Maths seem to check out but as I said it is like leaving your security to chance hoping your wallet will not be found. That's why I hope seedless tech in crypto speeds up and supports more coins compatibility and windows compatibility since it follows trustless approach and can't be brute forced
Seedless vs non seedless is irrelevant.
If I give you 10 numbers
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
How does this differ to 10 words?
apple bat carrot fish computer rabbit land space star galaxy
Your understanding of how this works is completely flawed. You need to really study cryptography.
Your statement "seedless wallets cannot be brute forced" is wrong. 100% wrong. There's no other way to say it.
ALL crytography can be brute forced.
Your statement about "leaving your security to chance hoping your wallet will not be found" is also showing a lack of understanding.
I apologize if I seem rude here, but I have to be blunt. It's like you're telling me that 1+1=3 and no matter what I say, you're insisting it's 3.
It doesn't matter if your wallet is found. It's not private. It's not meant to be private. You share your wallet address with other people.
All public keys, regardless of whether you represent them with binary, decimal, hexadecimal or seed lists contain your private key.
All a seed list is, is a representation of every possible private wallet address that is possible.
Let's take a simple example.
3 seed words, with 4 seed word variations.
This gives you a total of 4^3 = 64
This means there is 64 possible wallet addresses.
Imagine each wallet is like a physical wallet, and we put them in a box
You can't see which boxes have empty wallets, and which have actual wallets.
Those wallets have addresses in binary, hex, decimal.
The 13th box in binary is 1101
In decmial it's 13
In hex its 0xd
In octal its 15
Let's say the words are "apple car fish hat"
Each combination represents 1 address.
So the box decimal 13, might be "fish fish hat car"
Does this make it less secure?
If so, how?
It's only a representation that makes it convenient for humans.
It still represents the SAME private key.
Technically the seed list doesn't represent a 'wallet', but rather is input for a deterministic function to generate your master private key, which through key deriviation can then be used to create a path to your different crypto wallets.
But for this example, that's not relevant.
What you are not understanding is that seed lists are only representations. How can you physically have anything, without anything? You're thinking seedless means there's no numerical representation. If there's no numerical representation, then how is there any sort of wallet to begin with? There's just, 0's
I feel like I'm going round in circles here.
It's not my job to education you on crytography. Choose to believe what you want to believe.
