How to Mass Produce Unique Readable Content for Mini-Nets

The potential benefit of web 2.0 networks is well known around the forum. What is also well-known is that it's a real pain to create unique content for large networks.

There is active debate at the moment as to whether or not unique content is required. This thread is not a place to hold that debate. It's for people who have decided that they need readable & unique content for their networks.


Step 1

Find a 500 word article about the subject you're promoting. Make sure the article does not include too many specific details or unusual words.


Step 2

Run the article through The Best Spinner and hand-spin the article to a uniqueness level of 90% or higher.

This is time consuming. Working at a comfortable pace, it's going to take you all day to get a readable output from all spins - but it is easily possible to achieve.

Push-button spinning simply does not work, because the meaning of words is subject to context. It is far beyond the capability of any spinning program to correctly read context, and will be for some time.

Some tips for hand-spinning:

• Always make a good percentage of your sentences optional.
• Split up sentences and make parts of them optional too.
• Use the array of 2 and 3 word synonym phrases available.
• Provide the most variation at the beginning and at the end of the article.
• Make full use of nested spinning.

If you've done your hand-spinning right, you'll be delighted to find that you've made a master spintax that can be transformed into many unique readable articles of varying length, sentence structure and word count.

Just how many is up to you - I personally tend to go for 50, if you go higher than this, the uniqueness may suffer as a whole.

Despite the capabilities of the best spinner, you'll sometimes have duplicate sentences or phrases coming up between selected spun outputs. This is, unfortunately, unavoidable.

There is a solution to this, however..


Step 3

Download Dupe Free Pro (thanks to KidShaleen for making me aware of this).

Dupe Free Pro allows you to instantly compare 2 articles and provides a duplicate percentage score (what % of the 2 articles are the same). The best feature, though, is that it highlights the sentences (or sentence fragments) that are duplicated, no matter where they are in the article.

Let's say you get 2 spin outputs from your master spintax, and put them into Dupe Free Pro. The program then tells you that the duplication score is 15%, and highlights the duplicated areas.

Now all you have to do is jump in and add some simple variations to those sentences - it can't take more than 1 minute to do.

Now the article is 100% unique.


Step 4

Repeat the whole process with 2 more articles.


Results

Cost = a few days work (if you went all-out, you could get it done in one day)

Reward = 150 x readable 100% unique articles

Micallef

Nice tutorial.. but what did you mean by 'does not include too many specific details or unusual words' ?

MisterGemini said:

Nice tutorial.. but what did you mean by 'does not include too many specific details or unusual words' ?

Click to expand...

This is just to make spinning easier. The Best Spinner works by gathering synonyms, and there will be more synonyms for common words.

For example, "good" will have a lot more synonyms listed than "magnificent".

Further, if there are too many specific names, there will be synonyms available at all and you'll have to rewrite them yourself, which takes more time.

Does it really matter if your mini net content is just auto spun nonsense? I thought mini net sites are just for backlinks?

Care to elaborate more about

Run the article through The Best Spinner and hand-spin the article to a uniqueness level of 90% or higher.

Click to expand...

?

MisterGemini said:

Nice tutorial.. but what did you mean by 'does not include too many specific details or unusual words' ?

Click to expand...

Avoid articles with bullets, numbering, or have specific words like 'jaguar xj6'. Articles like 'how to lose fat', 'how to travel cheaply' which don't talk about anything really too specific are best for spin, as they don't leave any footprint (i.e. a keyword that is repeating from one to another).

I would also suggest to find a few topic you can write a lot about. By a lot I mean topic that have many sub-ideas so you can write one paragraph per idea and have about 10 paragraphs in an article. Ideally the ideas should be unrelated to each other. That is, if you make any paragraph optional, the article still make sense. Now, for each paragraph you write 2-3 more entirely different paragraphs, and then for each sentence in each paragraph (including the equivalent paragraphs) you write 2-3 more equivalent sentences. Only then you add word/phrase synonyms to everything. This is a lot of work but it is worth it, as if you generate 5-paragraph articles you can have over 1000 spins with high uniqueness. This will take you a week or more to spin but then you will have shitloads of content.

mootonandy said:

Does it really matter if your mini net content is just auto spun nonsense? I thought mini net sites are just for backlinks?

Click to expand...

