how many articles per web 2.0 account
- Thread starter mdsurf
- Start date
narayanan86
Junior Member
- Aug 29, 2009
- 188
- 21
Thanks for asking this.. Waiting for someone to answer
FuryKyle
Elite Member
- Nov 19, 2010
- 2,487
- 1,378
It's all about preference but for site like HP, it's a bit hard. It all depends really.
narayanan86
Junior Member
- Aug 29, 2009
- 188
- 21
Could you please elaborate a bit? Depends on what?
FuryKyle
Elite Member
- Nov 19, 2010
- 2,487
- 1,378
Depends on how many eggs you would put in a basket. Would you get 10 whopping baskets for 10 eggs though?
Ranko Jones
BANNED
- Mar 3, 2011
- 1,677
- 146
See I have been wondering this myself, WHY would you build more links from the same source since it's diminishing returns?
The only reason would be for the eggs in one basket analogy that is if you were using multiple accounts in case one got taken down. For linkjuice I don't see the point cos my from my exp it just gets diluted- i.e it's not cumulative for receiving links from the same source.
The only reason would be for the eggs in one basket analogy that is if you were using multiple accounts in case one got taken down. For linkjuice I don't see the point cos my from my exp it just gets diluted- i.e it's not cumulative for receiving links from the same source.
moneyspinner
Regular Member
- Jan 27, 2009
- 434
- 181
I would say, post around 5-6 on each of the account with a gap of around 4-10 days. This way your Web 2.0 property looks more genuine and would last for long time and might even get good PR. I have seen some good results using this method. It might vary for diff web2.0 site and niche.
Chrisss
Senior Member
- Feb 22, 2011
- 842
- 172
Ranko Jones
BANNED
- Mar 3, 2011
- 1,677
- 146
why 5 and not 1?
Neeoo
Junior Member
- Oct 6, 2010
- 156
- 112
I have schedule that I keep for each site.
Each week I do the following
1. Add 2 new web 2.0 sites (1 article each)
2. Add 2 new articles to the older web 2.0 sites that I already setup.
By doing this all web 2.0 sites are kept up to date. All articles are spun and readable. So there is no need to write them.
Each week I do the following
1. Add 2 new web 2.0 sites (1 article each)
2. Add 2 new articles to the older web 2.0 sites that I already setup.
By doing this all web 2.0 sites are kept up to date. All articles are spun and readable. So there is no need to write them.
yellowlaser
Registered Member
- May 11, 2010
- 88
- 5
I do around 3-4, I like to spread them out in case one account gets banned.
cody41
Power Member
- Jun 18, 2009
- 691
- 276
Law of diminishing returns. I have so many clients, plus my own network of 400 or so sites to maintain, that I need to cap my web 2.0 properties at a certain number so that I can actually manage my process. I treat each web 2.0 as a mini site, incorporate LSI structures and so forth.
i need views on this too ...
3 links in 5 articles on a web property all going to the same site should be considered as spam!
hispdcha
Regular Member
- May 24, 2011
- 290
- 133
I like to keep about 5 to 10 web 2.0's per website that I continually update content on and build new web 2.0's with spun articles linking to my main web 2.0's with only 2 to 3 articles. The main ones are well taken care of while the other ones are just to build links to the money web 2.0's.
I have multiple web 2.0 properties (Weebly + Wordpress + Blogger) that rank just below my money site for many keywords. There's nothing like owning 4 to 8 spots on the first page of your targeted terms.
I have multiple web 2.0 properties (Weebly + Wordpress + Blogger) that rank just below my money site for many keywords. There's nothing like owning 4 to 8 spots on the first page of your targeted terms.