i want to know more about this?300-400 words on a supporting article is playing it dangerously thin, that's barely enough to clear your throat before Google loses interest. I'd give those room to breathe, at least enough to fully answer the one question they exist for. But genuinely, has anyone tested thin supporting pages against beefier ones head to head, or is this all just forum folklore at this point?
I prefer publishing the pillar article first then supporting it with related post and internal linking.Hi, hope you are all well.
I have 2 websites and plan to open another one, and one thing has stuck on my mind last few days, how strategically to publish articles for better authority?
Should i post first most important in depth written article and then post smaller articles and link to the main?Or vise versa?
And what about categories of the niche, first finish with one category then start other? for example at the beginning book reviews then authors of books and so one...?
I came accross words topical silo, can you give me a real example and share something that i havent asked but is important?
I'd go with the main article first. Then I'd add supporting articles as I cover more topics.Hi, hope you are all well.
I have 2 websites and plan to open another one, and one thing has stuck on my mind last few days, how strategically to publish articles for better authority?
Should i post first most important in depth written article and then post smaller articles and link to the main?Or vise versa?
And what about categories of the niche, first finish with one category then start other? for example at the beginning book reviews then authors of books and so one...?
I came accross words topical silo, can you give me a real example and share something that i havent asked but is important?
Thanks