How To Spin Articles Properly - Advanced Article Spinning Techniques

Hey Matthew, thanks for the video, I just finished watching it. :D

There is one thing I'm a bit confused about, though. Maybe I missed it, but it looked like you made the anchor text that goes to your money site only appear 50% of the time. In other words, some of the articles wouldn't even have a single link to your money site. Was this done on purpose, or did I misinterpret the video?

Also, I saw you put the money site link with related anchor text in the article twice. Which means sometimes you could get 1, or 2 links to your site. Is 2 links to your site too much? If I wanted to "play it safe" and have at just one link to my site at all times, but sometimes it would appear in one paragraph or sentence, and other times it would appear elsewhere, would that be possible?

Thanks again for that super informative video. I now feel confident enough that I can effectively spin my articles and use them for my 2.0s. The real issue now is figuring out how to create 50 Web 2.0 accounts quickly. :(
 
Advertise on BHW
Magicodar said:
Alright, please write your full review about WordAi when you have tested out, whether it is viable to replace manually spinning of article (your method).
Click to expand...

Hi,

I'm actually on using it as part of a future wider case study so I'll have you covered :)

Quattroporte said:
Hey Matthew, thanks for the video, I just finished watching it. :D

There is one thing I'm a bit confused about, though. Maybe I missed it, but it looked like you made the anchor text that goes to your money site only appear 50% of the time. In other words, some of the articles wouldn't even have a single link to your money site. Was this done on purpose, or did I misinterpret the video?

Also, I saw you put the money site link with related anchor text in the article twice. Which means sometimes you could get 1, or 2 links to your site. Is 2 links to your site too much? If I wanted to "play it safe" and have at just one link to my site at all times, but sometimes it would appear in one paragraph or sentence, and other times it would appear elsewhere, would that be possible?

Thanks again for that super informative video. I now feel confident enough that I can effectively spin my articles and use them for my 2.0s. The real issue now is figuring out how to create 50 Web 2.0 accounts quickly. :(
Click to expand...

Hi,

The anchor text is because I put it in multiple times so the link actually moves around the article naturally.

Doing this combined with the contextual links mean there really is no detectable footprint for linking or text - and sometimes you will get links without any moneysite link which future fools Googles into identifying 2 pieces of content as coming from 1 source.

Trust me, I've thought this inside out back to front covering all bases ^^
 
MatthewWoodward said:
Hi,

The anchor text is because I put it in multiple times so the link actually moves around the article naturally.

Doing this combined with the contextual links mean there really is no detectable footprint for linking or text - and sometimes you will get links without any moneysite link which future fools Googles into identifying 2 pieces of content as coming from 1 source.

Trust me, I've thought this inside out back to front covering all bases ^^
Click to expand...

Oh I have no doubt you have this down to a science :). I'm still a bit confused though...if you have a few articles with no links to your money site, what do you do with these? They're just articles with links to various authority sites, but none to yours. How would this help to future fool Google when it doesn't even know the articles aren't related to your site in the first place?
 
Quattroporte said:
Oh I have no doubt you have this down to a science :). I'm still a bit confused though...if you have a few articles with no links to your money site, what do you do with these? They're just articles with links to various authority sites, but none to yours. How would this help to future fool Google when it doesn't even know the articles aren't related to your site in the first place?
Click to expand...

Although this would obviously provide no benefit in terms of link juice to your site, what it does do is create more confusion and harder for pattern analysis to take place to detect it as duplicate content.

Sort of like throwing a stone in one direction to distract someone, but running in another :P
 
I must say, I stopped watching videos about IM since 3 years ago ( got fed up of all that WF shit being rehashed ) unless they are really HQ, and this is one of them. Awesome video my friend, along with ALL the others you have produced! Although I know most of the things I saw in your other videos, still I spent some pretty good hours gaining knowledge from them, especially in spinning. Rep+thanks!

I plan to use this on my HQ web 2.0 properties, however since I am quite strict when building my Tier 1 links, I have one question though: Based on your experience, on AVERAGE, how many articles can you produce from that super spun article so that all the produced ones have 90%+ uniqueness when compared to each other while still being perfectly readable and able to pass human moderation? I know the answer varies based on the article/topic,nr of words,etc.. but I would really appreciate an example or approximate number, thanks a lot!
 
