Is 301 redirect still pass juice ?
- Thread starter Dr_And
- Start date
IG Professor
BANNED
- Feb 22, 2017
- 4,855
- 4,567
Yes it is
Dr_And
Power Member
- May 28, 2011
- 772
- 106
So how can i do it the right way ?
Elegante
Regular Member
- Jul 6, 2015
- 429
- 153
It would be hard to do it the wrong way.... what do you need help with?
RealGuestPost
BANNED
- Apr 23, 2019
- 20
- 0
I works but you have to send the backlinks to the domains to indexer like speed links or index inject
Dr_And
Power Member
- May 28, 2011
- 772
- 106
Some theories telling only redirect one page with maximum juice
Dr_And
Power Member
- May 28, 2011
- 772
- 106
You mean build the site again
- Jan 17, 2015
- 5,263
- 4,955
Best mechanisms are based on content related redirections. This is difficult to spot sometimes, but if you redirect, lets say a dog breeding article to a financial service article, the probability of profiting from that 301 is very low.
Most people recommend disguising content for the 301. Example. If there original article is a dog breeding article, you can write in the financial site a topic regarding dog assurances and how it may benefit your financials (or something like that). Then the 301 will be much more effective. On a 301, Google expects a reasonable redirect, and I'm 99% sure that Google link juicing have some implicit properties on the formula, like cohesion of the category.
Most people recommend disguising content for the 301. Example. If there original article is a dog breeding article, you can write in the financial site a topic regarding dog assurances and how it may benefit your financials (or something like that). Then the 301 will be much more effective. On a 301, Google expects a reasonable redirect, and I'm 99% sure that Google link juicing have some implicit properties on the formula, like cohesion of the category.
aldis
Elite Member
- Apr 10, 2009
- 1,590
- 589
Well, in most cases, no. Redirects are not bad for your site, only if you put them in place correctly. Lousy implementation of 301 redirects can cause trouble for your website.
If the redirect goes to a website that is not precisely good enough for those rankings you previous website had, that's something Google will keep in mind and kill your rankings.
fasttrak
Elite Member
- Sep 12, 2016
- 3,514
- 3,986
I find that quite hit and miss. I have non related 301's giving a very nice boost and others not. I see competitors with excellent results from non related 301's as well. I sometimes think it is down to the quality of the domain you are redirecting. If it is viewed as clean by G.
- Jan 17, 2015
- 5,263
- 4,955
I never go with a 301 ATM except for strange situations, but these were the recommended guidelines by Google. If we cannot trust those guidelines, then shut down all the on page strategies.
fasttrak
Elite Member
- Sep 12, 2016
- 3,514
- 3,986
LOL - Google also tell us not to build links...
As I said, non related 301's are a bit hit and miss for me, but definitely DO work for clean domains.
- Jan 17, 2015
- 5,263
- 4,955
LOL - Google also tell us not to build links...
It's not the same. Here Google advice on how to make those links considering the fact that they should be made for a major purpose (i.e. web migration).
I'm not saying that 301 just don't plainly work. I think that 301 good domains are simply a bad exchange. But if you are doing this massively and you don't have the resources to make it better, then it might be just ok.
D
Deleted member 994306
Guest
Yes it does..but make sure the new site is relevant to the old site ..because redirecting to completely different niche wont do you any good..