Throwing tons of links at a site doesn't magically make money appear. It's not like stuffing more coins in a slot machine, doing "the doubling strategy each time you lose".
The real game is building a network of quality domains that work together smoothly. Think of it like a well-oiled machine, not a numbers game.
What truly matters?
How your sites flow, how users feel browsing them, the value they get. Good UX across your network? That's winning over trash links and "backlink profiles" any day of the week.
A few solid, relevant links from auction domains beat a heap of junk ones any day.
Focus on creating a web of sites that people actually want to explore. That's where the real payoff is. No shortcuts, just smart building for people by people. Not for algorithms that are past the stage of numbers since 12 years or so.
AI is intelligent and it knows you're trying to trick it. You can simulate Google AI on your computer. Maybe someone can make such a project to show fallacies of those approaches.
Clearly that backlink profile as a profile is trash:
- max do follows - weak ratios;
- probably messed up anchor texts;
- 3rd party metric boosted - DR.
You can get 200k backlinks using site-wide spamming. It's super easy to automate such a thing in a month and replicate that shit, but it doesn't work beyond selling trash domains market (scamming people).

Ok, if we're skeptic, we can maybe get some general search engine visibility boost, but then the days of mass drops will come and instead of lasting 10 years, sites will last 6 months. And then "mom, my ranks dropped, I need to get silver V from bronze V again".
Find grandmaster / master (black belt) strategy. On emerald you get $100k monthly.