How good GPT-3 for content creation - My experience

Hi, there!
I have started generating content using GPT-3 in September.
GPT-3 has written for me 12 articles since that.
Here's https://www.vproexpert.com/how-to-do-an-effective-seo-audit/.

In most cases, the quality of the created content is very high, but there are some peculiarities.
If the area of expertise in which you want to create content is rather complex (machine learning, search engine optimization, physics), the GPT-3 often loses the main idea of the article and starts creating irrelevant text. Therefore, it is often necessary to direct GPT-3 in the right direction.

I first got access to the algorithm using the tool Philosopher AI, but now it is not available.

I will share with you links to some tools that use this technology.
https://www.usetopic.com/blog-idea-generator
https://www.copy.ai/ will help you automate the tedious, and oftentimes frustrating, aspects of ads creation.
https://www.shortlyread.com/ - Content Generator.

So far, these are the results.
View attachment 152089
Which color is CopyAI and which one is Shortlyread?
 
Once given an outline to follow, GPT-3 can produce a pretty solid first draft. In some studies, GPT-3 fooled up to 88% of people when they had to guess if the copy was written by a bot or a human.
 
I'm thinking of trying it out for a month. Right time for a Holidays experiment.
 
It depends, as John Muller says. :)

Something good. Something not.
123.jpg
If you actively do this, you can get good results. The site has too little content to generate a lot of traffic. And I haven't published anything for a long time.
 
Back
Top