_l0ph0nis_
BANNED
- May 20, 2010
- 50
- 6
my desktop is also a inux (gentoo) machine and it simply rocks. Sometimes I need to use Windows in a VM but that's fine. For servers I prefer openbsd...
My feelings are somewhat similar...I hate all distributions using RPMjust for RPM hell :d
I used slackware for a while after my redhat9 server got hacked (dedi server) due to RPMs installed on the system where i didn't even know that they existed (yum etc did not exist yet so autoupdate was not available).
Needed to compile everything myself, like u are doing in BSD now
After that came Gentoo since it compiles with emerge, and now i'm hooked to debian because it is so small.
Eg: I needed Centos for an embedded application that would ONLY be able to connect to its server if it ran Centos (stupid server people) and the 'empty' base image for centos was 2gb big. The same 'empty' base image for debian was only 80mb big.... Since the device only had 1GB of flash memory I had to throw out a lot of RPMs that centos installed but that I would never need for my purposes to get under the 1GB limit. I ended up with a 800mb big working system, but it still proves to me what was true all those years back with redhat9. It installs a lot of junk that you do not need. I love that u can get a basic install with debian without junk and just apt-get all the stuff u need without all the crap you'll never use like RPM based releases.
Either the cd did nnot have Xord [the gui window system] or you did not install it.What's a good FreeBSD live CD to use to try things out?
I believe a year or two ago I tried one and it was just a terminal once loaded and I had no clue what to do. Are there any that have an interface so I can take a look around?
I uses Ubuntu for desktop.
NEVER use it for server because of its annoying SUDO but it's an excellent distro for desktop.
My boxes are mainly running Debian while some old ones are still running CentOS or even RedHat.
BSD is surely one of them...This is a commonly accepted mistake by all...
Linux is not an OS but only a kernel written by Linus Torvaldeus ..
Kernel is the one which acts between OS and HW..
there are a very few true UNix systems and those are Mac OS, IBM aix and HP one i guess .. I few more there are for sure..
Another mistake, the kernel and OS are not separate entities. kernel refers to the core of operating system.This is a commonly accepted mistake by all...
Linux is not an OS but only a kernel written by Linus Torvaldeus ..
Kernel is the one which acts between OS and HW..
there are a very few true UNix systems and those are Mac OS, IBM aix and HP one i guess .. I few more there are for sure..