As I've detailed in another thread, Google has cracked down on so-called linkwheels.

They're getting better at filtering the rubbish from their index, and may not "count" auto-spun rubbish blogs, either for ranking or backlink sources.

If they haven't implemented these measures yet (and they almost certainly have), they will do so in the near future.

I believe unique content is necessary in the construction of networks that can pack a heavy punch and survive into the future.

hello Micallef,
i am about to take action on this strategy,but i am not good at writing.
Do you know or can you suggest someone who can do this for me?

Micallef said:

As I've detailed in another thread, Google has cracked down on so-called linkwheels.

They're getting better at filtering the rubbish from their index, and may not "count" auto-spun rubbish blogs, either for ranking or backlink sources.

If they haven't implemented these measures yet (and they almost certainly have), they will do so in the near future.

I believe unique content is necessary in the construction of networks that can pack a heavy punch and survive into the future.

Click to expand...

I see. I thought you can get around the crackdown by making them link randomly though.

mootonandy said:

I see. I thought you can get around the crackdown by making them link randomly though.

Click to expand...

That is essential, but these days it's not enough.

Some people might be lucky enough to slip through the cracks sometimes, but manipulative networks take time and energy to build. If they fail, the loss is big.

I agree with Micallef that unique content is important, but is unique readable content important for mini nets which are just glorified backlinks to your money site?

theguy2 said:

I agree with Micallef that unique content is important, but is unique readable content important for mini nets which are just glorified backlinks to your money site?

Click to expand...

I would not have thought so but I'm just a novice.

This is a good info for newbies.

Wow looks, nice, I suppose I can take articles form other blogs or ezinearticles, right?

gamecity said:

I can make 1 unique article in 15 minutes. This doesn't sound good at all. Even if it is 30 mins per article, I bet that can still beat 150 articles in a couple of days.

Click to expand...

Yeah, but the point is to make it less work. Once you have the master spun article, which at a comfortable pace would take one day at max, you then just have to run it through that Dupe program.

If you want to write 150 articles in a couple days or spend one day spinning one article really well, the choice is yours, but I'm pretty sure most people would rather spin one article than write 150.

gamecity said:

I can make 1 unique article in 15 minutes. This doesn't sound good at all. Even if it is 30 mins per article, I bet that can still beat 150 articles in a couple of days.

Click to expand...

I would much rather select words from a drop down list and watch TV than actually have to sit down, think and concentrate to write readable articles at high speed.

The difference in difficulty & effort required is an order of magnitude at least.

Micallef,

"Run the article through The Best Spinner and hand-spin the article to a uniqueness level of 90% or higher."

Do you mean what the best spinner considers 90% or what copy scape considers 90%?

Also, am I correct in thinking you are making 4 master articles which make 4 blog posts, then spinning them and reusing them for 10-20 2.0 sites? Basically the same 4 master articles will be used on every 2.0 site in their unique spun versions.

It seems the best solution would be original content, i Don't think anyone disputes that, but what is in dispute is if its worth it to create original content. There are many solutions to automate and spin content, but in reality I think you could just write semi-original articles in the same time frame.

My solution is to just hire a full time content writer in the philippines for $300 to $400 a month who just writes you content every day, all day that can feed all your marketing efforts, including articles, blog posts, and web 2.0 content. If you really look at the time spent on spinning, scraping, and testing to see if something is unique before you post it, i think the true cost (including your time, software cost) is more than what you can pay a writer full time and get more than just the content you need for your linkwheel,linknode, linkroot, link? ....what are we linking again

PLUS, that task is off your plate forever, you just give them the keywords (or teach them how to get them) and the outline of what you want and they deliver the content. Even if its not perfect it is certainly better than spun or gibberish that you are just creating to create fill content.

Micallef said:

As I've detailed in another thread, Google has cracked down on so-called linkwheels.

They're getting better at filtering the rubbish from their index, and may not "count" auto-spun rubbish blogs, either for ranking or backlink sources.

If they haven't implemented these measures yet (and they almost certainly have), they will do so in the near future.

Click to expand...

Could u elaborate on this? I thought from what i was reading it was the opposite, that spun was winning, that duplicate content on different websites was a myth, that google would never get english grammar right
maybe its a backlinks issue, the backlinks should be structured carefully, and most often with bungled up mininets they're not?