Is Article Forge good for Rewrite or Pillar Content?
- Thread starter myfault
- Start date
Forget money site with any of these tools.
Now, it has been quite some time since I did a trial but I found it just crappy, same as with their ai writer (forgot the name)
With GPT3 I highly doubt their "AI" is any better, it certainly was not when I tried to spin an article and it took minutes and it was pure BS.
Again just MY opinion from back then. I have no reason to go back and try , and rather work with GPT3 , own GPT@ model than I'd pay monthly for any of these "ai" writers...
Now, it has been quite some time since I did a trial but I found it just crappy, same as with their ai writer (forgot the name)
With GPT3 I highly doubt their "AI" is any better, it certainly was not when I tried to spin an article and it took minutes and it was pure BS.
Again just MY opinion from back then. I have no reason to go back and try , and rather work with GPT3 , own GPT@ model than I'd pay monthly for any of these "ai" writers...
myfault
Senior Member
- Sep 21, 2012
- 970
- 242
But we can use some part of the contents from that article and correct the grammar if required, and what is the filler content means?
- May 2, 2010
- 9,947
- 16,057
Sometimes its good, sometimes its bad. However, its more often pretty good.
I've used article forge content as money site articles now problem. One article I created is now in the top 3 most visited articles on one of my websites.
But that doesn't happen every time, unfortunately.
I've used article forge content as money site articles now problem. One article I created is now in the top 3 most visited articles on one of my websites.
But that doesn't happen every time, unfortunately.
- Nov 11, 2018
- 12,080
- 10,858
Nether rewrite nor pillar content.
Neither rewrite because its not a rewiter , use wordAI for and qualibot pro for rewrite.
Nor pillar content because its spits out 750 words max per article. You need about 3500 words article to call it a pillar content.
Neither rewrite because its not a rewiter , use wordAI for and qualibot pro for rewrite.
Nor pillar content because its spits out 750 words max per article. You need about 3500 words article to call it a pillar content.
myfault
Senior Member
- Sep 21, 2012
- 970
- 242
I am using quillbot pro, 750 words + my own 3000 words.
- Nov 11, 2018
- 12,080
- 10,858
If you are willing to write 3000 words you wanna re-evaluate your content creation tech stack to something like this:
https://www.blackhatworld.com/seo/h...re-your-favorite-tools-and-processes.1300054/
- Feb 16, 2018
- 1,187
- 906
For filler content I mean like for Web 2.0s, YouTube videos, if I need to expand a shorter blog post by adding some generic information, etc.
Giorgio Lauria
Regular Member
- Jun 5, 2020
- 273
- 86
Every sort of spinner, article generator, and that sort of stuff, including gpt-2 will never produce content of good quality. If you think that using this stuff you're saving money, you're totally wrong. On your money site having good product reviews will convert a lot more than spun, generated content. Instead, for something like web 2.0, you can do whatever you want if you don't plan to get a lot of traffic to your money site (a manual review is unlikely). The important thing to remember is to make those articles at least 50% unique.
- Mar 30, 2018
- 12,094
- 14,363
It’s best if you’re creating a pbn network and want filler content to keep it going, but for a Main site no it’s a bad idea
Black Adam
Jr Vip
- Jul 15, 2019
- 470
- 169
I used before article forge for article generate. It's not generate articles to focus keyword. It's bad. and also that not good to money site. It can use for tier 2 link building.
Ralph Connor
Newbie
- Sep 13, 2019
- 1
- 0
Not "as is"... on money page...
solidguy_82
Banned - Multiple Rules Violations
- Jul 14, 2016
- 2,899
- 1,131
You need to post content on money site only which makes sense to read. High quality top notch content.
For web 2.0 definitely you can use spinned /filler content.
For web 2.0 definitely you can use spinned /filler content.
crazyStrap
Junior Member
- Apr 21, 2021
- 115
- 34
Actually thinking of subscribing. It uses GPT-2 and can be detected for. It is a great fluff filler. If you complement it with Jarvis Introduction, Jarvis Closing paragraph and Jarvis Explain to Child and Improve Content, you actually get pretty decent Tier-1 content.
Otherwise it is Tier 2+ and Web 2.0 filler. Not bad actually.
SEO wise, it is pretty optimized. It integrate swith WordAI, that is amazing by itself.
Otherwise it is Tier 2+ and Web 2.0 filler. Not bad actually.
SEO wise, it is pretty optimized. It integrate swith WordAI, that is amazing by itself.