I don't understand people who use ChatGPT
- Thread starter sscaz
- Start date
- Jul 21, 2014
- 1,060
- 365
Why pay for quilbot when i can code a bot to write unlimited AI articles and post them? Also you do realise that chatgpt can write 100% human articles ? besides, quillbot only allows a certain number of characters for free, also they don't always pass the plagiarism checker, even after paraphrasing!
D
Deleted member 731332
Guest
2016 wants it’s method back.
sscaz
BANNED - Discussion of Prohibited Activities
- Jul 18, 2022
- 5,693
- 5,815
I tested around 1000 articles that have been paraphrased by quillbot and always passed plagiarism checker, they always rank, i have no fear of my posts being shut down, websites punished etc which isn't the same for ai generated/written content is what i meant with this post.
- Jul 21, 2014
- 1,060
- 365
With all due respect if your AI articles aren't passing the AI detector, it's either you're using a simple prompt or you're doing something wrong, or using a very specific niche! I've been ranking for AI content since last year, it's less work than quillbot! Just my opinion and experience, I respect yours!
sscaz
BANNED - Discussion of Prohibited Activities
- Jul 18, 2022
- 5,693
- 5,815
I did write really detailed ChatGPT prompts, always tagged as Ai and a lot of time missinformation which is even more harmfull, also can't target a lot of niches that i am interested in like reviews for example.
- Apr 15, 2021
- 3,120
- 1,645
The only thing wrong are the AI detectors. They even detect human as AI.
Quillbot is paid and doesn't have the same abilities as Chatgpt. It's based on the same architecture though. It's just a thing of the past.
sscaz
BANNED - Discussion of Prohibited Activities
- Jul 18, 2022
- 5,693
- 5,815
Quillbot is still safe to use and gets your articles safely ranked while chatgpt is ticklin time bomb
BlackHatSoda
Regular Member
- Oct 6, 2009
- 393
- 329
I wouldn't trust those wonky "AI content detectors" you see out now. Most can be so easily fooled it's not even funny. Toss in one extra space or misspell one word and a lot of them think it's "human". For sure, the generated content detection Google would be using is far, far better. Even OpenAI said they fingerprint their content, even though if you ask ChatGPT if it fingerprints its output it will deny it. But Sam Altman himself said they fingerprint their content so they can detect it. And if they can detect it, so can anyone with proper funding.
I wouldn't rely on copy n paste ChatGPT content working for SEO for very long. Just a matter of time before Google rolls out an anti-spam update to deal with it.
rideronjourney
Regular Member
- Jul 3, 2016
- 256
- 86
best way is to generate the content with AI and then re-write that article yourself or hire someone to do it.
sscaz
BANNED - Discussion of Prohibited Activities
- Jul 18, 2022
- 5,693
- 5,815
Nice explanation, on point
dericklogs
Newbie
- Mar 20, 2023
- 6
- 1
Nice
Johnpeterburs
Power Member
- Apr 25, 2021
- 660
- 181
ChatGPT replaces every single content writer on the planet. GPT4 is doing the change. Unless you find alternative sourcing of income, being a content writer, there is no profession anymore. Charge up and move on, let's not regret it later.
- Nov 11, 2018
- 12,111
- 10,876
You cannot rank 1 and your site will get hit sooner or later for duplicate content as paraphrasing is duplicate content. Because now you got exactly same information that you Paraphrased.
First learn what is duplicate content here:
https://www.blackhatworld.com/seo/do-spin-contents-ranks-now.1332717/#post-14396266
MKSKS
Banned for failing to resolve dispute.
- Jul 11, 2013
- 6,098
- 4,464
ChatGPT does more compared to tools like quillbot.
One can give a topic and instructions and can get the output accordingly.
I use both of them and also my old gold method using gtranslate using multi translate process to generate a unique and quality readable copy.
But when you need HQ researched content it's only human writers that can give that quality.
Google knows everything but for some reason doesn't care about everything.
It does care about few things and that's why it gives those regular update scares.
They are messed up with lot of things in their updates and algo and that's why paraphrased content, spun content, translated content, and my old multi translated content still works.
The only difference is you need to plan your content structure and optimize it for SEO.
Splogging or as most people say autoblogging still rocks only thing the process has changed with time.
One can give a topic and instructions and can get the output accordingly.
I use both of them and also my old gold method using gtranslate using multi translate process to generate a unique and quality readable copy.
But when you need HQ researched content it's only human writers that can give that quality.
Google knows everything but for some reason doesn't care about everything.
It does care about few things and that's why it gives those regular update scares.
They are messed up with lot of things in their updates and algo and that's why paraphrased content, spun content, translated content, and my old multi translated content still works.
The only difference is you need to plan your content structure and optimize it for SEO.
Splogging or as most people say autoblogging still rocks only thing the process has changed with time.
Jerk55
Regular Member
- Jul 14, 2020
- 495
- 555
Better write it from scratch then. The only difference between writing an article from scratch and rewriting a ChatGPT article is the few minutes of research needed for the former.
Maverick1111
BANNED
- Jul 6, 2017
- 2,480
- 679
So you have your own bot?
- Jul 21, 2014
- 1,060
- 365
Own bot that posts, the rest of the work is done on chatgpt.