THUNDERELVI said:
I must say, I stopped watching videos about IM since 3 years ago ( got fed up of all that WF shit being rehashed ) unless they are really HQ, and this is one of them. Awesome video my friend, along with ALL the others you have produced! Although I know most of the things I saw in your other videos, still I spent some pretty good hours gaining knowledge from them, especially in spinning. Rep+thanks!

I plan to use this on my HQ web 2.0 properties, however since I am quite strict when building my Tier 1 links, I have one question though: Based on your experience, on AVERAGE, how many articles can you produce from that super spun article so that all the produced ones have 90%+ uniqueness when compared to each other while still being perfectly readable and able to pass human moderation? I know the answer varies based on the article/topic,nr of words,etc.. but I would really appreciate an example or approximate number, thanks a lot!
Click to expand...

Hahaha its pretty much all of those things that led me to creating my blog :)

I would say you can get around 100-125 on a good spin but there isn't really an average, each article is different :)

TheN20 said:
Just a fantastic guide, thank you!
Click to expand...

Thanks!
 
MatthewWoodward said:
Hahaha its pretty much all of those things that led me to creating my blog :)

I would say you can get around 100-125 on a good spin but there isn't really an average, each article is different :)
Click to expand...

Yeah I understand, I read your blog post about the WF mods how they deleted your HQ threads just simply because noobs would be exposed to the "REAL" truth that there is no unique money making method to make $1k/day or rank #1 in Google without doing anything and their sales would drop. Glad you switched here, BHW FTW! :D
And once again thanks for your answer man!
 
WOW!!!
such a great post - will watch the video later when I have some time since I am sure it is worth it!

BTW this video focuses on spinning articles only or on ranking too? is it possible to rank videos/site on google thanks to this method or do we need other softwares than TBS ?

Thanks in advance,
Chen
 
Hey Matt, I sent you a PM about something...hope to hear from you soon. :)

Edit: Besides the PM, I just watched the 6th video on your Link Building series, and I have a question about it (it relates to this thread, I promise :D). You say in that video, to post 5-10 posts per property. Are these posts just the spun articles you've used from this video? So, if you created 50 articles from one, you'd end up with 10 Web 2.0s if you posted 5 times on each.

Now it makes sense why you only had the money site links appear in some of the articles. I feel like an idiot lol. I was thinking you were taking some of these articles that had no links to the money site whatsoever, and placing them by themselves on Web 2.0s with no other posts. But now I think you use them for extra posts in your 2.0s. So, you'd have 5 spun articles, and 1-5 of the posts would have a link to the money site? Is that correct? :)
 
Last edited:
even thought i have been doing it for a while, still watched all the video and learned few good things, like img tags.
 
THUNDERELVI said:
Yeah I understand, I read your blog post about the WF mods how they deleted your HQ threads just simply because noobs would be exposed to the "REAL" truth that there is no unique money making method to make $1k/day or rank #1 in Google without doing anything and their sales would drop. Glad you switched here, BHW FTW!
And once again thanks for your answer man!
Click to expand...


Well I was always here and don't worry, I have a trick up my sleeve for WF in the coming months :)


Fed up of watching them scam people.


henhen10 said:
WOW!!!
such a great post - will watch the video later when I have some time since I am sure it is worth it!


BTW this video focuses on spinning articles only or on ranking too? is it possible to rank videos/site on google thanks to this method or do we need other softwares than TBS ?


Thanks in advance,
Chen
Click to expand...


For ranking websites please see http://www.blackhatworld.com/blackh...site-google-2-hour-video-tutorial-series.html


Quattroporte said:
Hey Matt, I sent you a PM about something...hope to hear from you soon.


Edit: Besides the PM, I just watched the 6th video on your Link Building series, and I have a question about it (it relates to this thread, I promise ). You say in that video, to post 5-10 posts per property. Are these posts just the spun articles you've used from this video? So, if you created 50 articles from one, you'd end up with 10 Web 2.0s if you posted 5 times on each.


Now it makes sense why you only had the money site links appear in some of the articles. I feel like an idiot lol. I was thinking you were taking some of these articles that had no links to the money site whatsoever, and placing them by themselves on Web 2.0s with no other posts. But now I think you use them for extra posts in your 2.0s. So, you'd have 5 spun articles, and 1-5 of the posts would have a link to the money site? Is that correct?
Click to expand...


