How to Rank - A Quick Guide for Newbies

lightningblitz said:
YES. That is actually smarter and will rank you better.
Click to expand...

Can you explain in brief how come web2.0s based on different topic with different URL can help rank me better. To me ,the only advantage seems to be their age.
 
Advertise on BHW
kopioh said:
I have a few questions:

If I have 1 money site, 3 web 2.0 as 1st tier and Others as 2nd tier:

- how many pages of articles do I need to build each of my web 2.0? I read somewhere that 5 pages are sufficient. After that, do I still have to add more articles periodically and continue link to the money site?

- I read that to avoid Google detection:
- all 1st & 2nd tiers should not be indexed ie strictly no webmaster/analytics. Is this correct?
- different emails to be used for each 1st & 2nd tiers. Is this correct?

- Is this tier structure designed to protect the money site ie if Google detect them, only the 1st & 2nd tiers will be banned but the money site will be intact?

- Which is better: GScrapper or Scrapebox?
Click to expand...

Scrapebox is better.

As far as your other questions, do not use google anything on tier properties.

If you build three tiers, your tier one will eventually index.

Yes, use unique email for each property.

You only need a couple pages of content. A web 2.0 is like a PBN. Once your link rolls off page one it is not as strong.

amarinder said:
Can you explain in brief how come web2.0s based on different topic with different URL can help rank me better. To me ,the only advantage seems to be their age.
Click to expand...

Age = Authority and Trust.

This of this like a parasite. You put a post on 'Facebook' to rank. It does not matter if Facebooks links are about social media, your page still ranks easier.

Same theory. The link juice, age and trust still helps you rank.

You have two years of trust and juice which will greatly help.
 
What if top 10 has no on page optimization(no exact KW match) but has authority sites?

Let's say my keyword is cure acne scars and there's no exact title match nor description match for the keyword, but there are authority sites like webmd doctor oz.

I assume they're difficult to rank b/c they simply got too many backlinks to get outranked?
 
Last edited:
popcorn9257 said:
What if top 10 has no on page optimization(no exact KW match) but has authority sites?

Let's say my keyword is cure acne scars and there's no exact title match nor description match for the keyword, but there are authority sites like webmd doctor oz.

I assume they're difficult to rank b/c they simply got too many backlinks to get outranked?
Click to expand...

The answer is, it depends.

Look at page two or three to see what sites are targeting the KW and not ranking. That is how you see how strong the competition really is.
 
Well, great article.. This will really helpful others to know about how to rank our websites.Keep Sharing. These types of article is precious for the peoples.
 
I have several questions to ask (Thanks OP for the great information)

1. Do you wait for all the links like bookmarks, articles submissions, blog comments, to get indexed (shown up in google) before linking your web 2 to your money sites?
 
No I do not. I let it rip fairly quickly.

When I build mine up and the Web 2.0 targets a long tail no one else is after I should rank top 100 without any links, so I find it safe to link right away.
 
@lightningblitz
I'm new to seo and complete noob, I tried to rank a .xyz domain and I started doing it 1st week of december 2015 I just follow some tutorial here in bhw. Now I'm stuck on page 2 on my main keyword. Can I pm you my site and check it if you have extra time? :) thank you.
 
This is a basic and typical tutorial for Seo stuff, but i think many people do not follow step by step
 
Sure, you can shoot me your website and I will look when I get a chance.
 
1. When you say, to spin the article unique and readable by spinning , Do they have to be 100% copyscape pass ?
2. And if I am building 12 Web2.0s for the same article, can I use same email while registration? And diferent email for the next set of web2.0s for the next article? I would probably go mad so making new email accounts if I have to use new email for every web2.0?

3. I have dug up over 30 web2.0s that are 1-2 year old. As my focus is to rank 10 articles out of 150 articles first, how should I focus them? Towards home page website, or for 3 articles only or divide 30 among web 2.0s evenly for the 10 articles I want to rank?
 
1. When you say, to spin the article unique and readable by spinning , Do they have to be 100% copyscape pass ?
2. And if I am building 12 Web2.0s for the same article, can I use same email while registration? And diferent email for the next set of web2.0s for the next article? I would probably go mad so making new email accounts if I have to use new email for every web2.0?

3. I have dug up over 30 web2.0s that are 1-2 year old. As my focus is to rank 10 articles out of 150 articles first, how should I focus them? Towards home page website, or for 3 articles only or divide 30 among web 2.0s evenly for the 10 articles I want to rank?
 
amarinder said:
1. When you say, to spin the article unique and readable by spinning , Do they have to be 100% copyscape pass ?
2. And if I am building 12 Web2.0s for the same article, can I use same email while registration? And diferent email for the next set of web2.0s for the next article? I would probably go mad so making new email accounts if I have to use new email for every web2.0?

3. I have dug up over 30 web2.0s that are 1-2 year old. As my focus is to rank 10 articles out of 150 articles first, how should I focus them? Towards home page website, or for 3 articles only or divide 30 among web 2.0s evenly for the 10 articles I want to rank?
Click to expand...

amarinder said:
1. When you say, to spin the article unique and readable by spinning , Do they have to be 100% copyscape pass ?
2. And if I am building 12 Web2.0s for the same article, can I use same email while registration? And diferent email for the next set of web2.0s for the next article? I would probably go mad so making new email accounts if I have to use new email for every web2.0?

3. I have dug up over 30 web2.0s that are 1-2 year old. As my focus is to rank 10 articles out of 150 articles first, how should I focus them? Towards home page website, or for 3 articles only or divide 30 among web 2.0s evenly for the 10 articles I want to rank?
Click to expand...

Yes, you want it 100% Copyscape passed and completely unique, plus readable.

You want unique email for each Web 2.0, at least when making two on the same platform.

You want to build direct links to the pages you want to rank. Do not worry about home page.
 
Thanks for the great tips bout my site, I will do all your tips today :) Again thanks sir.
 
Advertise on BHW
You must log in or register to reply here.
Sign up now!

Main Menu

Home Main Forum List Black Hat SEO White Hat SEO BHW Newbie Guide Blogging Black Hat Tools Social Media Downloads

Marketplace

Account Selling Content / Copywriting EBooks / Methods Hosting Misc Proxies For Sale SEO - Link building SEO - Packages Social Media Social Media - Panels Web Design More

Making Money

Affiliate Programs Hire a Freelancer IM Journeys Making Money Pay Per Click Site Flipping Want to Buy

BlackHat World

Dispute Resolution Forum Suggestions & Feedback Introductions Lounge
Back
Top