is linklicious.me ACTUALLY WORKING?

Sugirl

Power Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2010
Messages
621
Reaction score
556
Seems like the free version doesn't gives any effect to anyone, but what about the paid version- has anyone been able to get your links actually indexed using their service?
 
i have just subscribed for the basic package.
it shown that my site was crawled..but didnt guaranteed indexed (the owner claim that too)...
will report back the result after sometime.
 
It does what it says
Links are crawled like promised but there is no improviment in indexing rate of backlinks.
So is it useful? In my opinion links count only if indexed so.....
 
I stopped using it and went back to rolling my own RSS feeds in ScrapeBox.
 
I can't attribute this to Linklicious because there is no way of telling...but whenever I do link blasts (only about 100 links or so, and I do it sporadically because I'm lazy) I always submit them using the free version and I usually notice an increase in my SERPS the next morning. So I have to assume Linklicious is helping out in there somewhere.
 
not for me. i got 50K account but i found it as usless.
if someone want to check if it's working before buying or to try his luck on his links, i have another 20 days there so you are welcome to use it. just pm me.
 
We've gotten a lot of success stories from using the site including a handful of people that call in a panic wanting feeds deleted because the Google dance hits them hard. I've owned a web development/SEO shop since 2003 and we've been using this and some other tools internally for a while.

And to still believe a link has to be indexed to count is silly. I have a half dozen clients right now that are on page one with ZERO backlinks indexed. Do yourself a favor and test this stuff instead of believing what I or anyone else spouts.
 
I also have the $54 pro account and cant really see any benefit. It seams like a good idea in principle but it has some major bugs. The wp plugin is a nightmare. It genertates errors all the time, for no apparant reason. One moment its posting quite happily the next its encountered some undefined error and stops. And whats worse is when it encounters an error it automatically changes its status to "stopped" so it no longer submits your feed. And you have to manually go in to the wp plugin settings and restart it again. No big deal if you ahve a few sites but we have about 1000 autoblogs and its a nightmare.

In summary I really hope they get this application sorted as it could be great. but its just not delivering at the moment.
 
And to still believe a link has to be indexed to count is silly.

then why do you run your links through linklicious if getting indexed doesnt matter? afterall, thats what the service is for :rolleyes:

linklicious sucks.
 
the free package is obviously a gig get you to buy the full version. comon, we're all marketers here, you should have guessed that.
 
then why do you run your links through linklicious if getting indexed doesnt matter? afterall, thats what the service is for :rolleyes:

linklicious sucks.

To get the links noticed. :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
The site says I have links but I cant verify that independently.So I have no idea how well it is working.I have used lots of backlink trackers but it show no links or 1 or 2.If any one has a link checker that is showing differently pm me so I can take a look at it.

Dizz
 
Links are crawled like promised but there is no improviment in indexing rate of backlinks.
So is it useful? In my opinion links count only if indexed so.....

x2. Linklicious is useless. If you want your links indexed, you need to build links to them with scripts like Backlinks Energizer or Backlinks Index Express
 
And to still believe a link has to be indexed to count is silly. I have a half dozen clients right now that are on page one with ZERO backlinks indexed. Do yourself a favor and test this stuff instead of believing what I or anyone else spouts.

I think you have something to this. My site is already on page 2 for a medium competition keyword that has 1,600 exact searches a month and my site only has 1 page and 11 indexed backlinks. I submitted all my backlinks to linklicious with my "basic" package and it seems to be working quite well. I think linklicious has some value at least, and its not even expensive.
 
x2. Linklicious is useless. If you want your links indexed, you need to build links to them with scripts like Backlinks Energizer or Backlinks Index Express

Though it will help some, getting indexed is slow and expensive and not a primary goal of the site.. So I can't disagree. :)
 
I really like the idea of linklicious and I am a paid member, but unfortunately my backlink numbers are actually going DOWN instead of up (I have been solely trying to use linklicious as my only source for indexing links). It would be great if the links that are fed into it actually get indexed, but for some reason they seem to be completely ignored instead... not sure why. Crawling is 100%, but indexing well, that is another story :confused:
 
To actually benefit people, let's dissect things a bit together.

Here are my assumptions so let me know where you disagree.
- Links have value in the following order: cached, indexed, crawled, not crawled
- Uncrawled links offer no benefit because Google doesn't know about them
- Sites can rank with zero links indexed and zero links cached
- Profile links are very rarely found because they are so weakly linked. You may be a home page mention until other spammers push you off, so if you aren't there when G crawls your page will almost never be found.
- Linklicious knows when your links are crawled and pings until you get 100% crawl coverage.
 
Lolololol, thousands "crawled" but not indexed and no serp movement in easy ass niche. Totally love just getting "noticed" :rolleyes:

then why do you run your links through linklicious if getting indexed doesnt matter?

lol, I was just answering your question mate! ;) (main point being, running links through linklicious isn't primarily for indexation purposes...)

Anyway, 'easy ass niche' and only hundreds crawled has worked in the past for me...
 
Doesn't seem to work for me. The rss feeds are indicates to have been crawled but I do not see any improvement. I've gone back to making RSS feeds on icerocket and submitting them to feed aggregators
 
Back
Top