I suck at PM's sorry, theres like a 60 second delay between each one so I just get annoyed and rarely reply to them sorry.


Yes they are spun like this, so perhaps I'll get 10 articles spun and then randomly select 5-10 of them from that pool for each site.


So no 2 sites have the same 'set' of articles on if that makes sense?


Each web 2.0 site (regardless of how many articles) should only link to the money site once. The other articles should link to other websites in your niche and some have no links at all.


R0meo said:
even thought i have been doing it for a while, still watched all the video and learned few good things, like img tags.
Click to expand...


Thanks very much :) Perhaps you can teach us something ^^
 
Hey Matt, I got a quick question for you. I've been doing free paragraph spinning as apart of my gigs. I don't think that is a benefit except for hiding what would be small footprints. What do you think about paragraph spinning?

Here's my example:
{{Lets|Lets us|Let us|I might as well} {say|point out|state|declare} {for|just for|that for} {argument|discussion|case} {that this|this|in which this} {is|is actually|is definitely} {my|the} {first|1st|very first} {paragraph|section}.|{This could be|This may be|This might be|This can be} {my|the} {first|very first|1st} {paragraph|passage|section} {for|intended for|pertaining to} argument {sake|reasons}|{Just for|Simply for|Exclusively for} {an|some sort of|a certain} {example|illustration|case in point}, {lets|let us|let me} {say|state|point out} {this is|this is certainly} {my|the} {first|1st|very first} {paragraph|passage|section}}

{{This|The following is} {obviously|naturally|certainly|undoubtedly} {my|the} {second|2nd|next} {paragraph|passage|section}}.|{{My|The} {second|2nd} {paragraph|passage|section} {would be|will be|could be|can be} used {here|in this article} {as an example|as one example}|{As an example|For example|To give an example} {this is|this is certainly} {my|the} {second|2nd} {paragraph|passage|section}.}

{Just for {fun|enjoyment} {lets|let us} {say|point out} {this is|that this is certainly} {my|the} {last|final} {paragraph|passage|section}|{My|The|Our} {last|final} {paragraph|passage|section} {is this|is actually} {section|area|segment} {for an|to have an} {example|illustration}|{This is|This really is} {my|the|our} {last|final} {and|as well as} {final|remaining|closing} {example|instance|illustration} {of a|of the} {paragraph|passage|section}}

"argument" in the first paragraph, "used" in the second, and "just for" in the third will create a foot print if the article is used too much.

However, if I spin the paragraphs the words that aren't spun tend to dance around randomly which makes it more unique. I don't know if there are any other benefits besides this though, what do you think??

{
{{Lets|Lets us|Let us|I might as well} {say|point out|state|declare} {for|just for|that for} {argument|discussion|case} {that this|this|in which this} {is|is actually|is definitely} {my|the} {first|1st|very first} {paragraph|section}.|{This could be|This may be|This might be|This can be} {my|the} {first|very first|1st} {paragraph|passage|section} {for|intended for|pertaining to} argument {sake|reasons}|{Just for|Simply for|Exclusively for} {an|some sort of|a certain} {example|illustration|case in point}, {lets|let us|let me} {say|state|point out} {this is|this is certainly} {my|the} {first|1st|very first} {paragraph|passage|section}}

{{This|The following is} {obviously|naturally|certainly|undoubtedly} {my|the} {second|2nd|next} {paragraph|passage|section}.|{My|The} {second|2nd} {paragraph|passage|section} {would be|will be|could be|can be} used {here|in this article} {as an example|as one example}|{As an example|For example|To give an example} {this is|this is certainly} {my|the} {second|2nd} {paragraph|passage|section}.}

{Just for {fun|enjoyment} {lets|let us} {say|point out} {this is|that this is certainly} {my|the} {last|final} {paragraph|passage|section}|{My|The|Our} {last|final} {paragraph|passage|section} {is this|is actually} {section|area|segment} {for an|to have an} {example|illustration}|{This is|This really is} {my|the|our} {last|final} {and|as well as} {final|remaining|closing} {example|instance|illustration} {of a|of the} {paragraph|passage|section}}
|
{Just for {fun|enjoyment} {lets|let us} {say|point out} {this is|that this is certainly} {my|the} {last|final} {paragraph|passage|section}|{My|The|Our} {last|final} {paragraph|passage|section} {is this|is actually} {section|area|segment} {for an|to have an} {example|illustration}|{This is|This really is} {my|the|our} {last|final} {and|as well as} {final|remaining|closing} {example|instance|illustration} {of a|of the} {paragraph|passage|section}}

