I won't suggest to go with AMD... I have a laptop with AMD what was promised to perform same as i3 but it's not actually equivalent to it even with Radeon R5 Graphics 2GB... bad experience!
Next computer I build will be based on the Xeon processor E7-8890 v4 chip. AMD that.
During the TL-64 days I was a fan of AMD. I do not see AMD catching up soon. The company is hard hit by funding problems and well behind in other areas. Most of what AMD claims is vaporware - it does not perform in the real world as they claim. AMD, more than Intel, arranges the company benchmarks for the best light. Generally after release people realize that they were again conned.Amd is coming out with naples which is 32 cores/64 threads and 64MB of cache.
You are probably correct. However, look at it another way. When I was last in college (>15 years ago) one of my assignments was to write a program to calculate every possible combination in a game of seven card stud. The purpose of the assignment was to illustrate the difference between stochastic and and heuristic programming. I wrote the program and ran it for a week straight without reaching the end of the possibilities. I am now working with a larger dataset >129 million possibilities. I pulled out the above exercise as a comparison. In less than five seconds, I stochastically computed all possible variations in seven card stud. I then computed my dataset. It averaged less than ten seconds. The calculation is so fast that I compute it rather than read it map from a drive. 10 seconds to compute and > 1.5 minutes to read. But such is the difference in chips.For general consumer chips they will probably not only catch up but beat intel except for the really extreme enthusiasts. The advantage they have is that they aren't going to tying up so much of the die size for intergated graphics.
Xeons are freaking sweet, if I bought that same cpu you are considering I could probably game on ultra 4K/8K until the late 2020's without it being a bottleneck.
I've been an AMD fan for a long time. My first PC (and second) has an AMD Athlon XP CPU in it and these were so much faster than the Pentium 4's that Intel were pushing out. After I made the jump to laptops, it really was Intel that had a monopoly on high powered CPUs. Having said that, I was seriously shafted by Nvidia and the infamous defect they had with mobile GPUs years ago and it spurred me on to get a laptop with an AMD GPU instead. It wasn't super expensive, but it could play Crysis 1 and 2 as well as GTA IV on medium settings at 720p. Anyone that's played GTA IV on the PC knows it's pretty underoptimised.
Eventually I did go back to NVidia again and I'm rocking a GTX 970M just now in my laptop, but I'm so excited about how AMD are going to fight back. The RX 480 was a belter of a GPU at a low price point, and Ryzen should really be a return to the good old Athlon days.
sir take a towel and clean dirty icons on desktop, then you right click and refresh. This refreshes your desktop icons sir + cleans your wallpaper from dirt dear.I am thinking of upgrading my desktop anyone can give me money ? i am broke af
You do know that ryzen and the later arriving APU is a entirely new generation of chips?