Interesting finding. Ranking using spammy 2.0 blogs.

You need to educate yourself my dude, a backlink without traffic doesn't work anymore.
He run one of the most successful network and Ranked 1000s of keywords.

Traffic mean nothing for Seo, Active sites do - Sites with Content updated frequently
 
He run one of the most successful network and Ranked 1000s of keywords.

Traffic mean nothing for Seo, Active sites do - Sites with Content updated frequently

Do you know me and what i run? Information is out there dude, but i doubt you can even read it when you have punctuation and grammatical errors mid-sentence.
 
Do you know me and what i run? Information is out there dude, but i doubt you can even read it when you have punctuation and grammatical errors mid-sentence.
You dont run anything, atleast not on this forum. Give source of your Information or you dont know anything
 
source.gif
 
You dont run anything, atleast not on this forum. Give source of your Information or you dont know anything
Exactly you don't know me so you should better be careful with your mouth.

PHP redirects dont work anymore due to this update.
Web 2.0s only diversify your anchors due to this update.
They are countless of examples.

I told you where to look at, but seems you are blind, or maybe playing dumb has to do with your signature :cool:

Anyway i won't respond back to you, you are a waste of my time, just pointed out what's the truth.
 
Come on, guys. We are here to discuss if this method wok or not, so don't make it a personal discussion.
 
Ok, tell me what links they used to rank. Chek ahrefs and you will know. Why do these people ask for $ 140 for one link ?
ScoopWhoop is a big Indian website and I visit it a lot it had great content.
The links from big domains and that are what is making them rank along with huge content.
The link you shared looks like an automated blog and these don't play any role as these are quite natural to get these links on domains getting traffic.

Eg links they have check-in source code ScoopWhoop and these are just a few they have thousands of these high DA contextual links.

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/20/world/asia/padmaavat-india-rajput.htmlhttps://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-india-39403778https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2018/10/03/when-smoking-was-feminist-act/
 
Google updates change log.
I'm sorry but that is just false.

Traffic can definitely make a difference but it's not mandatory. Most PBNs would become obsolete but they work like charm.

That's what my rank tracker show me at least. If you have a different experience, feel free to share.
 
So, these are spammy links and worth nothing ?
 
Back
Top