How many moneysites do you put on a single Search Console?
- Thread starter ZuppaSoup
- Start date
gentzalli
Regular Member
- May 15, 2016
- 362
- 164
I have multiple money sites doing fine on a single console. They are unrelated to one another and do not have shared backlinks.
- May 10, 2012
- 9,541
- 7,560
Yeah, they will do fine, until one of them stops doing fine and rest will stop also. Totally unnecessary risk that can be avoided by 5 minutes of work.
Sidenote: I am very much enjoying you guys getting battered right now.
gentzalli
Regular Member
- May 15, 2016
- 362
- 164
Yeah, they will do fine, until one of them stops doing fine and rest will stop also. Totally unnecessary risk that can be avoided by 5 minutes of work.
Sidenote: I am very much enjoying you guys getting battered right now.
Well, I have been doing it for years with legitimate sites and the rankings have been rich for all of them, and I'm not being battered so I don't know what you're going on about. You are trying to present your own statement and opinion as facts when in reality you know no more about this particular subject than anyone else on this forum.
- May 10, 2012
- 9,541
- 7,560
Battered as in by Spurs at Old Trafford.
And yes, what I stated is a fact. I know of plenty of cases where once one of the sites got hit at the same console, the rest followed. Even if not and the chance was one to 10 000, is this worth it those 5 minutes that it would take to create a separate account? No idea how this is even a discussion. Giving the newbies the notion that it's fine to cut corners straight from the beginning, just because you or someone else got away with, literally, laziness, is not a good idea.
- Sep 7, 2017
- 7,162
- 6,411
Any empirical data to back this up?
- May 17, 2018
- 937
- 1,341
If you are absolutely 100% white-hat, the risk is minimal, but not nonexistent.
If you do any light-grey-hat, or if your competitors do any form of negative SEO, then ALL your domains will be flagged.
It's practically no extra work to separate your accounts, so why take the unnecessary risk?
If you do any light-grey-hat, or if your competitors do any form of negative SEO, then ALL your domains will be flagged.
It's practically no extra work to separate your accounts, so why take the unnecessary risk?
Codliver
Junior Member
- Jul 27, 2015
- 185
- 72
How so?
Codliver
Junior Member
- Jul 27, 2015
- 185
- 72
Battered as in by Spurs at Old Trafford.
And yes, what I stated is a fact. I know of plenty of cases where once one of the sites got hit at the same console, the rest followed. Even if not and the chance was one to 10 000, is this worth it those 5 minutes that it would take to create a separate account? No idea how this is even a discussion. Giving the newbies the notion that it's fine to cut corners straight from the beginning, just because you or someone else got away with, literally, laziness, is not a good idea.
How would this even do anything. Google knows your IP and if you tie adsense to any of them, they can pull info that way as well.
- May 10, 2012
- 9,541
- 7,560
1. What about using separate browsers with different proxies?
2. What Adsense? Who is talking about Adsense here?
smacker
Regular Member
- Sep 6, 2011
- 294
- 222
I can disagree. I have 6 sites in my main console. Longest has been online since 2004 but obvs not in console that long. Others added along the way. Old site has been doing 6-700k uniques steady for a decade, one of the newer additions got a wallop on the first penguin algo.. didn’t affect any of the others. Haven’t ever removed it either.. it’s still there, dead as a dodo ..
Codliver
Junior Member
- Jul 27, 2015
- 185
- 72
I am asking not telling. I've always wondered if Google tracks the same sites when adding analytics or search console or whatever. For example, I would worry if one site was hit it could affect or bring awareness to the rest of yours.
Or even just them knowing you had multiple sites tied to one name could be problematic. Like obviously one guy with 100 niche sites on a single account could be flagged as an internet marketer, who could be then monitored. But even 7 sites tied to one account probably represents like 5% of all site owners (majority of website owners probably own 1 website).
Wouldn't be hard to flag accounts based on this and then have automated ways of monitoring things. Refine these list further and have manual reviewers investigate, etc.