{{This|The following is} {obviously|naturally|certainly|undoubtedly} {my|the} {second|2nd|next} {paragraph|passage|section}.|{My|The} {second|2nd} {paragraph|passage|section} {would be|will be|could be|can be} used {here|in this article} {as an example|as one example}|{As an example|For example|To give an example} {this is|this is certainly} {my|the} {second|2nd} {paragraph|passage|section}.}

{{Lets|Lets us|Let us|I might as well} {say|point out|state|declare} {for|just for|that for} {argument|discussion|case} {that this|this|in which this} {is|is actually|is definitely} {my|the} {first|1st|very first} {paragraph|section}.|{This could be|This may be|This might be|This can be} {my|the} {first|very first|1st} {paragraph|passage|section} {for|intended for|pertaining to} argument {sake|reasons}|{Just for|Simply for|Exclusively for} {an|some sort of|a certain} {example|illustration|case in point}, {lets|let us|let me} {say|state|point out} {this is|this is certainly} {my|the} {first|1st|very first} {paragraph|passage|section}}
|
{{This|The following is} {obviously|naturally|certainly|undoubtedly} {my|the} {second|2nd|next} {paragraph|passage|section}.|{My|The} {second|2nd} {paragraph|passage|section} {would be|will be|could be|can be} used {here|in this article} {as an example|as one example}|{As an example|For example|To give an example} {this is|this is certainly} {my|the} {second|2nd} {paragraph|passage|section}.}

{{Lets|Lets us|Let us|I might as well} {say|point out|state|declare} {for|just for|that for} {argument|discussion|case} {that this|this|in which this} {is|is actually|is definitely} {my|the} {first|1st|very first} {paragraph|section}.|{This could be|This may be|This might be|This can be} {my|the} {first|very first|1st} {paragraph|passage|section} {for|intended for|pertaining to} argument {sake|reasons}|{Just for|Simply for|Exclusively for} {an|some sort of|a certain} {example|illustration|case in point}, {lets|let us|let me} {say|state|point out} {this is|this is certainly} {my|the} {first|1st|very first} {paragraph|passage|section}}

{Just for {fun|enjoyment} {lets|let us} {say|point out} {this is|that this is certainly} {my|the} {last|final} {paragraph|passage|section}|{My|The|Our} {last|final} {paragraph|passage|section} {is this|is actually} {section|area|segment} {for an|to have an} {example|illustration}|{This is|This really is} {my|the|our} {last|final} {and|as well as} {final|remaining|closing} {example|instance|illustration} {of a|of the} {paragraph|passage|section}}
}
 
Last edited:
This post contains really some effective techniques to row or spin articles. Thanks for this great post!
 
Magicodar said:
Can I have your skype id? matt?
Click to expand...


Thats reserved for consultation clients sorry or I would never get any work done!


Nexusx2 said:
Hey Matt, I got a quick question for you. I've been doing free paragraph spinning as apart of my gigs. I don't think that is a benefit except for hiding what would be small footprints. What do you think about paragraph spinning?
Click to expand...


Yes adding another level of spinning can't hurt and will allow you to use the article more.


My tutorial teaches people how to work out how many times they can safely use an article before it stops being unique - so as long as it fits within that, add as many pargraphs/whatevers as you want :)


heisenbargiced said:
This post contains really some effective techniques to row or spin articles. Thanks for this great post!
Click to expand...


No worrys :)
 
Advertise on BHW
You must log in or register to reply here.
Sign up now!

Main Menu

Home Main Forum List Black Hat SEO White Hat SEO BHW Newbie Guide Blogging Black Hat Tools Social Media Downloads

Marketplace

Account Selling Content / Copywriting EBooks / Methods Hosting Misc Proxies For Sale SEO - Link building SEO - Packages Social Media Social Media - Panels Web Design More

Making Money

Affiliate Programs Hire a Freelancer IM Journeys Making Money Pay Per Click Site Flipping Want to Buy

BlackHat World

Dispute Resolution Forum Suggestions & Feedback Introductions Lounge
Back
Top