This is a great article. Thank you for it!
Now, i know its a "black hat" technique, and I've just seen that the original post dates from 2007! so at the risk of sounding like a complete dummy, it seems to me that it can really only work with porn, or a similar niche and then only with PPC monetisation which tends to be paid badly - in comparison to AF.
I'm more interested in AF, so a question: what happens if for example a dot tk site (as the new watermark in the video), is cloak-linked to an AF landing page, and the true owner of the original video discovers that their video links to that AF, is there any way the AF can trace back to the marketer of their product? through the ip address for example? Or put another way... what's the safest way of using this technique to promote an affiliate product - safest, in so far as not risking losing an account at clickbank for example?
Now, i know its a "black hat" technique, and I've just seen that the original post dates from 2007! so at the risk of sounding like a complete dummy, it seems to me that it can really only work with porn, or a similar niche and then only with PPC monetisation which tends to be paid badly - in comparison to AF.
I'm more interested in AF, so a question: what happens if for example a dot tk site (as the new watermark in the video), is cloak-linked to an AF landing page, and the true owner of the original video discovers that their video links to that AF, is there any way the AF can trace back to the marketer of their product? through the ip address for example? Or put another way... what's the safest way of using this technique to promote an affiliate product - safest, in so far as not risking losing an account at clickbank for example?
