How Instagram issues started

Chris.Roark

Elite Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2016
Messages
1,942
Reaction score
687
We are all aware of the issues faced on Instagram.

There are countless of threads with guys crying that IG blocked some of their accounts. Yet, I haven't seen on any of these threads a valid justification why these things happen.

After doing some research, I came across this article, posted in November by TechCrunch which quotes an IG blog post from 19 November 2018 (that note of this date).

Here are the articles:
https://techcrunch.com/2018/11/19/instagram-fake-followers/
https://instagram-press.com/blog/2018/11/19/reducing-inauthentic-activity-on-instagram/

Checking the article posted by Instagram, here's what they are saying about account activity:

instagram-blog.jpg


On other threads I saw a lot of people reporting their block as having one of several of the following causes.

Block causes mentioned by people:
  1. Datacenter proxies
  2. Residential proxies
  3. 4g proxies
  4. Jarvee
  5. GMT2
  6. Other bots
  7. Accounts blocks that were managed manually (no bot, no proxy)
  8. Accounts blocks that used home IP
Do you see any correlation between these reasons?

Well, the cause isn't tied to a particular proxy or bot type. Even accounts managed manually or on home IP address have this issue.

The only so-called correlation between these accounts is that they have high-engagement settings.

On these same threads, some of these users reported their accounts doing follow/unfollow with these settings:
  • 400 Follow/Unfollow per day
  • 600 Follow/Unfollw per day
So, how do you plan on flying under the radar with 600 follow unfollow per day?

Here's what IG says on that same blog post.

instagram block 2.jpg


Bottom line, the issue is nor related to certain proxies, bots or accounts.

The issue seems to be caused by the settings of these accounts.

What to do going forward?

There isn't a straight answer.

In the same way SEO guys do not know when Google updates its algorithms and when these updates take place and how they will impact their websites, Instagram is doing updates constantly (or as they like to say: "measures will be ongoing").

So, these issues should be expected from time to time. But as SEO guys adapt after every update, I think there is a way to adapt IG accounts too.
 
Interesting insight.

Perhaps I have not been abusing automation lately, and is why I do not see any ill effects?
 
BTW those are my conclusions two.
Limit is a sliding windows of X days and around 150 - 200 per day.
 
Without warming up accounts and forcing your accs to do unhuman activity, thats the problem .
 
Settings? software? maybe you do less then what you set ? how long you do it ?
I'm using a custom bot, not jarvee. Recently I had stopped automated actions like commenting and liking and im moving on with just follows, also accounts are pretty aged ones.
 
It seems that ig has capped follows at 6000 a month, which explains why newer accounts are not as affected as older ones. So you're probably right in saying 400 follows a day is too much
 
We are all aware of the issues faced on Instagram.

There are countless of threads with guys crying that IG blocked some of their accounts. Yet, I haven't seen on any of these threads a valid justification why these things happen.

After doing some research, I came across this article, posted in November by TechCrunch which quotes an IG blog post from 19 November 2018 (that note of this date).

Here are the articles:
https://techcrunch.com/2018/11/19/instagram-fake-followers/
https://instagram-press.com/blog/2018/11/19/reducing-inauthentic-activity-on-instagram/

Checking the article posted by Instagram, here's what they are saying about account activity:

View attachment 116795

On other threads I saw a lot of people reporting their block as having one of several of the following causes.

Block causes mentioned by people:
  1. Datacenter proxies
  2. Residential proxies
  3. 4g proxies
  4. Jarvee
  5. GMT2
  6. Other bots
  7. Accounts blocks that were managed manually (no bot, no proxy)
  8. Accounts blocks that used home IP
Do you see any correlation between these reasons?

Well, the cause isn't tied to a particular proxy or bot type. Even accounts managed manually or on home IP address have this issue.

The only so-called correlation between these accounts is that they have high-engagement settings.

On these same threads, some of these users reported their accounts doing follow/unfollow with these settings:
  • 400 Follow/Unfollow per day
  • 600 Follow/Unfollw per day
So, how do you plan on flying under the radar with 600 follow unfollow per day?

Here's what IG says on that same blog post.

View attachment 116796


Bottom line, the issue is nor related to certain proxies, bots or accounts.

The issue seems to be caused by the settings of these accounts.

What to do going forward?

There isn't a straight answer.

In the same way SEO guys do not know when Google updates its algorithms and when these updates take place and how they will impact their websites, Instagram is doing updates constantly (or as they like to say: "measures will be ongoing").

So, these issues should be expected from time to time. But as SEO guys adapt after every update, I think there is a way to adapt IG accounts too.
Thanks for the info! Lets hope we can learn a workaround to all this new bans soon!

There should be or we're doomed. btw I'm still ongoing with 400 F/UF per day
What tool do you use? How old is the account? Care to share more details? Thanks.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Good share! I am going to show this to my friend, he always tells me that botting on IG is easy and that we should do it...
 
But what do they mean exactly when they are saying they are removing inauthentic activity?

-Deleting likes/comments on old posts that they deem inauthentic?

-Or preventing those things from working on new posts?

I don't know anyone who has actually had likes or comments disappear from old posts. So it doesn't appear to be the first one, and yes they are trying to prevent the services from working, but they still end up working.

So what does this all really mean??
 
But what do they mean exactly when they are saying they are removing inauthentic activity?

-Deleting likes/comments on old posts that they deem inauthentic?

-Or preventing those things from working on new posts?

I don't know anyone who has actually had likes or comments disappear from old posts. So it doesn't appear to be the first one, and yes they are trying to prevent the services from working, but they still end up working.

So what does this all really mean??

They can do whatever they want. Is their platform, so there are no limits to the actions they can take.

They say that some actions might not show. This doesn't mean that it won't show to you when you are logged in. It "could" mean that these actions are not shown when are people are looking at your account.

"Maybe" is similar to Reddit's ghost-banning which blocks your account and content from being seen by others while you can still use it as a regular user ( to post comments, upvotes which are never recorded or shown to other users).

Notice the words in quotes ("")? that's because we, all of us, can only speculate on the real reasons and actions of IG.
 
It seems to be logical.
Nevertheless, the article is 6 months old and follow blocks are recent.
I am adjusting as anyone else and next batch will use 4g instead of datacenter.
 
Back
Top