem with LUNA's implementation of the algo stablecoin concept is that it is TOO DECENTRALIZED - there are no firebrakes (if you will) on the LUNA minting side of the equation.