Willyfish
Inappropriate behavior toward members + Rule 3.5
- Dec 6, 2019
- 2,494
- 14,243
These illuminatis will all kill us, reptilians!
I will not be vaccinated!
- Thread starter adalbertmgrm
- Start date
- Status
These illuminatis will all kill us, reptilians!
80% of worlds production is being owned by 50 majore companies who owns the rest.You just need to control these 50 to have major control.Since when XD That makes literally no sense for SO MANY reasons.
Top companies. Which top companies? Fortune 500 which employs almost 30 million people? And not a single CEO or executive or whatever is speaking out on this? But you somehow have this information.
Top companies have also spent years and years gathering the best talent. Think Google or Amazon engineers. They are just going to let all of them go? In just 3 years? With global shortage on software engineers just growing every year?
Amazon is definitely a "top company" and it employs almost 800k people. I have not worked ever in HR, but I can imagine the hell of replacing 730 people every day for 3 yearsFrom my experience, 1 manager can deal maybe with 10 people a day for simple functions (delivery person). The more complex the scope of the job is, more resources are needed for hiring. And yes, I am assuming that everyone in Amazon will take the vaccine. But even if we halve that number, it's still way too unmanageable.
In most countries, most of the people will get vaccinated. We're talking of solid 80% here and that number is only excpected to go up. Let's go ahead an assume that 50% of all the people are working age. Who the hell is going to replace the 50% if only 20% are unvaccinated? And in reality it will be a lot less than 20% cause many of those would be small kids who don't need it and people who are too sick to take it, which means they are likely not able to work either.
Beyond that, recent surveys have revealed that more than half of US employers are planning to offer incentives for employees wanting to take a vaccine (that is actually really fucking sad when you think about it). So. The top companies offer incentives for employees (that are the backbone of any company) to take vaccine just so they can fire them later? Do you see where this logic is failing real hard here? I always thought the smallest object in the universe was electron, but I am starting to think it's the brain of anti-vaccine/covid ppl.
Secondly people buying ETF are to dumb to see that they are being used against them,Each ETF uses voting rights of the stocks they bought for their customers and vote people into management who follows their agenda.
Does it sound similar to communism ?
RichardDOT
Newbie
- May 3, 2020
- 39
- 76
ok so now the media have no other choice but to talk about hydroxychloroquine ability to cure covid ... who banned this very Cheap cure again ? or right ? the man who called himself I'm The truth Science none other than Dr.Fauci The Scientist ... l'ets not forgot who help him the FDA , THE WHO , THE GOVERNMENT . i wonder why ban any cure that is cheap and has an outstanding result on curing covid19 and instead of that pushing a unapproved , gene modification , lack testing "Product" into people. if anyone still talking about how good "that product is" he is living in unicorn land
after a year a frigging 365 days and people died and now yeah it's works... this really DISGUSTING .
justalazyseo
Registered Member
- Apr 28, 2021
- 97
- 131
Ehm, I'm sorry but I don't understand. Not "I don't agree with this" understand. More like "These words that this user just wrote seems like a paranoid dictionary that was thrown into washing machine" understand.
What the hell do ETFs now have to do with this? Are we going to talk about flat earth next. Please, let's try and keep this paranoid discussion on one topic at the time.
Also it doesn't matter. The point of my message was that replacing people for all the top companies is pretty much impossible because there is no people with skills needed to replace them. Possibly just not enough people with whatever skills.
RichardDOT
Newbie
- May 3, 2020
- 39
- 76
why are you saying "Possibly just not enough people with whatever skills" where you basis on this ???
RichardDOT
Newbie
- May 3, 2020
- 39
- 76
patriotnews
Elite Member
- Oct 25, 2015
- 1,562
- 1,382
This is a word salad, which highlights the danger of people who don’t understand basic science, pushing and talking about advanced science…
The mRNA vaccine isn’t “gene modification”
mRNA has been through multiple “people testing”… just not the Covid variation, which if one understands mRNA would realize that is less important.
HCQ isn’t a cure, and still only anecdotal studies released on it that show some modicum of success.
Not to mention, the amount of HCQ needed, would limit the supply for those that actually need the medicine as well. So with only anecdotal studies, it is a cost/benefit analysis on whether it is worth it, without any peer reviewed actual studies, vs denying people who need the medicine the medicine…
Not to mention the obvious conflicts that arose in the US over those touting the medicine, such as the fact that many of them had moved substantial stock holdings into the drug manufacturer before touting and pushing it. Which is ethically questionable, especially when there are no true studies done on it at the time, and still no peer reviewed studies completed, just anecdotal studies.
mRNA has been studied more than HCQ for Covid… yet you latched onto the less studies one and called the other “experimental”.
Agencybackground
Regular Member
- Aug 20, 2020
- 328
- 116
I do, you are wrong ok?@adalbertmgrm
Who gives a f.., who gives a sh.., who the f... cares, who the hell cares, who f.... cares what you think about vaccine.
Is it enough clear it or do you need other synonymous?
D
Deleted member 708208
Guest
I honestly think the COVID topic is a horse that's been beaten, cut into pieces, and
FedExed back to the farmer's house.
FedExed back to the farmer's house.
justalazyseo
Registered Member
- Apr 28, 2021
- 97
- 131
Common sense. Logic. 3rd grade math.
Amazon has 800 000 employees. Google has 135 000 employees of which about 20 000 are engineers. Samsung has about 40 000 engineers working for the. Replacing this amount of people in 3 years? I don't think you know how laborous recruitment really is. For company it's much more than just signing a contract. You need to make the ads, vet the candidates, do the interviews, negotiate salaries, sign contract, create all the legal paperwork, take care of insurance and induction etc. Lots of work. And oh wait, HR who are the ones who do this are also people and vaccinated, so they will get fired too.
