Indexing Using Scrapebox/Xrumer better then linklicious?

mullet said:

Hey guys

I was wondering if Google will be more inclined to index my web 2.0 social networks, social bookmarks and 2.0 profile links if I spray about 20-40k scrapebox blog comments and 10-20k xrumer profile links at them vs just dumping them into linklicious pro?

What would be the best?

Cheers

Mullet

Click to expand...

mullet said:

My biggest concern is that its a ton of effort to get those autoapprove scrapebox comments and spammy looking xrumer profiles indexed, even with linkilicious pro or whatever. However, I am almost positive that Google degrades the link value if you force it to find the link. Does that make sense? So my new strategy is to create 10x senuke social bookmarking accounts (about 300x accounts) and to use them to index my backlinks.

Cheers

Mullet

Click to expand...

mullet said:

My biggest concern is that its a ton of effort to get those autoapprove scrapebox comments and spammy looking xrumer profiles indexed, even with linkilicious pro or whatever. However, I am almost positive that Google degrades the link value if you force it to find the link. Does that make sense? So my new strategy is to create 10x senuke social bookmarking accounts (about 300x accounts) and to use them to index my backlinks.

Cheers

Mullet

Click to expand...

Mex-deluxe said:

Your logic is flawed. How do you find the blog pages you can comment on? Via Google! So these pages are already indexed in Google...

Only the forum profiles are hard to index and sometimes and social bookmarks, but not the blog comments.

Click to expand...

snake7 said:

Thanks ? so no to Linklicous is your advice ? I repect your view.

Click to expand...