I never use breadcrumbs. Sure, it helps the navigation and everything, but it can easily be perceived as keyword stuffing. It screws the keyword density big time and even can manage to get some weaker pages cannibalized. I guess from what I am reading in the above replies, it's highly subjective. Try it and you will see.
and if someone has said that it reduces the keyword density then he is a noob.
keyword density means the number of times keyword appears in the content or page and breadcrumbs are somewhat different
Breadcrumbs are part of page. Not sure how that makes breadcrumbs different? You should be looking at KW density of page as whole - Including sidebar/footer/nav bar/breadcrumbs/content.
In terms of user friendliness, I think they can work well.
The coding isn't but the words 'top' 'Anime' and 'Kono' should be. Basically all the text output.
I did A/B Testing with couple of my sites on same niche.
One was with Breadcrumbs and another was without breadcrumbs (I used Wordpress Plugin for that).
And the results with B Testing was awesome!
For someone that isn't great with code, care to enlighten me on what point you're making here? 'Ao No Exorcist' words are still text output, and part of page. For example, these links should still show on google cache text version. They aren't hidden from google, meaning the spider can read them as part of the page. = KW density.I know very well it is not counted in that KD
Now check
For someone that isn't great with code, care to enlighten me on what point you're making here? 'Ao No Exorcist' words are still text output, and part of page. For example, these links should still show on google cache text version. They aren't hidden from google, meaning the spider can read them as part of the page. = KW density.
Can you explain what I'm missing?