1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Hit hard by that stupid penguin!

Discussion in 'Black Hat SEO' started by bwaldon4, Oct 8, 2012.

  1. bwaldon4

    bwaldon4 Newbie

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2012
    Messages:
    37
    Likes Received:
    1
    Up until the last few days my site was ranking withing the top 3 positions for all my main keywords then BAM! Now I am on the sencond page... The main keyword I was trying to rank for was 17% of the total links going to my site.... OUCH!

    Do you think it would be a good idea if I drip some article diectory backlinks to my site with only generic anchors and my web URL over the next month? And while I'm diluting the links I have maybe I should start building link pryamids to the relevent links that are already going to my site to enhance the credibility?

    I have less than 1,000 links going to my site.
     
  2. Adam718

    Adam718 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2012
    Messages:
    1,015
    Likes Received:
    433
    Occupation:
    Freelance writer and SEO Specialist
    Location:
    NYC
    Are you sure it's a backlink penalty? 17% main anchor isn't that much.
     
  3. jascoken

    jascoken Senior Member

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2010
    Messages:
    1,135
    Likes Received:
    751
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    IT/Web Systems & Development...
    Location:
    Sussex:UK
    For a compehensive breakdown of the typical anchor metrics post-penguin, read this:

    http://www.backlinkbanzai.com/GooglePenguinPart2.htm

    17% isn't huge - but it could easily be enough to trip a penalty in some niches. Also, if that keyword is included in a decent percentage of other anchor keywords, then they will also be contributing to an over-density of the original keyword.

    i.e. if you had 17% 'weight loss', but another 10% with 'weight loss tips' and another 10% with 'weight loss help', then you have an effective density of 37% for the phrase 'weight loss', as another 20% of your terms contains 'weight loss' in a phrase-match term.

    Read the above article for a more in-depth explanation.
     
  4. bwaldon4

    bwaldon4 Newbie

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2012
    Messages:
    37
    Likes Received:
    1
    I have no critical issues in my webmaster account, nor have I made any significant changes to the site. I did scan my competitors that rank in the first two positions and there top keywords are mostly their name and randomness. You would think they aren't doing any SEO but I know for a fact one of them is.
     
  5. bwaldon4

    bwaldon4 Newbie

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2012
    Messages:
    37
    Likes Received:
    1
    That makes sense. I compete for:

    Online personal trainer
    personal trainer online
    online fitness
    fitness online
    online fitness trainer
    fitness trainer online
    etc.

    So if your analysis is correct my anchor density would easily reach 40%... Uh oh :O hahaha
     
  6. jascoken

    jascoken Senior Member

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2010
    Messages:
    1,135
    Likes Received:
    751
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    IT/Web Systems & Development...
    Location:
    Sussex:UK
    As the article explains, it's not as cut-and-dried as simple 'exact-match' over-optimisation, but I've seen countless cases where companies have showed me their 'diverse' link-profile of 100+ different anchors, and it ended up with 70% of them 'containing' one exact-match phrase.

    The Google algorithm works with the individual words that make-up a phrase, so this has to be taken into account when creating diversity in your anchor-profiles...

    After all, if you had 100 links and they were all 'weight loss XXX' - where XXX was a different word, then you'd theoretically have 100 different anchors - but obviously you'd be over-optimised for 'weight loss'.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 2
  7. bwaldon4

    bwaldon4 Newbie

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2012
    Messages:
    37
    Likes Received:
    1
    Thank you for the extremely valuable information! Just this smal piece of information will seriously change my SEO blueprint. :)