BrazilianBusinessman
Power Member
- Joined
- Mar 18, 2019
- Messages
- 693
- Reaction score
- 364
Greetings Everyone
I would like to ask/request that if you are going to post on this topic just post things with atleast some backed knowledge and not just personal insights, example:
- I disagree with you because my 10 accounts are working fine X
- I disagree with you because my only account running is doing well X
- Just give it time because blablabla X
This things aint needed, share them on other topic or anything else, save our time and save people from things we cant reproduce.
https://cseweb.ucsd.edu/~ldekoven/publications/following_their_footsteps.pdf
Fact 1: Instagram was aware of both SMM Pannels / Automation Tools / Engagement Groups / Forums
With this premise we can proceed to the first conclusion: IG is aware of all public information being shared out there, so isnt like they dont know the strategies and so on.
Fact 2: IG is FB, and FB was involved in the fake news/ election scandal and they have to prevent it of happening again, so as a matter of fact we can say they will become stricter and stricter instead of lighter.
With this premise we can proceed to the second conclusion: IG will apply harder measures to prevent TOS (Terms of Service) breakers to fly free over their plataform.
Fact 3: IG is aware of not just the automation tools, but also the strategies, the methods used to try to hide you are using automation tools and so on, this lead to the 2 conclusions:
-IG is aware of the tools
-IG is aware of the known methods
-IG is aware of the known solutions
With a combination of Fact 1, Fact 2 and Fact 3 we can already reach the result:
-IG is aware of the known methods and strategies, the automation tools and the ways they are used and they want to prevent TOS breakers to avoid a new scandal.
Besides this we have the fact that people forgot, the Network Level:
https://www.blackhatworld.com/seo/network-purge-how-ig-purge-automation-users-nowadays.1129714/
On a Network Level Is pretty simple to understand it:
Every account needs a connection to operate, without a connection it wont work so for every account we need a connection.
Account + connection = Proceed
Account - connection = Wont Proceed
But the connection/network have something curious on it:
Normal users will have
Account + connection [Residential or Mobile] (Normal Cases)
When Automation users will have
Account + connection [Datacenter] (Normal Cases)
We already saw that even automation users that use Mobile or Real Residential aint getting blocked as the same as the ones using Datacenter proxies (The Majority).
The conclusion is simple: the % of normal users using datacenter proxies is much smaller than the comparison between % using mobile data and residential connection.
We could say, as a example, that the chance of a normal user only use datacenter connection would be 2 or 3 for each 10 accounts connected to a datacenter connection, so 20-30% normal users.
While in mobile connection we could say that from each 10 accounts in average we could see 7-8 accounts of normal users, so 70-80% normal users.
And while in the residential connection we could say that from each 10 accounts in average we could see 5 to 6 normal users, so 50-60% normal users.
In fact this lead to the known conclusion that the probability of a normal user using datacenter proxy is so small compared to the others connections that this is the MOST COMMON USED type of connection by TOS breakers (spammers, automation users, etc).
So maybe instead of talking that the tools are the problem you should see what are behind them, because if the problem is on that the tool will play a small role on the blocks itself.
And yes, sadly most providers that were always flagged are now gone.
I would like to ask/request that if you are going to post on this topic just post things with atleast some backed knowledge and not just personal insights, example:
- I disagree with you because my 10 accounts are working fine X
- I disagree with you because my only account running is doing well X
- Just give it time because blablabla X
This things aint needed, share them on other topic or anything else, save our time and save people from things we cant reproduce.
https://cseweb.ucsd.edu/~ldekoven/publications/following_their_footsteps.pdf
Fact 1: Instagram was aware of both SMM Pannels / Automation Tools / Engagement Groups / Forums
With this premise we can proceed to the first conclusion: IG is aware of all public information being shared out there, so isnt like they dont know the strategies and so on.
Fact 2: IG is FB, and FB was involved in the fake news/ election scandal and they have to prevent it of happening again, so as a matter of fact we can say they will become stricter and stricter instead of lighter.
With this premise we can proceed to the second conclusion: IG will apply harder measures to prevent TOS (Terms of Service) breakers to fly free over their plataform.
Fact 3: IG is aware of not just the automation tools, but also the strategies, the methods used to try to hide you are using automation tools and so on, this lead to the 2 conclusions:
-IG is aware of the tools
-IG is aware of the known methods
-IG is aware of the known solutions
With a combination of Fact 1, Fact 2 and Fact 3 we can already reach the result:
-IG is aware of the known methods and strategies, the automation tools and the ways they are used and they want to prevent TOS breakers to avoid a new scandal.
Besides this we have the fact that people forgot, the Network Level:
https://www.blackhatworld.com/seo/network-purge-how-ig-purge-automation-users-nowadays.1129714/
On a Network Level Is pretty simple to understand it:
Every account needs a connection to operate, without a connection it wont work so for every account we need a connection.
Account + connection = Proceed
Account - connection = Wont Proceed
But the connection/network have something curious on it:
Normal users will have
Account + connection [Residential or Mobile] (Normal Cases)
When Automation users will have
Account + connection [Datacenter] (Normal Cases)
We already saw that even automation users that use Mobile or Real Residential aint getting blocked as the same as the ones using Datacenter proxies (The Majority).
The conclusion is simple: the % of normal users using datacenter proxies is much smaller than the comparison between % using mobile data and residential connection.
We could say, as a example, that the chance of a normal user only use datacenter connection would be 2 or 3 for each 10 accounts connected to a datacenter connection, so 20-30% normal users.
While in mobile connection we could say that from each 10 accounts in average we could see 7-8 accounts of normal users, so 70-80% normal users.
And while in the residential connection we could say that from each 10 accounts in average we could see 5 to 6 normal users, so 50-60% normal users.
In fact this lead to the known conclusion that the probability of a normal user using datacenter proxy is so small compared to the others connections that this is the MOST COMMON USED type of connection by TOS breakers (spammers, automation users, etc).
So maybe instead of talking that the tools are the problem you should see what are behind them, because if the problem is on that the tool will play a small role on the blocks itself.
And yes, sadly most providers that were always flagged are now gone.
![i[Defy]Pi™](/data/avatars/m/96/96763.jpg?1560696167){kind=avatar}