I will guess that don't work in software engineering or anywhere near it because you would know that there is a shortage of talent. Been for years already. If you live in a right place and have good experience, you get LinkedIn messages fairly often offering you a job.
But OK. We live in age of AI and automation. Let's assume that somehow magically we will be able to do all of this with no labor whatsever.
Then let's talk about the legality of firing most of your employees. Any company would have a massive class action lawsuit real fast. And when half of Googles engineers decide to go together on class action, that is a freaking juggernaut. They get paid a lot, too so they can together afford a team of killer lawyers.
But OK. Let's say that the big companies do some magic trick that they cannot get sued.
Let me then make it real simple for you.
All of the people in the world are 100% of the people right? About 60% are of working age (18-65). The current projections of vaccinations is that >80% of the people in the world will get vaccinated. Let's assume that it will be a little lower in the working age group (say, 60%).
Now this might be too hard, but follow along closely
If more than 60% of the working age group people get fired, it's going to be very hard to replace them. This is because 100 - 60 = 40. And, this is true. 40 is less than 60. I know I'm destroying your reality here, but it really is true. Big numbers are bigger than small numbers. This even works on on any level really. 5 is more than 3, 1000 is more than 5.RichardDOT
Newbie
- May 3, 2020
- 39
- 76
you are living in unicorn land Bro and definitely i don't plan on waking you up or debating with you
It makes no sense because you are not thinking enough.
You asked how come none of top companies ceo is not speaking out.The reason is that nearly all big companies are directly or indirectly owned by 50 major companies.Who controls these companies ?
ETF's management by using their customers stocks voting right.Or do you know a single person who has ETF's and is using his voting rights based on his stock portfolio ?
It matters because you have no clue.Made no research nothing.
The keyword you are missing is industry 4.0 .Everything will be automated started in 2020.
Banks made studies back in 2018 which predicts 35% unemployment in 2025 and 85% unemployment in 2030.You still think these people will be needed?
TWdesigns69
Power Member
- Aug 2, 2015
- 665
- 146
Perfectly said
wpsokw
Senior Member
- Jan 31, 2018
- 1,132
- 460
Did you get covid tested (in the nose) at all?
adalbertmgrm
BANNED
- Jul 16, 2018
- 61
- 455
You misunderstand. I do not reject science. I question whether science should be left to the initiative of a single institution. I ask why doctors and virologists with different views are censored. I have no idea, I just doubt and exercise my right to doubt. It is therefore impossible for me to call upon them to agree with my opinion. Those who defend their ideas like an ideology are those who defend vaccines. It is a correct assumption to say that those who follow the views of a single institution and the monophonic media are sheep. The shepherd may also guide a flock of sheep to the right path, but this does not change the fact that they behave like sheep.
I'm not comparing vaccine advocates with nazis. Please pay attention to the subtleties. How did Adolf Hitler get the support of the German people and what was the psychological structure of the German people who supported them? Are there any similarities with those who are under the influence of a single institution, politician or television today? Definitely yeah! Hitler frightened the German people and made them believe that other nations would destroy the German race. You support WHO today because you are threatened: "You are under threat" This fear leads you to ridicule those who are skeptical of the vaccine. There are even those who say that we are socially harmful. As a result, this immediate support for the WHO is triggered by fear.The difference between today's social psychology and the social psychology that supported former dictators is simply an update of circumstances and time. The outlines are the same because a single institution or monophonic groups are in the square.
Now you say that these monophonic groups or single authoritarian institutions are true and not what they used to be. Maybe you're right or you're not. But this logic is not correct logic and it will never be guaranteed. You say that scientific data is made public, there are reports, and articles are even shared publicly. This logic contains some errors. First, almost every article in the CDC or NCBI is filled with warnings to be cautious. The German vaccine manufacturer, on the other hand, declares that they continue to monitor the development studies and effects even on their official website. (It confirms that scientifically sufficient observations have not been made and should be continued.) In other words, vaccine manufacturers are not as optimistic as the media is optimistic. On the other hand, they can distort articles and reports if they want. Manufacturers, WHO and others can put whatever they want before it. Because you don't manufacture the vaccine yourself, you can't ultimately confirm whether these articles are true or not.
There are and will be moral and honest scientists as well as immoral ones. You can never tell me that all scientists are as clean as a prophet. There can be an immoral person from any profession. And institutions may do an immoral business one day or the future. No matter how well controlled these institutions are, they are run by people, and anything people run can be corrupt or wrong.
There are observations that justify the doubt. BRIEFLY: First, this virus has not been as devastating as it was originally said. At least half of the world would perish when it was first announced. And the virus was so dangerous that you should never even touch the doorknobs, you shouldn't even look out the window. Now I see that even those who don't care are very good. Second, this vaccine has received "emergency use approval". Vaccines that are in laboratory testing are normally unsafe vaccines. But the FDA and WHO approved it with an emergency use label. Under normal circumstances it would never have been approved. Third, Google and other social media sites censor even ordinary people who think differently, and there is a monophonic media. Making fun of and excluding those who say they will not be vaccinated is the biggest evidence of suspicion and caution. Where there is oppression, sarcasm and monotony, something is definitely wrong. (This rule has always been justified.)
Last edited:
seofriends4u
Newbie
- May 27, 2021
- 21
- 0
dont know what to say
Joseph nel
Junior Member
- Sep 30, 2019
- 135
- 40
You seriously recovered?
rocknlight
Senior Member
- Apr 24, 2021
- 1,147
- 1,092
Man illuminati are manipulating you in this thread to make you believe the covid is real stay strong brother flat earth forever !
- Status